Christopher Markham1, Enola K Proctor, Jose A Pineda. 1. aDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis Children's Hospital bGeorge Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Brain-directed critical care for children is a relatively new area of subspecialization in pediatric critical care. Pediatric neurocritical care teams combine the expertise of neurology, neurosurgery, and critical care medicine. The positive impact of delivering specialized care to pediatric patients with acute neurological illness is becoming more apparent, but the optimum way to implement and sustain the delivery of this is complicated and poorly understood. We aim to provide emerging evidence supporting that effective implementation of pediatric neurocritical care pathways can improve patient survival and outcomes. We also provide an overview of the most effective strategies across the field of implementation science that can facilitate deployment of neurocritical care pathways in the pediatric ICU. RECENT FINDINGS: Implementation strategies can broadly be grouped according to six categories: planning, educating, restructuring, financing, managing quality, and attending to the policy context. Using a combination of these strategies in the last decade, several institutions have improved patient morbidity and mortality. Although much work remains to be done, emerging evidence supports that implementation of evidence-based care pathways for critically ill children with two common neurological diagnoses - status epilepticus and traumatic brain injury - improves outcomes. SUMMARY: Pediatric and neonatal neurocritical care programs that support evidence-based care can be effectively structured using appropriately sequenced implementation strategies to improve outcomes across a variety of patient populations and in a variety of healthcare settings.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Brain-directed critical care for children is a relatively new area of subspecialization in pediatric critical care. Pediatric neurocritical care teams combine the expertise of neurology, neurosurgery, and critical care medicine. The positive impact of delivering specialized care to pediatric patients with acute neurological illness is becoming more apparent, but the optimum way to implement and sustain the delivery of this is complicated and poorly understood. We aim to provide emerging evidence supporting that effective implementation of pediatric neurocritical care pathways can improve patient survival and outcomes. We also provide an overview of the most effective strategies across the field of implementation science that can facilitate deployment of neurocritical care pathways in the pediatric ICU. RECENT FINDINGS: Implementation strategies can broadly be grouped according to six categories: planning, educating, restructuring, financing, managing quality, and attending to the policy context. Using a combination of these strategies in the last decade, several institutions have improved patient morbidity and mortality. Although much work remains to be done, emerging evidence supports that implementation of evidence-based care pathways for critically ill children with two common neurological diagnoses - status epilepticus and traumatic brain injury - improves outcomes. SUMMARY: Pediatric and neonatal neurocritical care programs that support evidence-based care can be effectively structured using appropriately sequenced implementation strategies to improve outcomes across a variety of patient populations and in a variety of healthcare settings.
Authors: Mary Kay Bader; Sonja E Stutzman; Sylvain Palmer; Chiedozie I Nwagwu; Gary Goodman; Margie Whittaker; Daiwai M Olson Journal: Crit Care Nurse Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 1.708
Authors: Byron J Powell; J Curtis McMillen; Enola K Proctor; Christopher R Carpenter; Richard T Griffey; Alicia C Bunger; Joseph E Glass; Jennifer L York Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2011-12-26 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Ericka L Fink; Patrick M Kochanek; Robert C Tasker; John Beca; Michael J Bell; Robert S B Clark; Jamie Hutchison; Monica S Vavilala; Anthony Fabio; Derek C Angus; R Scott Watson Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Monica S Vavilala; Mary A Kernic; Jin Wang; Nithya Kannan; Richard B Mink; Mark S Wainwright; Jonathan I Groner; Michael J Bell; Christopher C Giza; Douglas F Zatzick; Richard G Ellenbogen; Linda Ng Boyle; Pamela H Mitchell; Frederick P Rivara Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Ryan P Williams; Brenda Banwell; Robert A Berg; Dennis J Dlugos; Maureen Donnelly; Rebecca Ichord; Sudha Kilaru Kessler; Jane Lavelle; Shavonne L Massey; Jennifer Hewlett; Allison Parker; Alexis A Topjian; Nicholas S Abend Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Michael J Bell; Jessica Carpenter; Alicia K Au; Robert F Keating; John S Myseros; Amanda Yaun; Steven Weinstein Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2009 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Monica S Vavilala; Mary A King; Jen-Ting Yang; Scott L Erickson; Brianna Mills; Rosemary M Grant; Carolyn Blayney; Qian Qiu; Randall M Chesnut; Kenneth M Jaffe; Bryan J Weiner; Brian D Johnston Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Date: 2018-11-23
Authors: Steven W Howard; Zidong Zhang; Paula Buchanan; Stephanie L Bernell; Christine Williams; Lindsey Pearson; Michael Huetsch; Jeff Gill; Jose A Pineda Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 2.655