Literature DB >> 21926290

Long-term metabolic and immunological follow-up of nonimmunosuppressed patients with type 1 diabetes treated with microencapsulated islet allografts: four cases.

Giuseppe Basta1, Pia Montanucci, Giovanni Luca, Carlo Boselli, Giuseppe Noya, Barbara Barbaro, Meirigeng Qi, Katie P Kinzer, José Oberholzer, Riccardo Calafiore.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term metabolic and immunological follow-up of microencapsulated human islet allografts in nonimmunosuppressed patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Four nonimmunosuppressed patients, with long-standing T1DM, received intraperitoneal transplant (TX) of microencapsulated human islets. Anti-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-II, GAD65, and islet cell antibodies were measured before and long term after TX.
RESULTS: All patients turned positive for serum C-peptide response, both in basal and after stimulation, throughout 3 years of posttransplant follow-up. Daily mean blood glucose, as well as HbA(1c) levels, significantly improved after TX, with daily exogenous insulin consumption declining in all cases and being discontinued, just transiently, only in patient 4. Anti-MHC class I-II and GAD65 antibodies all tested negative at 3 years after TX.
CONCLUSIONS: The grafts did not elicit any immune response, even in the cases where more than one preparation was transplanted, as a unique finding, compatible with encapsulation-driven "bioinvisibility" of the grafted islets. This result had never been achieved with the recipient's general immunosuppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21926290      PMCID: PMC3198271          DOI: 10.2337/dc11-0731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


The primary goal of this study, following our previous report (1), was to determine long-term safety of encapsulated human islet (HI) transplant (TX), upon completion of two additional cases. The following parameters were examined: 1) TX-related adverse reactions; 2) TX-directed immune destruction in nonimmunosuppressed recipients; and 3) sensitization to grafted encapsulated islet cell antigens. We also examined 1) changes in exogenous insulin consumption; 2) levels of prior negative serum C-peptide response; 3) changes in severe nocturnal hypoglycemia, defined by blood glucose (BG) <40 mg/dL (patients 1 and 2) (2); and 4) changes in HbA1c plasma levels.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Human islet procurement

HIs were isolated from single donor pancreases, according to the Edmonton protocol (3). Islet preparations from our laboratory were grafted in patients 1 and 2. We also used HIs procured at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) (patients 3 and 4). The “UIC HIs” were isolated using a modified Ricordi’s method and passed the product release criteria including viability, purity, and endotoxin levels <5 endotoxin units/g (EU/g), as required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The UIC HIs could be used in our Center because there was no suitable U.S. recipient available for such a given islet preparation. This scenario happened because the HI yield was insufficient to achieve the required 5,000 islet equivalents (IEQ)/kg body wt of listed U.S. recipients. Islet morphology, viability, and functionality assessments were performed before and after microencapsulation, showing 1) purity >80%; 2) viability >90%; and 3) stimulation index upon static incubation with glucose >5 above baseline.

Islet microencapsulation

The selected islet batches were encapsulated in ultra-purified, endotoxin-free sodium alginate prepared in-house (patent number WO 2009/093184 A1) by our method (4).

Patient selection

Four patients with long-standing type 1 diabetes (T1DM) were selected, as previously reported (1).

Clinical, metabolic, and immunological evaluation

All clinical and metabolic parameters were carefully acquired before and strictly monitored after TX.

Basal pre-TX clinical assessment.

Complete blood chemistry, including all metabolic parameters (HbA1c; daily glucose profiles after and 3 consecutive months before entering the trial), was performed.

Post-TX assessment.

All grafted patients underwent hourly BG and exogenous insulin supplement monitoring to keep BG within the prefixed range (120–150 mg/dL).

Metabolic and immunological characterization.

All patients, upon TX, underwent either an oral glucose tolerance test (75 g; patient 1 only) or a glucagon (1 mg i.v.) or arginine test (10 g in 250 mL saline i.v.; patient 1 only) to determine basal and poststimulation serum C-peptide response by radioimmunoassay (Myria, Milan, Italy). Islet cell antibodies, anti-GAD65 antibodies, and anti-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I–II antibodies were assessed before and after transplantation (Table 1) on a long-term follow-up basis. Anti-MHC class I–II antibodies were assessed by ELISA (Biotest, Waukesha, WI).
Table 1

Summary of clinical, metabolic, and immunological data of the transplanted patients throughout long-term follow-up (patients 1 and 4 received more than one graft)

Patient 2Patient 3Patient 1Patient 4
Duration of T1DM (years)20212527
Pre-TX severe hypoglycemia (events/week)1344
Post-TX severe hypoglycemia (events/week)0000
Body weight at the time of transplant (kg)78687068
72*66
Mass of islets implanted (IEQ)650,000540,000400,000500,000
400,000*500,000
600,000
Total islet mass (IEQ)NANA800,0001,600,000
Pre-TX mean BG (mg/dL)235 ± 78180 ± 63275 ± 98247 ± 55
Post-TX mean BG (mg/dL)
 6 months155 ± 44103 ± 34115 ± 56*145 ± 36
 12 months174 ± 54176 ± 50167 ± 58151 ± 18
 15 months190 ± 18170 ± 63175 ± 24176 ± 12
 18 months165 ± 44123 ± 14180 ± 36170 ± 38
 24 months176 ± 31162 ± 15198 ± 16176 ± 26
 30 months195 ± 06Dropout241 ± 20177 ± 24
 36 months201 ± 41208 ± 16204 ± 16
Pre-TX sCPR (ng/mL)UndetectableUndetectableUndetectableUndetectable
Post-TX sCPR (ng/mL)
 3 monthsPremeal = 0.25, postmeal = 1.00Premeal = 0.63, postmeal = 1.30Premeal = 0.20, postmeal = 0.90Premeal = 0.57, postmeal = 1.10
 6 monthsPremeal = 0.41, postmeal = 0.85Premeal = 0.58, postmeal = 0.91Premeal = 0.10, postmeal = 0.42*Premeal = 0.33, postmeal = 0.81
 12 monthsPremeal = 0.35, postmeal = 0.80Premeal = 0.40, postmeal = 0.75Premeal = 0.25, postmeal = 0.50Premeal = 0.35, postmeal = 0.73
 18 monthsPremeal = 0.30, postmeal = 0.75Premeal = 0.20, postmeal = 0.50Premeal = 0.18, postmeal = 0.48Premeal = 0.31, postmeal = 0.74
 24 monthsPremeal = 0.18, postmeal = 0.61Premeal = 0.10, postmeal = 0.44Premeal = 0.26, postmeal = 0.58Premeal = 0.35, postmeal = 0.70
 30 monthsPremeal = 0.15, postmeal = 0.47DropoutPremeal = 0.15, postmeal = 0.45Premeal = 0.46, postmeal = 0.74
 36 monthsPremeal = 0.10, postmeal = 0.51Premeal = 0.26, postmeal = 0.55Premeal = 0.34, postmeal = 0.76
Daily exogenous insulin (IU) pre-TX37363232
Daily exogenous insulin (IU) post-TX
 3 months29221321
 6 months222015*22
 12 months22181520
 15 months28202220
 18 months28162220
 24 months30182526
 27 months30Dropout2224
 30 months282528
 36 months282528
Pre-TX GHb (%)8.7 ± 0.38.0 ± 0.69.0 ± 0.29.0 ± 0.4
Post-TX GHb (%)
 3 months7.2 ± 0.47.2 ± 0.47.8 ± 0.48.1 ± 0.2
 6 months7.5 ± 0.37.4 ± 0.28.2 ± 0.3*7.2 ± 0.4
 12 months7.8 ± 0.37.3 ± 0.37.2 ± 0.16.5 ± 0.3
 15 months7.6 ± 0.27.1 ± 0.57.6 ± 0.45.9 ± 0.2
 18 months8.0 ± 0.17.2 ± 0.17.4 ± 0.26.2 ± 0.4
 24 months7.8 ± 0.37.5 ± 0.37.7 ± 0.47.4 ± 0.1
 27 months7.5 ± 0.4Dropout7.2 ± 0.27.2 ± 0.2
 30 months7.3 ± 0.47.7 ± 0.36.1 ± 0.3
 36 months7.5 ± 0.1
Metabolic function
 sCPR (ng/mL), 3 monthsNAOral glucose tolerance test BG (mg/dL)-sCPR
  0 min150–0.075
  30 min230–0.100
  60 min240–0.198
  90 min280–0.130
  120 min300–0.209
  180 min288–0.171
  240 min285–0.090
 sCPR (ng/mL), 3 monthsNAArginine
  0 min0.26
  2 min0.32
  4 min0.30
  6 min0.45
  8 min0.31
  10 min0.38
 sCPR (ng/mL), 3 monthsNAGlucagon testGlucagon test
  0 min0.0470.71
  5 min0.017
  10 min1.0900.83
  15 min1.480
  30 min0.5000.95
  40 min0.8400.82
  60 min0.3800.99
  120 min0.4700.77
 sCPR (ng/mL), 12 monthsGlucagon test
  0 min0.18
  5 min0.59
  10 min0.56
  15 min0.62
  20 min0.74
  30 min0.71
  40 min0.85
  50 min0.90
  60 min
  120 min0.42
 sCPR (ng/mL), 36 monthsDropoutDropoutGlucagon test
  0 min0.30
  5 min0.42
  10 min0.48
  15 min0.89
  20 min0.76
  30 min0.74
  40 min0.44
  50 min0.37
  60 min
  120 min0.32
Immune monitoring (pre-TX)
 Anti-GAD 65 antibodiesNegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
 Islet cell antibodiesNegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
 Class I HLANegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
 Class II HLANegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
Immune monitoring (3–5 years post-TX)
 Anti-GAD 65 antibodiesNegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
 Islet cell antibodiesNegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
 Class I HLANegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
 Class II HLANegativeNegativeNegativeNegative

sCPR, serum C-peptide response. Patients 2 and 3 got a single islet graft. Patient 1 got a second graft

*6 months after the first one. Patient 4 got a second graft

†7 days after the first one and

‡a third graft 6 months after the first.

Summary of clinical, metabolic, and immunological data of the transplanted patients throughout long-term follow-up (patients 1 and 4 received more than one graft) sCPR, serum C-peptide response. Patients 2 and 3 got a single islet graft. Patient 1 got a second graft *6 months after the first one. Patient 4 got a second graft †7 days after the first one and ‡a third graft 6 months after the first.

Imaging.

Abdominal MRI was scheduled only if necessary, to exclude the occurrence of post-TX peritoneal lesions.

Site of transplant and intervention procedure

All patients received a transplant of microencapsulated HIs intraperitoneally, under ecography guidance and local anesthesia. The encapsulated islet suspension in saline was placed in a 60-mL syringe barrel and slowly delivered through a polypropylene catheter into the peritoneal cavity through a small incision of the abdominal wall. The injected total graft volume did not exceed 100 mL (capsules + saline). Patient 4, on his third TX, underwent abdominal laparoscopy, under general anesthesia, to visually select and optimize the TX site and possibly avoid capsule injection errors (see patient 1). In this instance, the microcapsules were evenly distributed beneath the liver and the spleen, where blood supply is high. In all TX procedures, care was taken to dispense the capsular suspension as thoroughly as possible, to prevent formation of capsules clusters. Human islet dosing varied between recipients, ranging from 5,000 to 15,000 IEQ/kg/TX (range 540,000–1,600,000 IEQ/patient). This result strictly depended on organ availability and the islet isolation rate per pancreas.

RESULTS

Clinical outcome

None of the TX recipients showed any acute, significant postoperatory side effects. BG levels were stable, both short and long term after TX. In particular, throughout 24 months of TX, daily mean BG was stable in all patients, whereas after such time, the values tended to slightly but progressively raise. Interestingly, patient 1, who had suffered for severe nocturnal hypoglycemic episodes, showed evident recovery, in conjunction with stabilization of BG profiles. The natural history of this pilot study is summarized in Table 1, throughout 3 consecutive years of post-TX follow-up. At this time, the study was terminated and the patients were seen once a year. So far, at 7 years post-TX, all patients are in good health and are fully back to their original exogenous insulin therapy regimens.

Immunological findings

As a unique finding, no anti-MHC class I–II or anti-GAD65 antibodies or islet cell antibodies were detected in any of the transplanted patients throughout 5 years of post-TX follow-up (Table 1).

Microcapsule retrieval

Patient 1, 5 years after TX, back to his original insulin schedule, started complaining of abdominal discomfort. In our Center, upon palpation of the abdomen, we found a small mass that ultrasound scan identified as a hyperechoic cyst-like formation. The cyst, situated in the rectus anterior muscle, was surgically removed and consisted of a 3- to 4-cm fibrotic lump that contained mostly intact capsules with no more viable islet cells inside. Obviously, the original capsules, in this instance, had been mistakenly injected beneath the muscle fascia rather than intraperitoneally, thus resulting in the cyst formation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our alginate/polyaminoacidic encapsulation system has been confirmed to represent a powerful tool for immunoprotection of HI grafts (5), as proven by the absence of a wide array of islet cell-directed as well as anti-MHC class I–II antibodies (6). Hence, microcapsules provided the islet grafts with bioinvisibility, according to U.S. Food and Drug Administration criteria. In our opinion, this was the most important finding of the study. Obviously, the partial and transient metabolic benefits obtained by the treatment reflect limitations of this microcapsules generation, with special regard to their size in relation to TX site. Moreover, HIs can be moved through long distances with no loss of their viability and function (7). We maintain that smaller-size microcapsules could permit access to TX sites possibly associated with better functional exchange, thereby complying, more efficiently, with metabolic requirements of patients with T1DM.
  7 in total

1.  Optimized parameters for microencapsulation of pancreatic islet cells: an in vitro study clueing on islet graft immunoprotection in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  G Basta; P Sarchielli; G Luca; L Racanicchi; C Nastruzzi; L Guido; F Mancuso; G Macchiarulo; G Calabrese; P Brunetti; R Calafiore
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.708

2.  Microencapsulated pancreatic islet allografts into nonimmunosuppressed patients with type 1 diabetes: first two cases.

Authors:  Riccardo Calafiore; Giuseppe Basta; Giovanni Luca; Angelo Lemmi; M Pia Montanucci; Giuseppe Calabrese; Leda Racanicchi; Francesca Mancuso; Paolo Brunetti
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Functional capacity of human islets after long-distance shipment and encapsulation.

Authors:  Vijayaganapathy Vaithilingam; Barbara Barbaro; Jose Oberholzer; Bernard E Tuch
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.327

4.  Islet transplantation in seven patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen.

Authors:  A M Shapiro; J R Lakey; E A Ryan; G S Korbutt; E Toth; G L Warnock; N M Kneteman; R V Rajotte
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Assessment of the severity of hypoglycemia and glycemic lability in type 1 diabetic subjects undergoing islet transplantation.

Authors:  Edmond A Ryan; Tami Shandro; Kristy Green; Breay W Paty; Peter A Senior; David Bigam; A M James Shapiro; Marie-Christine Vantyghem
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.461

6.  Formulating the alginate-polyornithine biocapsule for prolonged stability: evaluation of composition and manufacturing technique.

Authors:  C G Thanos; R Calafiore; G Basta; B E Bintz; W J Bell; J Hudak; A Vasconcellos; P Schneider; S J M Skinner; M Geaney; P Tan; R B Elliot; M Tatnell; L Escobar; H Qian; E Mathiowitz; D F Emerich
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.396

7.  Recurrence of type 1 diabetes after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation, despite immunosuppression, is associated with autoantibodies and pathogenic autoreactive CD4 T-cells.

Authors:  Francesco Vendrame; Antonello Pileggi; Elsa Laughlin; Gloria Allende; Ainhoa Martin-Pagola; R Damaris Molano; Stavros Diamantopoulos; Nathan Standifer; Kelly Geubtner; Ben A Falk; Hirohito Ichii; Hidenori Takahashi; Isaac Snowhite; Zhibin Chen; Armando Mendez; Linda Chen; Junichiro Sageshima; Phillip Ruiz; Gaetano Ciancio; Camillo Ricordi; Helena Reijonen; Gerald T Nepom; George W Burke; Alberto Pugliese
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 9.461

  7 in total
  61 in total

1.  25 YEARS OF THE RICORDI AUTOMATED METHOD FOR ISLET ISOLATION.

Authors:  Lorenzo Piemonti; Antonello Pileggi
Journal:  CellR4 Repair Replace Regen Reprogram       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Bioengineered sites for islet cell transplantation.

Authors:  Sophie Vériter; Pierre Gianello; Denis Dufrane
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 3.  Transdisciplinary approach to restore pancreatic islet function.

Authors:  Carmen Fotino; R Damaris Molano; Camillo Ricordi; Antonello Pileggi
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.829

Review 4.  Stem Cell Therapies for Treating Diabetes: Progress and Remaining Challenges.

Authors:  Julie B Sneddon; Qizhi Tang; Peter Stock; Jeffrey A Bluestone; Shuvo Roy; Tejal Desai; Matthias Hebrok
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 5.  Stem cells for the cell and molecular therapy of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D): the gap between dream and reality.

Authors:  Riccardo Calafiore; Giuseppe Basta
Journal:  Am J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-03-15

Review 6.  Encapsulated Islet Transplantation: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Vijayaganapathy Vaithilingam; Sumeet Bal; Bernard E Tuch
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2017-06-12

Review 7.  Re-engineering islet cell transplantation.

Authors:  Nicoletta Fotino; Carmen Fotino; Antonello Pileggi
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 7.658

8.  Patient and family expectations of beta-cell replacement therapies in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Akitsu Kawabe; Shinichi Matsumoto; Masayuki Shimoda
Journal:  Islets       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 9.  Macro- or microencapsulation of pig islets to cure type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Denis Dufrane; Pierre Gianello
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Progress and challenges in macroencapsulation approaches for type 1 diabetes (T1D) treatment: Cells, biomaterials, and devices.

Authors:  Shang Song; Shuvo Roy
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.