Literature DB >> 15047610

Assessment of the severity of hypoglycemia and glycemic lability in type 1 diabetic subjects undergoing islet transplantation.

Edmond A Ryan1, Tami Shandro, Kristy Green, Breay W Paty, Peter A Senior, David Bigam, A M James Shapiro, Marie-Christine Vantyghem.   

Abstract

Currently, the major indications for solitary islet transplantation are recurrent severe hypoglycemia and labile glucose control. Quantifying these problems remains subjective. We have developed a scoring system for both hypoglycemia and glycemic lability, established normative data, and used them in patients who have undergone islet transplantation. A composite hypoglycemic score (HYPO score) was devised based on the frequency, severity, and degree of unawareness of the hypoglycemia. In addition, using 4 weeks of glucose records, a lability index (LI) was calculated based on the change in glucose levels over time and compared with a clinical assessment of glycemic lability. A mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) was also calculated based on 2 consecutive days of seven readings each day. These scores were determined in 100 randomly selected subjects with type 1 diabetes from our general clinic to serve as a control group and in patients before and after islet transplantation. The mean age of the control diabetic subjects was 38.4 +/- 1.3 years (+/-SE), with a duration of diabetes of 21.5 +/- 1.1 years. The median HYPO score in the control subjects was 143 (25th to 75th interquartile range: 46-423). The LI in the diabetic control subjects was 223 (25th to 75th interquartile range: 130-329 mmol/l(2)/h.week(-1)). The LI correlated much more closely than the MAGE with the clinical assessment of lability. A HYPO score of > or = 1,047 (90th percentile) or an LI > or = 433 mmol/l(2)/h.week(-1) (90th percentile) indicated serious problems with hypoglycemia or glycemic lability, respectively. The islet transplant patients (n = 51) were 42.1 +/- 1.4 years old, with a duration of diabetes of 25.7 +/- 1.4 years. Islet transplant patients had a mean HYPO score of 1,234 +/- 184 pretransplant, which was significantly higher than that of the control subjects (P < 0.001), which became negligible posttransplantation with the elimination of hypoglycemia. The median LI pretransplant was 497 mmol/l(2)/h.week(-1) (25th to 75th interquartile range: 330-692), significantly higher than that of control subjects (P < 0.001), and fell to 40 (25th to 75th interquartile range: 14-83) within a month after the final transplant. In those who had lost graft function, the LI rose again. The HYPO score and LI provide measures of the extent of problems with hypoglycemia and glycemic lability, respectively, complement the clinical assessment of the problems with glucose control before islet transplantation, and will allow comparison of selection of subjects for transplants between centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15047610     DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.53.4.955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes        ISSN: 0012-1797            Impact factor:   9.461


  93 in total

1.  Challenges facing islet transplantation for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Kristina I Rother; David M Harlan
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Prediction of the risk to develop diabetes-related late complications by means of the glucose pentagon model: analysis of data from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring study.

Authors:  Andreas Thomas; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-05-01

3.  Three cases of alopecia following clinical islet transplantation.

Authors:  D M Zuk; A Koh; S Imes; A M J Shapiro; P A Senior
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  The metrics of glycaemic control in critical care.

Authors:  Iain M J Mackenzie; Tony Whitehouse; Peter G Nightingale
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  State of the art of clinical islet transplantation and novel protocols of immunosuppression.

Authors:  A M James Shapiro
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  Measures of Risk and Glucose Variability in Adults Versus Youths.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Comparative Simulation Study of Glucose Control Methods Designed for Use in the Intensive Care Unit Setting via a Novel Controller Scoring Metric.

Authors:  Jeremy DeJournett; Leon DeJournett
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-22

8.  25 YEARS OF THE RICORDI AUTOMATED METHOD FOR ISLET ISOLATION.

Authors:  Lorenzo Piemonti; Antonello Pileggi
Journal:  CellR4 Repair Replace Regen Reprogram       Date:  2013

Review 9.  Islet transplantation: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Betul Hatipoglu; Enrico Benedetti; José Oberholzer
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.810

10.  Long-Term Improvement in Glucose Control and Counterregulation by Islet Transplantation for Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Michael R Rickels; Amy J Peleckis; Eileen Markmann; Cornelia Dalton-Bakes; Stephanie M Kong; Karen L Teff; Ali Naji
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.