Literature DB >> 21925778

Parents' experiences and perceptions of group-based antenatal care in four clinics in Sweden.

Ewa Andersson1, Kyllike Christensson, Ingegerd Hildingsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: group-based antenatal care consists of six to nine two-hour sessions in which information is shared and discussed during the first hour and individual examinations are conducted during the second hour. Groups generally consist of six to eight pregnant women. Parent education is built into the programme, which originated in the United States and was introduced in Sweden at the beginning of the year of 2000.
OBJECTIVE: to investigate parents' experiences of group antenatal care in four different clinics in Sweden.
METHOD: a qualitative study was conducted using content analysis five group interviews and eleven individual interviews with parents who experienced group-based antenatal care. An interview guide was used. SETTINGS: the study was set in four antenatal clinics that had offered group-based antenatal care for at least one year. The clinics were located in three different areas of Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: the participants were women and their partners who had experienced group-based antenatal care during pregnancy. Other criteria for participation were mastery of the Swedish language and having followed the care programme.
FINDINGS: three themes emerged, 'The care-combining individual physical needs with preparation for parenthood, refers to the context, organisation, and content of care'. Group antenatal care with inbuilt parent education was appreciated, but respondents reported that they felt unprepared for the first few weeks after birth. Their medical needs (for physical assessment and screening) were, however, fulfilled. The theme, 'The group-a composed recipient of care', showed the participants role and experience. The role could be passive or active in groups or described as sharers. Groups helped parents normalise their symptoms. The theme, 'The midwife-a controlling professional', showed midwives are ignorant of gender issues but, for their medical knowledge, viewed as respectable professionals. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: in the four clinics studied, group-based antenatal care appeared to meet parents' needs for physical assessment and screening. Parents identified that the groups helped them prepare for birth but not for parenthood. The group model created a forum for sharing experiences and helped participants to normalise their pregnancy symptoms. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTISE: the midwife's role in facilitating group-based antenatal care demands new pedagogical strategies and approaches.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21925778     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  15 in total

1.  Group Medical Visits as Participatory Care in Community Health Centers.

Authors:  Ariana Thompson-Lastad
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2018-06

2.  Group prenatal care: model fidelity and outcomes.

Authors:  Gina Novick; Allecia E Reid; Jessica Lewis; Trace S Kershaw; Sharon Schindler Rising; Jeannette R Ickovics
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  In a hard spot: providing group prenatal care in two urban clinics.

Authors:  Gina Novick; Lois S Sadler; Kathleen A Knafl; Nora E Groce; Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.372

4.  Vulnerable Women's Perceptions of Individual Versus Group Prenatal Care: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Erin Hetherington; Suzanne Tough; Deborah McNeil; Hamideh Bayrampour; Amy Metcalfe
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-11

5.  A qualitative descriptive study of the group prenatal care experience: perceptions of women with low-risk pregnancies and their midwives.

Authors:  Sarah D McDonald; Wendy Sword; Leyla E Eryuzlu; Anne B Biringer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Group prenatal care: effectiveness and challenges to implementation.

Authors:  Zafiro Andrade-Romo; Ileana B Heredia-Pi; Evelyn Fuentes-Rivera; Jacqueline Alcalde-Rabanal; Lourdes Bravo Bolaños Cacho; Laurie Jurkiewicz; Blair G Darney
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.106

7.  Shared medical appointments and patient-centered experience: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Kim H Wadsworth; Trevor G Archibald; Allison E Payne; Anita K Cleary; Byron L Haney; Adam S Hoverman
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Women´s expectations and evaluation of a maternal educational program.

Authors:  Juan Miguel Martínez; Miguel Delgado
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2013-09-30

9.  Rationale, development and feasibility of group antenatal care for immigrant women in Sweden: a study protocol for the Hooyo Project.

Authors:  Ulrika Byrskog; Malin Ahrne; Rhonda Small; Ewa Andersson; Birgitta Essen; Aisha Adan; Fardosa Hassen Ahmed; Karin Tesser; Yvonne Lidén; Monika Israelsson; Anna Åhman-Berndtsson; Erica Schytt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Vaccines and autism: a preliminary qualitative study on the beliefs of concerned mothers in Italy.

Authors:  Monica Pivetti; Giannino Melotti; Claudia Mancini
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2020-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.