Literature DB >> 21925235

The faces you remember: caricaturing shape facilitates brain processes reflecting the acquisition of new face representations.

Jürgen M Kaufmann1, Stefan R Schweinberger.   

Abstract

We report two experiments on the influence of spatial caricaturing on face learning and recognition. In the learning phase of Experiment 1, participants learned unfamiliar faces, half of which were caricatured at an exaggeration level of 30%. During learning we found increased N170, N250 and LPC and decreased P200 for caricatures. At test we observed better generalization to non-identical exemplars for faces learned as caricatures. At test, N250 was larger for caricatures. In Experiment 2, using more and stronger levels of caricaturing (0%=veridical, 35% and 70%), we replicated and extended main findings of Experiment 1 and found a clear learning advantage for caricatures. ERP and performance effects were directly related to the level of caricaturing. Overall, the present results suggest that (i) distinctive shape information is particularly informative to form new face representations for unfamiliar faces, and (ii) this formation of new representations is reflected by an increase in occipito-temporal negativity that is most prominent in the time range of the P200 and N250 components.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21925235     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  18 in total

1.  Caricature generalization benefits for faces learned with enhanced idiosyncratic shape or texture.

Authors:  Marlena L Itz; Stefan R Schweinberger; Jürgen M Kaufmann
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  The early development of face processing--what makes faces special?

Authors:  Stefanie Hoehl; Stefanie Peykarjou
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.203

3.  What drives social in-group biases in face recognition memory? ERP evidence from the own-gender bias.

Authors:  Nicole Wolff; Kathleen Kemter; Stefan R Schweinberger; Holger Wiese
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Electrophysiological correlates of face-evoked person knowledge.

Authors:  JohnMark Taylor; Zarrar Shehzad; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Asymmetric neural responses for facial expressions and anti-expressions.

Authors:  O Scott Gwinn; Courtney N Matera; Sean F O'Neil; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  The own-age bias in face memory is unrelated to differences in attention--evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Markus F Neumann; Albert End; Stefanie Luttmann; Stefan R Schweinberger; Holger Wiese
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Attention to individual identities modulates face processing.

Authors:  María Ruz; Clara Aranda; Beatriz R Sarmiento; Daniel Sanabria
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Distinct neural processes for the perception of familiar versus unfamiliar faces along the visual hierarchy revealed by EEG.

Authors:  Elliot Collins; Amanda K Robinson; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Adaptor identity modulates adaptation effects in familiar face identification and their neural correlates.

Authors:  Christian Walther; Stefan R Schweinberger; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Face distortion aftereffects evoked by featureless first-order stimulus configurations.

Authors:  Pál Vakli; Kornél Németh; Márta Zimmer; Stefan R Schweinberger; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.