Literature DB >> 21924483

On the early left-anterior negativity (ELAN) in syntax studies.

Karsten Steinhauer1, John E Drury.   

Abstract

Within the framework of Friederici's (2002) neurocognitive model of sentence processing, the early left anterior negativity (ELAN) in event-related potentials (ERPs) has been claimed to be a brain marker of syntactic first-pass parsing. As ELAN components seem to be exclusively elicited by word category violations (phrase structure violations), they have been taken as strong empirical support for syntax-first models of sentence processing and have gained considerable impact on psycholinguistic theory in a variety of domains. The present article reviews relevant ELAN studies and raises a number of serious issues concerning the reliability and validity of the findings. We also discuss how baseline problems and contextual factors can contribute to early ERP effects in studies examining word category violations. We conclude that--despite the apparent wealth of ELAN data--the functional significance of these findings remains largely unclear. The present paper does not claim to have falsified the existence of ELANs or syntax-related early frontal negativities. However, by separating facts from myths, the paper attempts to make a constructive contribution to how future ERP research in the area of syntax processing may better advance our understanding of online sentence comprehension.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21924483     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  50 in total

1.  The human brain processes syntax in the absence of conscious awareness.

Authors:  Laura Batterink; Helen J Neville
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Native-language N400 and P600 predict dissociable language-learning abilities in adults.

Authors:  Zhenghan Qi; Sara D Beach; Amy S Finn; Jennifer Minas; Calvin Goetz; Brian Chan; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Assessing the Role of Experimental Evidence for Interface Judgment: Licensing of Negative Polarity Items, Scalar Readings, and Focus.

Authors:  Anastasia Giannakidou; Urtzi Etxeberria
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-21

4.  Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns.

Authors:  Kara Morgan-Short; Karsten Steinhauer; Cristina Sanz; Michael T Ullman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network.

Authors:  Evelina Fedorenko; Idan Asher Blank; Matthew Siegelman; Zachary Mineroff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-06-20

6.  Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Melissa Troyer; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2014-12-08

7.  Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Clitic pronouns reveal the time course of processing gender and number in a second language.

Authors:  Eleonora Rossi; Judith F Kroll; Paola E Dussias
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 9.  Language and thought are not the same thing: evidence from neuroimaging and neurological patients.

Authors:  Evelina Fedorenko; Rosemary Varley
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Specific aspects of cognitive and language proficiency account for variability in neural indices of semantic and syntactic processing in children.

Authors:  Amanda Hampton Wray; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 6.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.