Literature DB >> 21921650

The self-protective nature of implicit identity and its relationship to weight bias and short-term weight loss.

Robert A Carels1, Nova Hinman, Afton Koball, Marissa Wagner Oehlhof, Amanda Gumble, Kathleen M Young.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Research suggests that making overly positive self-evaluations is the norm rather than the exception. However, unlike other stigmatized groups, overweight individuals do not exhibit a positive in-group social identity and instead exhibit significant explicit, implicit, and internalized weight bias. Therefore, it is not known whether overweight/obese individuals will evidence self-enhancement on general traits (good, attractive), or on traits inconsistent with fat stereotypes (disciplined, active, healthy eater), on an assessment of implicit attitudes. Similarly, it is not known whether these ratings will be associated with preexisting levels of weight bias, gender, or short-term weight loss.
METHODS: At baseline, 53 overweight/obese adults (BMI > 27 kg/m(2), mean BMI = 37.3 kg/m(2), SD = 6.6 kg/m(2), 89% Caucasian, and 77% female) participating in a weight loss intervention completed measures of explicit and internalized weight bias as well as implicit weight bias and identity (self-other comparisons).
RESULTS: Although participants evidenced significant anti-fat attitudes, they implicitly identified themselves as significantly thinner, better, more attractive, active, disciplined, and more likely to eat healthy than 'other' people. Compared to men, women were less likely to view themselves as thin and attractive relative to others. Greater implicit anti-fat bias and implicitly seeing the self as thin relative to others was associated with less short-term weight loss.
CONCLUSION: Despite evidence for explicit, implicit, and internalized weight bias, participants generally evidenced a positive implicit self-identity, including areas consistent with negative fat stereotypes.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21921650      PMCID: PMC6444827          DOI: 10.1159/000330809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Facts        ISSN: 1662-4025            Impact factor:   3.942


  18 in total

1.  A model of dual attitudes.

Authors:  T D Wilson; S Lindsey; T Y Schooler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction.

Authors:  John F Dovidio; Kerry Kawakami; Samuel L Gaertner
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-01

3.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.

Authors:  Anthony G Greenwald; Brian A Nosek; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-08

4.  Measuring self-esteem using the implicit association test: the role of the other.

Authors:  Andrew Karpinski
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-01

5.  Internalization of weight bias: Implications for binge eating and emotional well-being.

Authors:  Rebecca M Puhl; Corinne A Moss-Racusin; Marlene B Schwartz
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  Impact of perceived consensus on stereotypes about obese people: a new approach for reducing bias.

Authors:  Rebecca M Puhl; Marlene B Schwartz; Kelly D Brownell
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Obesity stigma in sexual relationships.

Authors:  Eunice Y Chen; Molly Brown
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2005-08

8.  Implicit anti-fat bias among health professionals: is anyone immune?

Authors:  B A Teachman; K D Brownell
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2001-10

9.  The influence of the stigma of obesity on overweight individuals.

Authors:  S S Wang; K D Brownell; T A Wadden
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2004-10

10.  Gender differences in implicit weight identity.

Authors:  Vishal P Grover; Pamela K Keel; Jason P Mitchell
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.861

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Health Consequences of Weight Stigma: Implications for Obesity Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Rebecca Puhl; Young Suh
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2015-06

Review 2.  Weight Bias: A Systematic Review of Characteristics and Psychometric Properties of Self-Report Questionnaires.

Authors:  Emilie Lacroix; Angela Alberga; Shelly Russell-Mathew; Lindsay McLaren; Kristin von Ranson
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 3.942

3.  Internalized weight bias: ratings of the self, normal weight, and obese individuals and psychological maladjustment.

Authors:  Robert A Carels; J Burmeister; M W Oehlhof; N Hinman; M LeRoy; E Bannon; A Koball; L Ashrafloun
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-02-10

4.  Obesity bias in training: attitudes, beliefs, and observations among advanced trainees in professional health disciplines.

Authors:  Rebecca M Puhl; Joerg Luedicke; Carlos M Grilo
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  The Multifaceted Nature of Weight-Related Self-Stigma: Validation of the Two-Factor Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS-2F).

Authors:  Angela Meadows; Suzanne Higgs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-04-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.