Literature DB >> 16162046

Impact of perceived consensus on stereotypes about obese people: a new approach for reducing bias.

Rebecca M Puhl1, Marlene B Schwartz, Kelly D Brownell.   

Abstract

In 3 experiments, the authors tested the effect of perceived social consensus on attitudes toward obese people. Participants completed self-report measures of attitudes toward obese people prior to and after manipulated consensus feedback depicting attitudes of others. In Study 1 (N=60), participants decreased negative and increased positive stereotypes after learning that others held more favorable attitudes toward obese people. In Study 2 (N=55), participants improved attitudes when they learned about favorable attitudes of obese people from an in-group versus an out-group source. In Study 3 (N=200), a consensus approach was compared with other stigma reduction methods. Social consensus feedback influenced participants' attitudes and beliefs about causes of obesity. Providing information about the uncontrollable causes of obesity and supposed scientific prevalence of traits also improved attitudes. (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16162046     DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.5.517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  44 in total

Review 1.  The portrayal of bariatric surgery in the UK print media.

Authors:  J M L Williamson; J A Rink; D H Hewin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Disability Discrimination and Obesity: The Big Questions?

Authors:  Stuart W Flint; Jeremé Snook
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2015-12

3.  Obesity Stigma and Bias.

Authors:  Sharon M Fruh; Joe Nadglowski; Heather R Hall; Sara L Davis; Errol D Crook; Kimberly Zlomke
Journal:  J Nurse Pract       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.767

4.  Effects of social contexts on overweight and normal-weight children's food intake.

Authors:  Sarah-Jeanne Salvy; Jennifer S Coelho; Elizabeth Kieffer; Leonard H Epstein
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-06-20

5.  A service learning based project to change implicit and explicit bias toward obese individuals in kinesiology pre-professionals.

Authors:  Paul B Rukavina; Weidong Li; Bo Shen; Haichun Sun
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.942

6.  Individual differences and weight bias: Do people with an anti-fat bias have a pro-thin bias?

Authors:  Robert A Carels; Dara R Musher-Eizenman
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2010-01-20

7.  Internalized weight stigma and its ideological correlates among weight loss treatment seeking adults.

Authors:  R A Carels; K M Young; C B Wott; J Harper; A Gumble; M Wagner Hobbs; A M Clayton
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2009 Jun-Sep       Impact factor: 4.652

8.  A randomized trial comparing two approaches to weight loss: differences in weight loss maintenance.

Authors:  Robert A Carels; Jacob M Burmeister; Afton M Koball; Marissa W Oehlhof; Nova Hinman; Michelle LeRoy; Erin Bannon; Lee Ashrafioun; Amy Storfer-Isser; Lynn A Darby; Amanda Gumble
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-01-24

9.  Brief intervention effective in reducing weight bias in medical students.

Authors:  Yasmin Poustchi; Norma S Saks; Alicja K Piasecki; Karissa A Hahn; Jeanne M Ferrante
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Stigmatization toward irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease in an online cohort.

Authors:  T H Taft; A Bedell; J Naftaly; L Keefer
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.