OBJECTIVE: This study examined gender differences in explicit and implicit attitudes toward overweight and explicit and implicit weight identity. METHOD: Normal weight women (n=22) and men (n=20) and overweight women (n=20) and men (n=21) completed the Implicit Association Test and portions of the Eating Disorders Questionnaire. RESULTS: Although explicit and implicit anti-fat attitudes were ubiquitous, gender differences emerged for weight identity. Both men and women provided accurate explicit appraisals of their weight status. However, men implicitly identified themselves as light regardless of actual weight status. Women's implicit weight identity was associated with their actual weight status, explicit weight appraisal, and implicit self-esteem. DISCUSSION: These findings may provide additional insight into why men are underrepresented among those seeking weight loss and why women are at increased risk for developing eating disorders. Copyright 2003 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined gender differences in explicit and implicit attitudes toward overweight and explicit and implicit weight identity. METHOD: Normal weight women (n=22) and men (n=20) and overweight women (n=20) and men (n=21) completed the Implicit Association Test and portions of the Eating Disorders Questionnaire. RESULTS: Although explicit and implicit anti-fat attitudes were ubiquitous, gender differences emerged for weight identity. Both men and women provided accurate explicit appraisals of their weight status. However, men implicitly identified themselves as light regardless of actual weight status. Women's implicit weight identity was associated with their actual weight status, explicit weight appraisal, and implicit self-esteem. DISCUSSION: These findings may provide additional insight into why men are underrepresented among those seeking weight loss and why women are at increased risk for developing eating disorders. Copyright 2003 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Robert A Carels; Nova Hinman; Afton Koball; Marissa Wagner Oehlhof; Amanda Gumble; Kathleen M Young Journal: Obes Facts Date: 2011-07-26 Impact factor: 3.942
Authors: Alexandra J Werntz; Shari A Steinman; Jeffrey J Glenn; Matthew K Nock; Bethany A Teachman Journal: J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry Date: 2016-03-03
Authors: Jeannie S Huang; Gregory J Norman; Marion F Zabinski; Karen Calfas; Kevin Patrick Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2007-01-05 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Ronette L Kolotkin; Ross D Crosby; Richard E Gress; Steven C Hunt; Scott G Engel; Ted D Adams Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2008-06-30 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Robert A Carels; Kathleen M Young; Carissa B Wott; Jessica Harper; Amanda Gumble; Marissa Wagner Oehlof; Anna Marie Clayton Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2009-06-23
Authors: Lisa M Ranzenhofer; Kelli M Columbo; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff; Lauren B Shomaker; Omni Cassidy; Brittany E Matheson; Ronette L Kolotkin; Jenna M Checchi; Margaret Keil; Jennifer R McDuffie; Jack A Yanovski Journal: Nutrients Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Wendy L Johnson-Taylor; Rachel A Fisher; Van S Hubbard; Pamela Starke-Reed; Paul S Eggers Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 6.457