Literature DB >> 21920957

Corvids can decide if a future exchange is worth waiting for.

Valerie Dufour1, Claudia A F Wascher, Anna Braun, Rachael Miller, Thomas Bugnyar.   

Abstract

Evidence for time-dependent calculations about future rewards is scarce in non-human animals. In non-human primates, only great apes are comparable with humans. Still, some species wait for several minutes to obtain a better reward in delayed exchange tasks. Corvids have been shown to match with non-human primates in some time-related tasks. Here, we investigate a delay of gratification in two corvid species, the carrion crow (Corvus corone) and the common raven (Corvus corax), in an exchange task. Results show that corvids success decreases quickly as delay increases, with a maximal delay of up to 320 s (more than 5 min). The decision to wait rests both on the quality of the prospective reward and the time required to obtain it. Corvids also apply tactics (placing the reward on the ground or caching it) that probably alleviate costs of waiting and distract their attention during waiting. These findings contrast previous results on delayed gratification in birds and indicate that some species may perform comparably to primates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21920957      PMCID: PMC3297375          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  18 in total

1.  Discounting of delayed food rewards in pigeons and rats: is there a magnitude effect?

Authors:  Leonard Green; Joel Myerson; Daniel D Holt; John R Slevin; Sara J Estle
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes.

Authors:  Nathan J Emery; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Natural choice in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  A Silberberg; J J Widholm; D Bresler; K Fujita; J R Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1998-04

4.  Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays.

Authors:  N J Emery; N S Clayton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The ecology and evolution of patience in two New World monkeys.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Stevens; Elizabeth V Hallinan; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Instrumental ideation in delay of gratification.

Authors:  W Mischel; B Underwood
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1974-12

7.  Impulsiveness without discounting: the ecological rationality hypothesis.

Authors:  David W Stephens; Benjamin Kerr; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Self-control in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): controlling for differential stimulus exposure.

Authors:  Allen D Szalda-Petree; Baine B Craft; Lori M Martin; Heide K Deditius-Island
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2004-02

9.  Accepting loss: the temporal limits of reciprocity in brown capuchin monkeys.

Authors:  A Ramseyer; M Pelé; V Dufour; C Chauvin; B Thierry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays.

Authors:  N S Clayton; A Dickinson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-09-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  32 in total

1.  Goffin cockatoos wait for qualitative and quantitative gains but prefer 'better' to 'more'.

Authors:  A M I Auersperg; I B Laumer; T Bugnyar
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Decision-making flexibility in New Caledonian crows, young children and adult humans in a multi-dimensional tool-use task.

Authors:  Rachael Miller; Romana Gruber; Anna Frohnwieser; Martina Schiestl; Sarah A Jelbert; Russell D Gray; Markus Boeckle; Alex H Taylor; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Behavioral responses to inequity in reward distribution and working effort in crows and ravens.

Authors:  Claudia A F Wascher; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Trading up: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) show self-control through their exchange behavior.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Mattea S Rossettie; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) can wait, when they choose to: a study with the hybrid delay task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Fabio Paglieri; Joseph M McIntyre; Elsa Addessi; William D Hopkins
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Waiting for better, not for more: corvids respond to quality in two delay maintenance tasks.

Authors:  Friederike Hillemann; Thomas Bugnyar; Kurt Kotrschal; Claudia A F Wascher
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Cuttlefish exert self-control in a delay of gratification task.

Authors:  Alexandra K Schnell; Markus Boeckle; Micaela Rivera; Nicola S Clayton; Roger T Hanlon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Carrion crows cannot overcome impulsive choice in a quantitative exchange task.

Authors:  Claudia A F Wascher; Valerie Dufour; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-17

9.  Carrion Crows and Azure-Winged Magpies Show No Prosocial Tendencies When Tested in a Token Transfer Paradigm.

Authors:  Lisa Horn; Jeroen S Zewald; Thomas Bugnyar; Jorg J M Massen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  You mob my owl, I'll mob yours: birds play tit-for-tat game.

Authors:  Tatjana Krama; Jolanta Vrublevska; Todd M Freeberg; Cecilia Kullberg; Markus J Rantala; Indrikis Krams
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.