| Literature DB >> 21917168 |
Rebecca P Duncan1, Lubov Nathanson, Alex C C Wilson.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A major goal of molecular evolutionary biology is to understand the fate and consequences of duplicated genes. In this context, aphids are intriguing because the newly sequenced pea aphid genome harbors an extraordinary number of lineage-specific gene duplications relative to other insect genomes. Though many of their duplicated genes may be involved in their complex life cycle, duplications in nutrient amino acid transporters appear to be associated rather with their essential amino acid poor diet and the intracellular symbiosis aphids rely on to compensate for dietary deficits. Past work has shown that some duplicated amino acid transporters are highly expressed in the specialized cells housing the symbionts, including a paralog of an aphid-specific expansion homologous to the Drosophila gene slimfast. Previous data provide evidence that these bacteriocyte-expressed transporters mediate amino acid exchange between aphids and their symbionts.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21917168 PMCID: PMC3231810 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Myzus persicae male-enriched nutrient amino acid transporters identified in microarray and annotations
| Contig IDa | GO terms | InterProScan IDs | Pfam domain | Fold change (Compared to)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1492 | GO:0006629: lipid metabolic process | IPR002293: Amino acid/polyamine transporter | AA_permease | 9.5-15.0 (AFL) |
| 3389 | GO:0006810: transport | IPR013057: Amino acid transporter, transmembrane | Aa_trans | 4.2 (AFS) |
| 4712 | Not annotated in Blast2GO | IPR013057: Amino acid transporter, transmembrane | Aa_trans | 5.5 (SF) |
| 4891 | GO:0005623: Cell | IPR013057: Amino acid transporter, transmembrane | Aa_trans | 9.3 (SF) |
| 8321 | GO:0009605: response to external stimulus | IPR002293: Amino acid/polyamine transporter | No significant | 5.7 (AFL) |
a Unigenes targeted in microarray were based on contigs assembled from ESTs generated in [40]. Contigs are available for download at http://www.aphidbase.com/aphidbase/downloads. See Additional file 4 for GenBank accession numbers corresponding to each contig.
bAFL: Asexual female at long day; AFS: Asexual female at short day; SF: Sexual female
Figure 1Phylogeny of the . Phylogeny was reconstructed in MrBayes v. 3.1.2. The aphid specific slimfast expansion is shown in the gray box. Posterior probability support for relationships is represented by branch width and style, as indicated in the key. Outgroup sequences were shown by Price et al., [9] to belong to a closely related clade of the slimfast gene family. Gene IDs beginning with "ACYPI" belong to A. pisum and gene IDs beginning with "contig" belong to M. persicae.
Acyrthosiphon pisum slimfast gene identifications
| ACYPI000537 | |
| ACYPI000584 | |
| ACYPI005472 | |
| ACYPI003523 | |
| ACYPI003240 | |
| ACYPI005156 | |
| ACYPI005118 | |
| ACYPI008904 | |
| ACYPI008323 | |
| ACYPI002633 |
aGene IDs are recognized in GenBank
Figure 2Quantitative gene expression analysis of . Gene expression profiles are shown for three A. pisum lineages (LSR1, 7A, 9-2-1). Transcript levels for each slimfast paralog were quantified by QPCR on cDNA for whole adult asexual females at long day (AFL) and short day (AFS), sexual females (SF), and males (M). The relative abundance of each paralog was normalized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH (ACYPI009769) and expression levels were standardized by converting them to z-scores and compiled into a heat map (for details, see methods). Expression was not quantified for ACYPIslif1-3 because sequence similarity and AT richness in the untranslated regions precluded our ability to design paralog-specific QPCR primers. Aphid line 9-2-1 does not produce asexual females at short day so we did not measure AFS expression for 9-2-1 (see methods for details). Yellow: z > 0; Blue: z < 0.
Figure 3Molecular evolution models. Strategy used to test for accelerated rates of evolution along branches leading to male-baised aphid slimfast paralogs. Tree topology is identical to the phylogeny in Figure 1. Each branch was assigned a ω category as indicated. The models tested are outlined below the phylogeny. The null model (one ratio) assumed equal ω across all branches. The first alternative model (two ratios) assumed one ω ratio for branches outside the aphid-specific slimfast expansion and a different ω ratio for branches within the expansion. The second alternative model (three ratios) assumed an additional, collective ω ratio for the branches leading to the three male-biased paralogs, and third alternative model (five ratios) assumed a distinct ω for each branch leading to a male-biased paralog or clade.
Molecular evolution results
| Model | ω value | -lnL | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One ratio | ω0 = 0.16415 | 26427.39 | --- | |
| Two ratios | ω0 = 0.00452 | 26300.94 | One ratio | ** |
| Three ratios | ω0 = 0.00452 | 26300.92 | Two ratios | NS |
| Five ratios | ω0 = 0.00451 | 26295.18 | Two ratios | ** |
aNull model against which the given model was tested using a likelihood ratio test.
NS = Not Significant
** indicates that P < 0.05