Literature DB >> 16169004

The significance of gut sucrase activity for osmoregulation in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum.

A J Karley1, D A Ashford, L M Minto, J Pritchard, A E Douglas.   

Abstract

The osmotic pressure of the body fluids of aphids is lower than in their diet of plant phloem sap. It is hypothesised that aphids reduce the osmotic pressure of ingested food by sucrase-mediated hydrolysis of dietary sucrose to glucose and fructose, and the polymerisation of glucose into oligosaccharides of low osmotic pressure per hexose unit. To test this hypothesis, the impact of the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose on the sugar relations and osmoregulation of aphids was explored. Acarbose inhibited sucrase activity in gut homogenates and the production of monosaccharides and oligosaccharides in the honeydew of live aphids. Acarbose caused an increase in the haemolymph osmotic pressure for aphids reared on a diet (containing 0.75 M sucrose) hyperosmotic to the haemolymph and not on the isoosmotic diet containing 0.2 M sucrose. It did not affect aphid feeding rate over 2 days, except at high concentrations on 0.75 M sucrose diet, and this may have been a secondary consequence of osmotic dysfunction. Acarbose-treated aphids died prematurely. With 5 microM dietary acarbose, mean survivorship on 0.2 M sucrose diet was 4.2 days, not significantly different from starved aphids, indicating that, although these aphids fed, they were deprived of utilisable carbon; and on 0.75 M sucrose diet, mean survivorship was just 2.8 days, probably as a consequence of osmotic failure. It is concluded that the aphid gut sucrase activity is essential for osmoregulation of aphids ingesting food hyperosmotic to their body fluids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16169004     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2005.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Insect Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1910            Impact factor:   2.354


  10 in total

Review 1.  Receptors of garlic (Allium sativum) lectins and their role in insecticidal action.

Authors:  Santosh K Upadhyay; Pradhyumna K Singh
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.371

2.  Species-specific chemical signatures in scale insect honeydew.

Authors:  Manpreet K Dhami; Robin Gardner-Gee; Jeremy Van Houtte; Silas G Villas-Bôas; Jacqueline R Beggs
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Adult Parasitoids of Honeydew-Producing Insects Prefer Honeydew Sugars to Cover their Energetic Needs.

Authors:  Marijke Lenaerts; Lamis Abid; Caroline Paulussen; Tim Goelen; Felix Wäckers; Hans Jacquemyn; Bart Lievens
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Genome sequence of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum.

Authors: 
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 5.  Toxins for transgenic resistance to hemipteran pests.

Authors:  Nanasaheb P Chougule; Bryony C Bonning
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Novel male-biased expression in paralogs of the aphid slimfast nutrient amino acid transporter expansion.

Authors:  Rebecca P Duncan; Lubov Nathanson; Alex C C Wilson
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Identification and expression analysis of aquaporins in the potato psyllid, Bactericera cockerelli.

Authors:  Freddy Ibanez; Joseph Hancock; Cecilia Tamborindeguy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A sweet story: Bean pod mottle virus transmission dynamics by Mexican bean beetles (Epilachna varivestis).

Authors:  Charlotte M Smith; Cassidy R Gedling; Kiana F Wiebe; Bryan J Cassone
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  The salivary gland proteome of root-galling grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch) feeding on Vitis spp.

Authors:  Markus W Eitle; James C Carolan; Michaela Griesser; Astrid Forneck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Physiological and Population Responses of Nilaparvata lugens after Feeding on Drought-Stressed Rice.

Authors:  Xinyan Liang; Lin Chen; Xiaoying Lan; Guangrong Liao; Ling Feng; Jitong Li; Wenyan Fan; Shuang Wang; Jinglan Liu
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.139

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.