Literature DB >> 12647080

[Surgical pain management. A Germany-wide survey including the effect of clinical guidelines].

E Neugebauer1, S Sauerland, V Keck, C Simanski, J Witte.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Over the last few years, various studies have aimed at improving the diagnosis and therapy of perioperative and posttraumatic pain.
METHODS: In an anonymous postal survey, 2,393 German surgical clinics were asked to describe several aspects of their clinical pain treatment. In order to assess the influence of interdisciplinary guidelines on surgical pain therapy, the results of this survey were compared to a survey from 1997.
RESULTS: The response rate was 30.8% ( n=738). Pain was measured quantitatively in 11.4% ( n=80) of hospitals, a figure which is unchanged since 1997. In pain treatment,however, some changes were discernible: while 46.6% of all hospitals in 1997 used patient-controlled analgesia often or occasionally, this proportion has risen to 64.5%.Both, the national acute pain guidelines and the WHO chronic pain guidelines were well known (71.3% and 74.7%) and accepted (98.8% and 98.5%, respectively). Among those surgeons who knew the national guidelines,93.7% reported that they used them clinically. In 149 hospitals (20.2%), local guidelines have been developed either anew or from existing guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: Although clinical guidelines are widely used, pain therapy in surgical patients has improved only marginally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12647080     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-003-0615-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  28 in total

1.  [Postoperative pain management after ambulatory surgery. A survey of anaesthesiologists].

Authors:  E A Lux; U Stamer; W Meissner; A Wiebalck
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Continuous local analgesic therapy reduces pain after radical inguinal/iliacal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Heiko Neuss; Martin Schomaker; Wieland Raue; Gerold Koplin; Oliver Haase
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  [The value of regional and general anaesthesia in orthopaedic surgery].

Authors:  O Vicent; M Hübler; S Kirschner; T Koch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [Current operative strategies for rotator cuff tears in German hospitals].

Authors:  C Lüring; O Diedrich; F X Köck; J Grifka; M Tingart
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Requirements for the organization of pain therapy in hospitals: interdepartmental comparison for pain management from the employees' perspective].

Authors:  J Erlenwein; G Ufer; A Hecke; M Pfingsten; M Bauer; F Petzke
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 6.  [Organisation of acute pain therapy].

Authors:  H Vogelsang; H Laubenthal
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  [IT-based clinical pathway as a routine tool in trauma surgery].

Authors:  L Homagk; O Deml; G O Hofmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Pain on the first postoperative day after head and neck cancer surgery.

Authors:  Johanna Inhestern; Jenny Schuerer; Christina Illge; Ira Thanos; Winfried Meissner; Gerd Fabian Volk; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  [Quality management in acute pain therapy: results from a survey of certified hospitals].

Authors:  A B Böhmer; M Poels; C Simanski; S Trojan; K Messer; M D Wirtz; E A M Neugebauer; F Wappler; R Joppich
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.107

10.  [Quality management during postoperative pain therapy].

Authors:  B Geissler; E Neugebauer; R Angster; J Witte Dagger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.