Alan L Shihadeh1, Thomas E Eissenberg. 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The global increase in tobacco smoking with a water pipe (hookah, narghile, or shisha) has made understanding its health consequences imperative. One key to developing this understanding is identifying and quantifying carcinogens and other toxicants present in water pipe smoke. To do so, the toxicant yield of machine-generated water pipe smoke has been measured. However, the relevance of toxicant yields of machine-generated smoke to actual human exposure has not been established. METHODS: In this study, we examined whether carbon monoxide (CO) and nicotine yields measured with a smoking machine programmed to replicate the puffing behavior of 31 human participants who smoked a water pipe could reliably predict these participants' blood-level exposure. In addition to CO and nicotine, yields of polyaromatic hydrocarbons, volatile aldehydes, nitric oxide (NO), and "tar" were measured. RESULTS: We found that when used in this puff-replicating manner, smoking machine yields are highly correlated with blood-level exposure (nicotine: r > 0.76, P < 0.001; CO: r > 0.78, P < 0.001). Total drawn smoke volume was the best predictor of toxicant yield and exposure, accounting for approximately 75% to 100% of the variability across participants in yields of NO, CO, volatile aldehydes, and tar, as well as blood-level CO and normalized nicotine. CONCLUSIONS: Machine-based methods can be devised in which smoke toxicant yields reliably track human exposure. IMPACT: This finding indicates the basic feasibility of valid analytic laboratory evaluation of tobacco products for regulatory purposes.
BACKGROUND: The global increase in tobacco smoking with a water pipe (hookah, narghile, or shisha) has made understanding its health consequences imperative. One key to developing this understanding is identifying and quantifying carcinogens and other toxicants present in water pipe smoke. To do so, the toxicant yield of machine-generated water pipe smoke has been measured. However, the relevance of toxicant yields of machine-generated smoke to actual human exposure has not been established. METHODS: In this study, we examined whether carbon monoxide (CO) and nicotine yields measured with a smoking machine programmed to replicate the puffing behavior of 31 humanparticipants who smoked a water pipe could reliably predict these participants' blood-level exposure. In addition to CO and nicotine, yields of polyaromatic hydrocarbons, volatile aldehydes, nitric oxide (NO), and "tar" were measured. RESULTS: We found that when used in this puff-replicating manner, smoking machine yields are highly correlated with blood-level exposure (nicotine: r > 0.76, P < 0.001; CO: r > 0.78, P < 0.001). Total drawn smoke volume was the best predictor of toxicant yield and exposure, accounting for approximately 75% to 100% of the variability across participants in yields of NO, CO, volatile aldehydes, and tar, as well as blood-level CO and normalized nicotine. CONCLUSIONS: Machine-based methods can be devised in which smoke toxicant yields reliably track human exposure. IMPACT: This finding indicates the basic feasibility of valid analytic laboratory evaluation of tobacco products for regulatory purposes.
Authors: Brian A Primack; Ariel Shensa; Kevin H Kim; Mary V Carroll; Mary T Hoban; E Victor Leino; Thomas Eissenberg; Kathleen H Dachille; Michael J Fine Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-05-28 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Gary A Giovino; Ann McNeill Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Marielle C Brinkman; Hyoshin Kim; Sydney M Gordon; Robyn R Kroeger; Iza L Reyes; Dawn M Deojay; Caleb Chitwood; Timothy E Lane; Pamela I Clark Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Brian A Primack; Mary V Carroll; Patricia M Weiss; Alan L Shihadeh; Ariel Shensa; Steven T Farley; Michael J Fine; Thomas Eissenberg; Smita Nayak Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2016 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Alison Breland; Robert L Balster; Caroline Cobb; Pebbles Fagan; Jonathan Foulds; J Randy Koch; Thokozeni Lipato; Najat Saliba; Alan Shihadeh; Shumei Sun; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Am Psychol Date: 2019-04
Authors: Aruni Bhatnagar; Wasim Maziak; Thomas Eissenberg; Kenneth D Ward; George Thurston; Brian A King; Erin L Sutfin; Caroline O Cobb; Merlyn Griffiths; Larry B Goldstein; Mary Rezk-Hanna Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Soha Talih; Zainab Balhas; Thomas Eissenberg; Rola Salman; Nareg Karaoghlanian; Ahmad El Hellani; Rima Baalbaki; Najat Saliba; Alan Shihadeh Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Kevin M Walton; David B Abrams; William C Bailey; David Clark; Gregory N Connolly; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Thomas E Eissenberg; Michael C Fiore; Maciej L Goniewicz; Lynne Haverkos; Stephen S Hecht; Jack E Henningfield; John R Hughes; Cheryl A Oncken; Lisa Postow; Jed E Rose; Kay L Wanke; Lucie Yang; Dorothy K Hatsukami Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-10-21 Impact factor: 4.244