Literature DB >> 10639511

Doses of nicotine and lung carcinogens delivered to cigarette smokers.

M V Djordjevic1, S D Stellman, E Zang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoke yields of tar and nicotine obtained under the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)-specified machine-smoking protocol (35-mL puff volume drawn for 2 seconds once per minute) may not accurately reflect the delivery of toxins and carcinogens to the smoker. We conducted this study to obtain more realistic estimates of exposure to components of cigarette smoke that affect lung cancer risk.
METHODS: We used a pressure transducer system to evaluate puffing characteristics for 133 smokers of cigarettes rated by the FTC at 1.2 mg of nicotine or less (56 smokers of low-yield cigarettes [</=0.8 mg of nicotine per cigarette] and 77 smokers of medium-yield cigarettes [0.9-1.2 mg of nicotine per cigarette]). We programmed measurements from a randomly chosen subset of 72 of these smokers into a piston-type machine to generate smoke from each smoker's usual brand of cigarettes for assays of nicotine, carbon monoxide, tar, and the lung cancer-causing agents 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone and benzo[a]pyrene. The FTC protocol was also used to assess levels of targeted components in the 11 brands most frequently smoked by study subjects.
RESULTS: Compared with the FTC protocol values, smokers of low- and medium-yield brands took in statistically significantly larger puffs (48.6 and 44.1 mL, respectively) at statistically significantly shorter intervals (21.3 and 18.5 seconds, respectively), and they drew larger total smoke volumes than specified in the FTC parameters. They received, respectively, 2.5 and 2.2 times more nicotine and 2.6 and 1.9 times more tar than FTC-derived amounts, as well as about twofold higher levels of benzo[a]pyrene and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone. Smokers of medium-yield cigarettes compared with smokers of low-yield cigarettes received higher doses of all components.
CONCLUSIONS: The FTC protocol underestimates nicotine and carcinogen doses to smokers and overestimates the proportional benefit of low-yield cigarettes. Thus, FTC-based nicotine medication doses prescribed/recommended for smoking cessation may need to be reassessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10639511     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.2.106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  89 in total

1.  Changing the future of tobacco marketing by understanding the mistakes of the past: lessons from "Lights".

Authors:  D Canova; M L Myers; D E Smith; J Slade
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Beliefs about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes and efforts to change those beliefs: an overview of early efforts and published research.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; J L Pillitteri
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Effect of health messages about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes on beliefs and quitting intent.

Authors:  S Shiffman; J L Pillitteri; S L Burton; J M Rohay; J G Gitchell
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Cigarette nicotine yields and nicotine intake among Japanese male workers.

Authors:  K Ueda; I Kawachi; M Nakamura; H Nogami; N Shirokawa; S Masui; A Okayama; A Oshima
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Mentholated cigarettes and smoking habits in whites and blacks.

Authors:  J E Muscat; J P Richie; S D Stellman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  The fallacy of "light" cigarettes.

Authors:  Nancy A Rigotti; Hilary A Tindle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-13

8.  Shisha guidance for GPs: eliciting the hidden history.

Authors:  Mohammed Jawad; Husain Khaki; Fiona Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Water-pipe tobacco smoking among middle and high school students in Arizona.

Authors:  Brian A Primack; Michele Walsh; Cindy Bryce; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 10.  Waterpipe tobacco smoking: an emerging health crisis in the United States.

Authors:  Caroline Cobb; Kenneth D Ward; Wasim Maziak; Alan L Shihadeh; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2010 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.