Literature DB >> 2190502

A randomized double-blind comparison of epidural versus intravenous fentanyl infusion for analgesia after cesarean section.

D J Ellis1, W L Millar, L S Reisner.   

Abstract

The authors conducted a randomized double-blind controlled study comparing groups of patients receiving iv or epidural fentanyl infusions to determine whether, at comparable levels of analgesia, 1) the severity of side effects was different; and 2) plasma fentanyl concentrations differed between the two groups. Twenty-eight ASA physical status 2 women scheduled to undergo elective cesarean section were randomized into two groups to either receive fentanyl intravenously and saline epidurally or fentanyl epidurally and saline intravenously. After delivery of the infants under epidural anesthesia, each patient received a bolus of fentanyl 1.5 microgram/kg either intravenously or epidurally, and a fentanyl infusion was begun via the same route. Concurrently, a saline bolus and infusion were given via the alternate route. The rates of the fentanyl and saline infusions were adjusted until each patient was comfortable. Patients rated their pain, nausea, and pruritus on visual analogue scales. Sedation was evaluated by an observer. Respiratory depression was evaluated by end-tidal PCO2. Data were analyzed by unpaired two-tail t tests. Plasma fentanyl concentrations were measured at 12 and 24 h. Three patients in the iv group were dropped from the study because of inadequate pain relief. For the remaining 25 patients, similar infusion rates of fentanyl were required to produce similar levels of analgesia at 12 and 24 h. The severity of nausea, pruritus and sedation, and end-tidal PCO2 were similar for both groups. The plasma concentrations of fentanyl were significantly greater in those who received iv fentanyl at 12 h but not at 24 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2190502     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199006000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  12 in total

Review 1.  The evolving role of spinal agents in acute pain.

Authors:  James W Heitz; Eugene R Viscusi
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2005-02

2.  Zyklophin, a short-acting kappa opioid antagonist, induces scratching in mice.

Authors:  K M Dimattio; T V Yakovleva; J V Aldrich; A Cowan; L Y Liu-Chen
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Nystagmus caused by epidural fentanyl.

Authors:  Byung Gun Lim; Jea Yeun Lee; Heezoo Kim; Dong Kyu Lee; Mi Kyoung Lee
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Epidural opioids for post-thoracotomy pain.

Authors:  R P Grant
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Patient-controlled lumbar epidural fentanyl compared with patient-controlled intravenous fentanyl for post-thoracotomy pain.

Authors:  R P Grant; J F Dolman; J A Harper; S A White; D G Parsons; K G Evans; C P Merrick
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 6.  Neuraxial opioid-induced itch and its pharmacological antagonism.

Authors:  Mei-Chuan Ko
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2015

7.  Differential effects of opioid-related ligands and NSAIDs in nonhuman primate models of acute and inflammatory pain.

Authors:  Devki D Sukhtankar; Heeseung Lee; Kenner C Rice; Mei-Chuan Ko
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Epidural opioid analgesia after caesarean section: a comparison of patient-controlled analgesia with meperidine and single bolus injection of morphine.

Authors:  O P Rosaeg; M P Lindsay
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Effect of intrathecal midazolam in the severity of pain in cesarean section: a randomized controlled trail.

Authors:  A Karbasfrushan; K Farhadi; J Amini-Saman; S Bazargan-Hejazi; A Ahmadi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 0.611

Review 10.  Regional anesthesia for major vascular surgery.

Authors:  D P O'Toole; A J Cunningham
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.