Literature DB >> 21904859

Comparison of sterilization of reusable endoscopic biopsy forceps by autoclaving and ethylene oxide gas.

Jai Hoon Yoon1, Byung Chul Yoon, Hang Lak Lee, Jun Kyu Lee, Yong-Tae Kim, Dong Ho Lee, Il Ju Choi, Don Haeng Lee, Dong Hee Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Every country has standardized reprocessing guidelines for reducing the risk of microorganism transmission via reusable biopsy forceps. Sterilization is performed either by autoclaving or with the use of ethylene oxide (EO) gas. However, there are no clear standard global recommendations. The aim of this study was to determine whether EO gas or autoclaving is a safer and more effective method for the sterilization of reusable forceps.
METHODS: This was a prospective study conducted at multiple tertiary referral centers. Seventy reusable biopsy forceps that had been reused at least 20 times each were collected from six endoscopy centers. In all, 61 forceps from five centers were sterilized using EO gas, and the nine forceps from the remaining center were placed in an autoclave. We performed real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and hepatitis B virus and performed bacterial cultures on the reusable forceps, which were cut into 2- to 3-cm sections. The forceps were also scanned with an electron microscope (EM) to detect surface damage and contamination.
RESULTS: Escherichia coli bacteria were cultured from 2 of the 61 (3.3%) reusable biopsy forceps sterilized with EO gas. On EM scanning, abundant debris and tissue materials remained on the cup surfaces of the reused biopsy forceps and on their inner wires. No microorganisms were found on the autoclaved forceps.
CONCLUSIONS: Sterilization with EO gas may be inadequate because the complicated structure of the forceps may interfere with sterilization. Therefore, for optimum safety, reusable biopsy forceps should be sterilized by autoclaving.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21904859     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-011-1884-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  26 in total

1.  A cost and performance evaluation of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy.

Authors:  R Yang; S Ng; M Nichol; L Laine
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Advantages of reusable accessories.

Authors:  H C Wolfsen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2000-04

3.  Reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscopic accessories.

Authors:  K Ogoshi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.029

Review 4.  Disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscopes and accessories.

Authors:  R K Tandon
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.029

5.  Reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective evaluation of cleaning, function, adequacy of tissue specimen, and durability.

Authors:  R A Kozarek; F M Attia; S E Sumida; S L Raltz; S K Roach; D B Schembre; J J Brandabur; T J Ball; M Gluck; G C Jiranek; D J Patterson; J E Bredfeldt; M Gelfand; S E McCormick; D B Drajpuch; D K Moran
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis C virus during colonoscopy.

Authors:  J P Bronowicki; V Venard; C Botté; N Monhoven; I Gastin; L Choné; H Hudziak; B Rihn; C Delanoë; A LeFaou; M A Bigard; P Gaucher; B Rhin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Impact of FDA policy change on the reuse of single-use medical devices in Michigan hospitals.

Authors:  Michelle J Alfa; Janet Castillo
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  Adequately washed bronchoscope does not induce false-positive amplification tests on bronchial aspirates in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  Tae Sun Shim; Hyun Sook Chi; Sang Do Lee; Younsuck Koh; Woo Sung Kim; Dong Soon Kim; Won Dong Kim
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Quantitation of hepatitis B virus genomic DNA by real-time detection PCR.

Authors:  A Abe; K Inoue; T Tanaka; J Kato; N Kajiyama; R Kawaguchi; S Tanaka; M Yoshiba; M Kohara
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Salmonella newport infections transmitted by fiberoptic colonoscopy.

Authors:  D M Dwyer; E G Klein; G R Istre; M G Robinson; D A Neumann; G A McCoy
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating Quality and Adequacy of Gastrointestinal Samples Collected using Reusable or Disposable Forceps.

Authors:  J A Cartwright; T L Hill; S Smith; D Shaw
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.333

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.