Literature DB >> 10699769

A cost and performance evaluation of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy.

R Yang1, S Ng, M Nichol, L Laine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biopsy forceps are widely used in gastrointestinal endoscopy, and yet few data exist on the usage and costs associated with disposable versus reusable forceps.
METHODS: We prospectively measured the costs and operational performance of disposable and reusable forceps in 200 biopsy sessions; 100 sessions were performed using disposable forceps and 100 sessions were performed using reusable forceps. Total cost per use of the reusable forceps, including acquisition costs plus the costs of reprocessing per established guidelines, was determined. At the end of the study, the reusable forceps were disassembled to determine the cause of mechanical failures.
RESULTS: The total cost per use of the disposable forceps was $38. For the reusable forceps, the acquisition cost per forceps was $415 and the total reprocessing cost was $16.56 +/- 0.07 per forceps. For 10, 15 and 20 uses, reusable forceps costs were $58.06, $44.23, and $37.31, respectively. Reusable forceps malfunction at 11 to 15 uses was 5%; at 16 to 20 uses was 25%; and at 21 to 25 uses reached 80% (p < 0.001). Dismantling of the reusable forceps at the end of the study demonstrated coiled sheath kinking, rust in the forceps closure mechanism, bent spikes, and biomaterial contamination.
CONCLUSIONS: Up to 15 to 20 uses, disposable and reusable forceps costs were similar. If reusable forceps are used more than 20 times, then they are less expensive. However, in this range of uses, reusable biopsy forceps performance diminishes. With disposable biopsy forceps costing less than $40, cost differences between reusable and disposable forceps are minimal.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10699769     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70353-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of air-coupled balloon esophageal and anorectal manometry catheters with solid-state esophageal manometry and water-perfused anorectal manometry catheters.

Authors:  John C Fang; Kristen Hilden; Ashok K Tuteja; Kathryn A Peterson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Comparison of sterilization of reusable endoscopic biopsy forceps by autoclaving and ethylene oxide gas.

Authors:  Jai Hoon Yoon; Byung Chul Yoon; Hang Lak Lee; Jun Kyu Lee; Yong-Tae Kim; Dong Ho Lee; Il Ju Choi; Don Haeng Lee; Dong Hee Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Performance and cost of disposable biopsy forceps in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison with reusable biopsy forceps.

Authors:  Chul-Hyun Lim; Myung-Gyu Choi; Won Chul Kim; Jin Soo Kim; Yu Kyung Cho; Jae Myung Park; In Seok Lee; Sang Woo Kim; Kyu Yong Choi; In-Sik Chung
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2012-03-31

Review 4.  Current State of Surgical Lighting.

Authors:  Jahnavi Curlin; Charles K Herman
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2020-06-19

5.  Comparison of 2 differently sized endoscopic biopsy forceps in the evaluation of intestinal disease in cats.

Authors:  Enrico Bottero; Emanuele Mussi; Camillo Pieramati; Davide De Lorenzi; Serenella Silvestri; Elvio Lepri
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Evaluating Quality and Adequacy of Gastrointestinal Samples Collected using Reusable or Disposable Forceps.

Authors:  J A Cartwright; T L Hill; S Smith; D Shaw
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.333

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.