Literature DB >> 21904023

Non-invasive measurement of local pulse pressure by pulse wave-based ultrasound manometry (PWUM).

J Vappou1, J Luo, K Okajima, M Di Tullio, E E Konofagou.   

Abstract

Central blood pressure (CBP) has been established as a relevant indicator of cardiovascular disease. Despite its significance, CBP remains particularly challenging to measure in standard clinical practice. The objective of this study is to introduce pulse wave-based ultrasound manometry (PWUM) as a simple-to-use, non-invasive ultrasound-based method for quantitative measurement of the central pulse pressure. Arterial wall displacements are estimated using radiofrequency ultrasound signals acquired at high frame rates and the pulse pressure waveform is estimated using both the distension waveform and the local pulse wave velocity. The method was tested on the abdominal aorta of 11 healthy subjects (age 35.7 ± 16 y.o.). PWUM pulse pressure measurements were compared to those obtained by radial applanation tonometry using a commercial system. The average intra-subject variability of the pulse pressure amplitude was found to be equal to 4.2 mmHg, demonstrating good reproducibility of the method. Excellent correlation was found between the waveforms obtained by PWUM and those obtained by tonometry in all subjects (0.94 < r < 0.98). A significant bias of 4.7 mmHg was found between PWUM and tonometry. PWUM is a highly translational method that can be easily integrated in clinical ultrasound imaging systems. It provides an estimate of the pulse pressure waveform at the imaged location, and may offer therefore the possibility to estimate the pulse pressure at different arterial sites. Future developments include the validation of the method against invasive estimates on patients, as well as its application to other large arteries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21904023      PMCID: PMC4005495          DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/32/10/012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  26 in total

1.  1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. Guidelines Subcommittee.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Simultaneous assessment of diameter and pressure waveforms in the carotid artery.

Authors:  Jan M Meinders; Arnold P G Hoeks
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Quantitative assessment of arterial wall biomechanical properties using shear wave imaging.

Authors:  Mathieu Couade; Mathieu Pernot; Claire Prada; Emmanuel Messas; Joseph Emmerich; Patrick Bruneval; Aline Criton; Mathias Fink; Mickael Tanter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  A novel noninvasive technique for pulse-wave imaging and characterization of clinically-significant vascular mechanical properties in vivo.

Authors:  Kana Fujikura; Jianwen Luo; Viktor Gamarnik; Mathieu Pernot; Royd Fukumoto; Martin David Tilson; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.578

5.  Pulse wave imaging for noninvasive and quantitative measurement of arterial stiffness in vivo.

Authors:  Jonathan Vappou; Jianwen Luo; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  Reproducibility of pulse wave velocity and augmentation index measured by pulse wave analysis.

Authors:  I B Wilkinson; S A Fuchs; I M Jansen; J C Spratt; G D Murray; J R Cockcroft; D J Webb
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure. Validation of generalized transfer function.

Authors:  C H Chen; E Nevo; B Fetics; P H Pak; F C Yin; W L Maughan; D A Kass
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Central pulse pressure and mortality in end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Michel E Safar; Jacques Blacher; Bruno Pannier; Alain P Guerin; Sylvain J Marchais; Pierre-Marie Guyonvarc'h; Gérard M London
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 9.  An analysis of the relationship between central aortic and peripheral upper limb pressure waves in man.

Authors:  M Karamanoglu; M F O'Rourke; A P Avolio; R P Kelly
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Factors associated with survival to 75 years of age in middle-aged men and women. The Framingham Study.

Authors:  R J Goldberg; M Larson; D Levy
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-03-11
View more
  6 in total

1.  Smartphone-based blood pressure monitoring via the oscillometric finger-pressing method.

Authors:  Anand Chandrasekhar; Chang-Sei Kim; Mohammed Naji; Keerthana Natarajan; Jin-Oh Hahn; Ramakrishna Mukkamala
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Mapping the longitudinal wall stiffness heterogeneities within intact canine aortas using Pulse Wave Imaging (PWI) ex vivo.

Authors:  Danial Shahmirzadi; Prathyush Narayanan; Ronny X Li; William W Qaqish; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Noninvasive Evaluation of Varying Pulse Pressures in vivo Using Brachial Sphymomanometry, Applanation Tonometry, and Pulse Wave Ultrasound Manometry.

Authors:  Ronny X Li; Ada Ip; Elena Sanz-Miralles; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Artery Res       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 0.597

4.  An inverse approach to determining spatially varying arterial compliance using ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Matthew Mcgarry; Ronny Li; Iason Apostolakis; Pierre Nauleau; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Bio-Impedance Sensor for Real-Time Artery Diameter Waveform Assessment.

Authors:  Mugeb Al-Harosh; Marat Yangirov; Dmitry Kolesnikov; Sergey Shchukin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Arterial mechanical motion estimation based on a semi-rigid body deformation approach.

Authors:  Pablo Guzman; Ghassan Hamarneh; Rafael Ros; Eduardo Ros
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.