Literature DB >> 14998666

Simultaneous assessment of diameter and pressure waveforms in the carotid artery.

Jan M Meinders1, Arnold P G Hoeks.   

Abstract

Simultaneous assessment of diameter and pressure waveforms allows the calculation of the incremental compliance, distensibility, pulse wave velocity and elastic modulus as function of the distending pressure. However, the waveforms must be obtained at the same position and acquired and processed with the same filter characteristics to circumvent possible temporal and spatial changes in amplitude and phase. In this paper, arterial diameter waveforms are assessed by means of ultrasound (US) and converted to pressure using an empirically derived exponential relationship between pressure and arterial cross-section. The derived pressure waveform is calibrated to brachial end diastolic and mean arterial pressure by iteratively changing the wall rigidity coefficient (i.e., the exponential power). Because pressure is derived directly from arterial cross-section, no phase delay is introduced due to spatial separation or different filter characteristics. The method was evaluated for the left common carotid artery of 51 healthy subjects ranging in age from 22 to 75 years old. In healthy subjects, the carotid pulse pressure is 29% lower than the brachial pulse pressure. Continuous assessment of arterial properties confirms that pulse-wave velocity and incremental elastic modulus increase, whereas distensibility and compliance decrease, as function of increasing distending blood pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14998666     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2003.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  30 in total

Review 1.  Arterial stiffness: basic concepts and measurement techniques.

Authors:  Julio A Chirinos
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Material property estimation for tubes and arteries using ultrasound radiation force and analysis of propagating modes.

Authors:  Miguel Bernal; Ivan Nenadic; Matthew W Urban; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Ultrasound detection of altered placental vascular morphology based on hemodynamic pulse wave reflection.

Authors:  Anum Rahman; Yu-Qing Zhou; Yohan Yee; Jun Dazai; Lindsay S Cahill; John Kingdom; Christopher K Macgowan; John G Sled
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Feasibility of dual Doppler velocity measurements to estimate volume pulsations of an arterial segment.

Authors:  Craig J Hartley; Anilkumar K Reddy; Sridhar Madala; Mark L Entman; George E Taffet
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 5.  Doppler velocity measurements from large and small arteries of mice.

Authors:  Craig J Hartley; Anilkumar K Reddy; Sridhar Madala; Mark L Entman; Lloyd H Michael; George E Taffet
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Measurement of brachial artery endothelial function using a standard blood pressure cuff.

Authors:  Jonathan S Maltz; Geoffrey H Tison; Hugh F Alley; Thomas F Budinger; Christopher D Owens; Jeffrey Olgin
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.833

7.  Patient-specific blood pressure correction technique for arterial stiffness: evaluation in a cohort on anti-angiogenic medication.

Authors:  Bart Spronck; Tammo Delhaas; Anouk Gw De Lepper; Julie Giroux; François Goldwasser; Pierre Boutouyrie; Maureen Alivon; Koen D Reesink
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.872

8.  Reflected hemodynamic waves influence the pattern of Doppler ultrasound waveforms along the umbilical arteries.

Authors:  John G Sled; Greg Stortz; Lindsay S Cahill; Natasha Milligan; Viji Ayyathurai; Lena Serghides; Eric Morgen; Viola Seravalli; Cassandra Delp; Cyrethia McShane; Ahmet Baschat; John Kingdom; Christopher K Macgowan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.733

9.  Non-invasive measurement of local pulse pressure by pulse wave-based ultrasound manometry (PWUM).

Authors:  J Vappou; J Luo; K Okajima; M Di Tullio; E E Konofagou
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.833

10.  Noninvasive Evaluation of Varying Pulse Pressures in vivo Using Brachial Sphymomanometry, Applanation Tonometry, and Pulse Wave Ultrasound Manometry.

Authors:  Ronny X Li; Ada Ip; Elena Sanz-Miralles; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Artery Res       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 0.597

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.