Literature DB >> 24661816

How we determined the most reliable solid medium for studying treatment of tuberculosis.

Charles M Heilig1, Pei-Jean I Feng2, Moses L Joloba3, John L Johnson4, Karen Morgan5, Phineas Gitta5, W Henry Boom4, Harriet Mayanja-Kizza5, Kathleen D Eisenach6, Lorna Bozeman2, Stefan V Goldberg2.   

Abstract

Phase 2 clinical trials for tuberculosis (TB) treatment require reliable culture methods to determine presence or absence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) over the course of therapy, as these trials are based primarily on bacteriological endpoints. We evaluate which of 5 solid media is most reliable: Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) egg-base medium and 4 Middlebrook agar media (nonselective 7H10 and 7H11 and selective 7H10 and 7H11). We analyze 393 specimens from 50 HIV-negative Ugandan adults with newly-diagnosed, pulmonary TB and high acid-fast bacillus smear grade. Specimens were collected every 2-4 weeks during the first 12 weeks of therapy. We compare the results for each culture to 2 composite reference standards--one that was deemed positive if any solid culture was positive for Mtb and another based on latent-class analysis. Both reference standards established that the 2 selective Middlebrook media most reliably determine the presence or absence of Mtb (P < 0.003), largely because of their lower contamination rates. We also showed that results on Middlebrook media were similar to each other, while LJ was most frequently discordant. Contaminated results appeared more likely to be truly negative than to harbor undetected Mtb. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Composite reference standard; Latent-class model; Lowenstein–Jensen culture medium; Middlebrook agar culture media; Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24661816      PMCID: PMC4070601          DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2014.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)        ISSN: 1472-9792            Impact factor:   3.131


  17 in total

1.  Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test.

Authors:  T A Alonzo; M S Pepe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Diagnostic test analyses in search of their gold standard: latent class analyses with random effects.

Authors:  E Goetghebeur; J Liinev; M Boelaert; P Van der Stuyft
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America: treatment of tuberculosis.

Authors:  Henry M Blumberg; William J Burman; Richard E Chaisson; Charles L Daley; Sue C Etkind; Lloyd N Friedman; Paula Fujiwara; Malgosia Grzemska; Philip C Hopewell; Michael D Iseman; Robert M Jasmer; Venkatarama Koppaka; Richard I Menzies; Richard J O'Brien; Randall R Reves; Lee B Reichman; Patricia M Simone; Jeffrey R Starke; Andrew A Vernon
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Hui and Walter's latent-class reference-free approach may be more useful in assessing agreement than diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Philippe Bertrand; Jacques Bénichou; Philippe Grenier; Claude Chastang
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods.

Authors:  A W S Rutjes; J B Reitsma; A Coomarasamy; K S Khan; P M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 6.  Evaluation of diagnostic tests without gold standards.

Authors:  S L Hui; X H Zhou
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  The latent class model for multiple binary screening tests.

Authors:  T S Lau
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Effects of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  V L Torrance-Rynard; S D Walter
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  The potential of latent class analysis in diagnostic test validation for canine Leishmania infantum infection.

Authors:  M Boelaert; K Aoun; J Liinev; E Goetghebeur; P Van der Stuyft
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.451

10.  What is the most reliable solid culture medium for tuberculosis treatment trials?

Authors:  Moses L Joloba; John L Johnson; Pei-Jean I Feng; Lorna Bozeman; Stefan V Goldberg; Karen Morgan; Phineas Gitta; Henry W Boom; Charles M Heilig; Harriet Mayanja-Kizza; Kathleen D Eisenach
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.131

View more
  2 in total

1.  Medium matters: modeling the impact of solid medium performance on tuberculosis trial sample size requirements.

Authors:  M G Johnson; J E Stout; D A Benator; W C Whitworth; D P Holland
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex Yield and Contamination Rates using Lowenstein-Jensen with and without Antibiotics in Western Kenya.

Authors:  A Okumu; K McCarthy; J Orwa; J Williamson; S Musau; H Alexander; S Cavanaugh; S Modi; K Cain
Journal:  J Med Sci Clin Res       Date:  2017
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.