Literature DB >> 21900269

The population genetics of X-autosome synthetic lethals and steriles.

Joseph Lachance1, Norman A Johnson, John R True.   

Abstract

Epistatic interactions are widespread, and many of these interactions involve combinations of alleles at different loci that are deleterious when present in the same individual. The average genetic environment of sex-linked genes differs from that of autosomal genes, suggesting that the population genetics of interacting X-linked and autosomal alleles may be complex. Using both analytical theory and computer simulations, we analyzed the evolutionary trajectories and mutation-selection balance conditions for X-autosome synthetic lethals and steriles. Allele frequencies follow a set of fundamental trajectories, and incompatible alleles are able to segregate at much higher frequencies than single-locus expectations. Equilibria exist, and they can involve fixation of either autosomal or X-linked alleles. The exact equilibrium depends on whether synthetic alleles are dominant or recessive and whether fitness effects are seen in males, females, or both sexes. When single-locus fitness effects and synthetic incompatibilities are both present, population dynamics depend on the dominance of alleles and historical contingency (i.e., whether X-linked or autosomal mutations occur first). Recessive synthetic lethality can result in high-frequency X-linked alleles, and dominant synthetic lethality can result in high-frequency autosomal alleles. Many X-autosome incompatibilities in natural populations may be cryptic, appearing to be single-locus effects because one locus is fixed. We also discuss the implications of these findings with respect to standing genetic variation and the origins of Haldane's rule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21900269      PMCID: PMC3213362          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.131276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  45 in total

Review 1.  Principles for the buffering of genetic variation.

Authors:  J L Hartman; B Garvik; L Hartwell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans.

Authors:  M W Nachman; S L Crowell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  X-autosome incompatibilities in Drosophila melanogaster: tests of Haldane's rule and geographic patterns within species.

Authors:  Joseph Lachance; John R True
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Evolution of postmating reproductive isolation: the composite nature of Haldane's rule and its genetic bases.

Authors:  C I Wu; A W Davis
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  The genetic signature of conditional expression.

Authors:  J David Van Dyken; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Synthetic lethality and semi-lethality among functionally related mutants of Drosophila melanfgaster.

Authors:  J C Lucchesi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Population genetics history: a personal view.

Authors:  J F Crow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 8.  Epistasis--the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems.

Authors:  Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 9.  Sex chromosomes and speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  High-resolution genome-wide dissection of the two rules of speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  John P Masly; Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  9 in total

1.  Neighboring genes for DNA-binding proteins rescue male sterility in Drosophila hybrids.

Authors:  Marjorie A Liénard; Luciana O Araripe; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The genetics of sex chromosomes: evolution and implications for hybrid incompatibility.

Authors:  Norman A Johnson; Joseph Lachance
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Sexual conflict through mother's curse and father's curse.

Authors:  J Arvid Ågren; Manisha Munasinghe; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Clusters of incompatible genotypes evolve with limited dispersal.

Authors:  Erin L Landguth; Norman A Johnson; Samuel A Cushman
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Pleiotropic effects of a mitochondrial-nuclear incompatibility depend upon the accelerating effect of temperature in Drosophila.

Authors:  Luke A Hoekstra; Mohammad A Siddiq; Kristi L Montooth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic background and GxE interactions modulate the penetrance of a naturally occurring wing mutation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Joseph Lachance; Lawrence Jung; John R True
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Widespread genomic incompatibilities in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  L Basten Snoek; Helen E Orbidans; Jana J Stastna; Aafke Aartse; Miriam Rodriguez; Joost A G Riksen; Jan E Kammenga; Simon C Harvey
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Spatially Heterogeneous Environmental Selection Strengthens Evolution of Reproductively Isolated Populations in a Dobzhansky-Muller System of Hybrid Incompatibility.

Authors:  Samuel A Cushman; Erin L Landguth
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Epistatic interactions between sex chromosomes and autosomes can affect the stability of sex determination systems.

Authors:  Martijn A Schenkel; Leo W Beukeboom; Ido Pen
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.516

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.