Literature DB >> 21898767

Organ quality and quality of life after liver transplantation.

Michael L Volk1, Michael Hagan.   

Abstract

Not only is there a limited supply of organs for liver transplantation, but the quality of the available organs is not uniform. Risk factors such as donor age and cause of death are known to predict graft failure, but their impact on the recipient's quality of life (QOL) has not been reported. We sent a QOL survey to 299 adults at our institution who had received a liver transplant 1 to 7 years before the study. For the 171 patients (57%) who completed the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36), the mean Physical Composite Score (PCS) and the mean Mental Composite Score (MCS) were 61 and 66, respectively; the highest scores were for the Social Functioning subscale, and the lowest scores were for the Role Functioning/Physical and Energy/Fatigue subscales. The mean donor risk index (DRI) of the organs that the subjects received was 1.4 (range = 0.8-2.4). There was no correlation between the SF-36 scores and the DRI [there were changes of -4.8 and -2.8 in the PCS and MCS per unit increase in the DRI (P = 0.4 and 0.6, respectively)], even though we controlled for potential confounders such as age, sex, hospitalization before transplantation, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score at transplantation, years since transplantation, previous transplantation, and the Charlson comorbidity index. In conclusion, we found no association between organ quality and QOL after liver transplantation. If this finding is confirmed in prospective, multicenter studies, it will be useful in counseling patients about the decision to accept or not accept high-risk organ offers.
Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21898767      PMCID: PMC3285097          DOI: 10.1002/lt.22425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  13 in total

1.  An empirical comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D in liver transplant patients.

Authors:  Louise Longworth; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  The survival benefit of deceased donor liver transplantation as a function of candidate disease severity and donor quality.

Authors:  D E Schaubel; C S Sima; N P Goodrich; S Feng; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Deaths: final data for 2005.

Authors:  Hsiang-Ching Kung; Donna L Hoyert; Jiaquan Xu; Sherry L Murphy
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2008-04-24

5.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Assessing health-related quality of life pre- and post-liver transplantation: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Julie Ratcliffe; Louise Longworth; Tracey Young; Stirling Bryan; Andrew Burroughs; Martin Buxton
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.799

7.  Determining minimally important changes in generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M Kosinski; S Z Zhao; S Dedhiya; J T Osterhaus; J E Ware
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2000-07

8.  Variation in organ quality between liver transplant centers.

Authors:  M L Volk; H A Reichert; A S F Lok; R A Hayward
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Health-related quality of life following liver transplantation.

Authors:  S Bryan; J Ratcliffe; J M Neuberger; A K Burroughs; B K Gunson; M J Buxton
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index.

Authors:  S Feng; N P Goodrich; J L Bragg-Gresham; D M Dykstra; J D Punch; M A DebRoy; S M Greenstein; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.086

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life, risk assessment, and safety research in liver transplantation: new frontiers in health services and outcomes research.

Authors:  Zeeshan Butt; Neehar D Parikh; Anton I Skaro; Daniela Ladner; David Cella
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.640

2.  Clinical Practice Guidelines for Liver Transplantation in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Faisal A Abaalkhail; Mohammed I Al Sebayel; Mohammed A Shagrani; Wael A O'Hali; Nasser M Almasri; Abduljaleel A Alalwan; Mohammed Y Alghamdi; Hamad Al-Bahili; Mohammed S AlQahtani; Saleh I Alabbad; Waleed K Al-Hamoudi; Saleh A Alqahtani
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.422

Review 3.  Quality of life after liver transplantation: State of the art.

Authors:  Louis Onghena; Wouter Develtere; Carine Poppe; Anja Geerts; Roberto Troisi; Aude Vanlander; Frederik Berrevoet; Xavier Rogiers; Hans Van Vlierberghe; Xavier Verhelst
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-06-28

4.  Clinical outcomes and quality of life in recipients of livers donated after cardiac death.

Authors:  Neehar D Parikh; Anton I Skaro; Daniela P Ladner; Vadim Lyuksemburg; Joshua G Cahan; Amna Daud; Zeeshan Butt
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.260

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.