Literature DB >> 21466651

Variation in organ quality between liver transplant centers.

M L Volk1, H A Reichert, A S F Lok, R A Hayward.   

Abstract

A wide spectrum of quality exists among deceased donor organs available for liver transplantation. It is unknown whether some transplant centers systematically use more low quality organs, and what factors might influence these decisions. We used hierarchical regression to measure variation in donor risk index (DRI) in the United States by region, organ procurement organization (OPO) and transplant center. The sample included all adults who underwent deceased donor liver transplantation between January 12, 2005 and February 1, 2009 (n = 23,810). Despite adjusting for the geographic region and OPO, transplant centers' mean DRI ranged from 1.27 to 1.74, and could not be explained by differences in patient populations such as disease severity. Larger volume centers and those having competing centers within their OPO were more likely to use higher risk organs, particularly among recipients with lower model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores. Centers using higher risk organs had equivalent waiting list mortality rates, but tended to have higher post-transplant mortality (hazard ratio 1.10 per 0.1 increase in mean DRI). In conclusion, the quality of deceased donor organ patients receive is variable and depends in part on the characteristics of the transplant center they visit. ©2011 The Authors Journal compilation©2011 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21466651      PMCID: PMC3175797          DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03487.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  19 in total

1.  Geographic differences in access to transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Mary D Ellison; Leah B Edwards; Erick B Edwards; Clyde F Barker
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Transplant data: sources, collection and research considerations, 2004.

Authors:  David M Dickinson; Dawn M Dykstra; Gregory N Levine; Shiqian Li; James C Welch; Randall L Webb
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Regional variations in peer reviewed liver allocation under the MELD system.

Authors:  Hector Rodriguez-Luna; Hugo E Vargas; Adyr Moss; Kunam S Reddy; Richard B Freeman; David Mulligan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Geographic variation in organ availability is responsible for disparities in liver transplantation between Hispanics and Caucasians.

Authors:  M L Volk; H Choi; G J W Warren; C J Sonnenday; J A Marrero; M Heisler
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Small area variations in health care delivery.

Authors:  J Wennberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model.

Authors:  D O Stram; J W Lee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The unreliability of individual physician "report cards" for assessing the costs and quality of care of a chronic disease.

Authors:  T P Hofer; R A Hayward; S Greenfield; E H Wagner; S H Kaplan; W G Manning
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index.

Authors:  S Feng; N P Goodrich; J L Bragg-Gresham; D M Dykstra; J D Punch; M A DebRoy; S M Greenstein; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Estimating the number of potential organ donors in the United States.

Authors:  Ellen Sheehy; Suzanne L Conrad; Lori E Brigham; Richard Luskin; Phyllis Weber; Mark Eakin; Lawrence Schkade; Lawrence Hunsicker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The economic impact of the utilization of liver allografts with high donor risk index.

Authors:  D A Axelrod; M Schnitzler; P R Salvalaggio; J Swindle; M M Abecassis
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.086

View more
  20 in total

1.  Center differences in model for end-stage liver disease exceptions: fairness, local culture, and norms of practice.

Authors:  Michael L Volk
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 2.  Development of organ-specific donor risk indices.

Authors:  Sanjeev K Akkina; Sumeet K Asrani; Yi Peng; Peter Stock; W Ray Kim; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Futility and rationing in liver retransplantation: when and how can we say no?

Authors:  Scott W Biggins
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 25.083

4.  Tool to Aid Patients in Selecting a Liver Transplant Center.

Authors:  Cory R Schaffhausen; Marilyn J Bruin; Sauman Chu; Helen Fu; Warren T McKinney; David Schladt; Jon J Snyder; W Ray Kim; Jack R Lake; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.799

5.  Outcomes among older adult liver transplantation recipients in the model of end stage liver disease (MELD) era.

Authors:  Maricar F Malinis; Shu Chen; Heather G Allore; Vincent J Quagliarello
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 1.530

6.  Liver transplant center variability in accepting organ offers and its impact on patient survival.

Authors:  David S Goldberg; Benjamin French; James D Lewis; Frank I Scott; Ronac Mamtani; Richard Gilroy; Scott D Halpern; Peter L Abt
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  Donor factors similarly impact survival outcome after liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma and non-hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Reena J Salgia; Nathan P Goodrich; Jorge A Marrero; Michael L Volk
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Decision support for organ offers in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Michael L Volk; Nathan Goodrich; Jennifer C Lai; Christopher Sonnenday; Kerby Shedden
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Projected future increase in aging hepatitis C virus-infected liver transplant candidates: a potential effect of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Scott W Biggins; Kiran M Bambha; Norah A Terrault; John Inadomi; Stephen Shiboski; Jennifer L Dodge; Jane Gralla; Hugo R Rosen; John P Roberts
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Center competition and outcomes following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Halldorson; Harry J Paarsch; Jennifer L Dodge; Alberto M Segre; Jennifer Lai; John Paul Roberts
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.