Literature DB >> 21898196

Effects of fixed appliances in correcting Angle Class II on the depth of the posterior airway space: FMA vs. Herbst appliance--a retrospective cephalometric study.

Gero Kinzinger1, Kathrin Czapka, Björn Ludwig, Bettina Glasl, Ulrich Gross, Jörg Lisson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective study based on the metric evaluation of lateral cephalograms was to investigate the extent to which treatment with two different fixed appliances for the correction of Angle Class II influenced the morphology of the extrathoracic airway space (the posterior airway space, PAS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 43 patients with Angle Class II malocclusion were classified into two groups according to the appliance used for treatment: the functional mandibular advancer (FMA; n = 18) or the Herbst appliance (n = 25). Lateral cephalograms were taken of each patient at the start of functional jaw orthopedic treatment (time point T1) and at its completion (time point T2). Specific distances and angles were measured and analyzed in a cephalometric analysis.
RESULTS: We observed major differences among the 43 patients in the depth of the posterior airway space during treatment with fixed appliances for Angle Class II correction. Regression analysis revealed that changes in sagittal and vertical positions had different effects on the depth of specific PAS sections: increases in anterior facial height are associated proportionately with increases in PAS width, particularly in the upper region. On the other hand, increases in posterior facial height and in the mandible's forward displacement correlated inversely to the decreases in depth, particularly in the central and lower PAS regions. The two treatment appliances (FMA, Herbst appliance) had the same effects on extrathoracic airway depth.
CONCLUSIONS: Analyses of lateral cephalograms indicate that Angle Class II treatment with fixed appliances does not prevent sleep apnea in patients at risk. Nevertheless, this study does not permit absolutely reliable conclusions about the dimensions of the pharyngeal airway space. As the lateral cephalogram provides good images of structures in the midsagittal plane but is incapable of imaging the transverse dimension, there is an automatic lack of information concerning the precise width and volume of the extrathoracic airway space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21898196     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-011-0035-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  18 in total

1.  Influence of mandibular protruding device on airway passages and dentofacial characteristics in obstructive sleep apnea and snoring.

Authors:  Anette M C Fransson; Ake Tegelberg; Björn A H Svenson; Bertil Lennartsson; Göran Isacsson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  A cephalometric comparison of subjects with snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  J M Battagel; A Johal; B Kotecha
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A polynomial approach to craniofacial growth: description and comparison of adolescent males with normal occlusion and those with untreated Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  P H Buschang; R Tanguay; J Turkewicz; A Demirjian; L La Palme
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty.

Authors:  A Björk; V Skieller
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1972-10

5.  A thermoplastic mandibular advancement device for the management of non-apnoeic snoring: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marie E Cooke; Joanna M Battagel
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Skeletal effects in class II treatment with the functional mandibular advancer (FMA)?

Authors:  Gero Kinzinger; Peter Diedrich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Case control study in the treatment of obstructive sleep-disordered breathing with an intraoral protrusive appliance.

Authors:  Edmund C Rose; Martin Germann; Stephan Sorichter; Irmtrud E Jonas
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Class II treatment with fixed functional orthodontic appliances before and after the pubertal growth peak - a cephalometric study to evaluate differential therapeutic effects.

Authors:  Linda Frye; Peter R Diedrich; Gero S M Kinzinger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Cephalometric and computed tomographic predictors of obstructive sleep apnea severity.

Authors:  A A Lowe; J A Fleetham; S Adachi; C F Ryan
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Cephalometric analysis in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Part I: diagnostic value.

Authors:  Edmund C Rose; Richard Staats; Martin Lehner; Irmtrud E Jonas
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.938

View more
  17 in total

1.  Effects of combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment for class II and III correction on posterior airway space : Comparison of mono- and bignathic osteotomies.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Hartmut Feifel; Verena Maria Vehr; Jörg Alexander Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Effects of two different removable functional appliances on depth of the posterior airway space : A retrospective cephalometric study.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Luisa Katharina Meißner; Jörg Alexander Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Two-dimensional lateral cephalometric evaluation of varying types of Class II subgroups on posterior airway space in postadolescent girls: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ulas Oz; Kaan Orhan; Meliha Rubenduz
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Pharyngeal airway and hyoid bone position changes of skeletal anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device and activator appliances.

Authors:  Sinem İnce-Bingöl; Burçak Kaya
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Upper airway changes following single-step or stepwise advancement using the Functional Mandibular Advancer.

Authors:  Isil Aras; Aylin Pasaoglu; Sultan Olmez; Idil Unal; Aynur Aras
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Changes in airway dimensions and hyoid bone position following class II correction with forsus fatigue resistant device.

Authors:  Nehir Canigur Bavbek; Burcu Balos Tuncer; Cagri Turkoz; Cagri Ulusoy; Cumhur Tuncer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of upper airway structures in paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Romeo Patini; Mariantonietta Arrica; Enrico Di Stasio; Patrizia Gallenzi; Massimo Cordaro
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Short-term pharyngeal airway changes after mandibular advancement surgery in adult Class II-Patients--a three-dimensional retrospective study.

Authors:  Janka Kochel; Philipp Meyer-Marcotty; Franka Sickel; Helmut Lindorf; Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Effectiveness of twin-block and Mandibular Protraction Appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal airway passage dimensions in Class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandible.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar Jena; Satinder Pal Singh; Ashok Kumar Utreja
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Effects of fixed functional therapy on tongue and hyoid positions and posterior airway.

Authors:  Fulya Ozdemir; Feyza Ulkur; Didem Nalbantgil
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.