BACKGROUND: It is relatively less known whether pre-pregnancy obesity and excess gestational weight gain (GWG) are associated with caesarean delivery, pregnancy complications, preterm birth, birth and placenta weights and increased length of postnatal hospital stay. METHODS: We used a population-based cohort of 6632 women who gave birth in Brisbane, Australia, between 1981 and 1983. The independent associations of pre-pregnancy obesity, GWG and institute of medicine (IOM) categories of combined pre-pregnancy BMI and GWG with outcomes were examined using multivariable regression (for continuous outcomes) and multivariable multinomial regression (for categorical outcomes) models. RESULTS: We found women who were obese prior to pregnancy and women who gained excess weight during pregnancy were at greater risk for a pregnancy complications (OR: 2.10; 1.74, 2.54; age adjusted model), caesarean section (OR 1.29; 1.09, 1.54), higher birth weight difference (206.45 gm; 178.82, 234.08) and greater placental weight difference (41.16 gm; 33.83, 48.49) and longer length of hospital stay. We also found that mothers who gained inadequate weight or were underweight before pregnancy were at greater risk of preterm birth (2.27; 1.71, 3.00), lower risk of pregnancy complications (0.58; 0.44, 0.77) and had lower birth (-190.63;-221.05,-160.20) and placental (-37.16; -45.23,-29.09) weights. Results indicate that all associations remain consistent after adjustment for a range of potential confounding factors with the exception of the association between pre-pregnancy obesity and hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-pregnancy obesity or excessive GWG are associated with greater risk of pregnancy complications, caesarean delivery and greater birth and placenta weight. Excess GWG is associated with a longer stay in hospital after delivery, independent of pre-pregnancy BMI, pregnancy complications and caesarean delivery. In addition to pre-pregnancy obesity, it is vital that clinical practice considers excess GWG as another indicator of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
BACKGROUND: It is relatively less known whether pre-pregnancy obesity and excess gestational weight gain (GWG) are associated with caesarean delivery, pregnancy complications, preterm birth, birth and placenta weights and increased length of postnatal hospital stay. METHODS: We used a population-based cohort of 6632 women who gave birth in Brisbane, Australia, between 1981 and 1983. The independent associations of pre-pregnancy obesity, GWG and institute of medicine (IOM) categories of combined pre-pregnancy BMI and GWG with outcomes were examined using multivariable regression (for continuous outcomes) and multivariable multinomial regression (for categorical outcomes) models. RESULTS: We found women who were obese prior to pregnancy and women who gained excess weight during pregnancy were at greater risk for a pregnancy complications (OR: 2.10; 1.74, 2.54; age adjusted model), caesarean section (OR 1.29; 1.09, 1.54), higher birth weight difference (206.45 gm; 178.82, 234.08) and greater placental weight difference (41.16 gm; 33.83, 48.49) and longer length of hospital stay. We also found that mothers who gained inadequate weight or were underweight before pregnancy were at greater risk of preterm birth (2.27; 1.71, 3.00), lower risk of pregnancy complications (0.58; 0.44, 0.77) and had lower birth (-190.63;-221.05,-160.20) and placental (-37.16; -45.23,-29.09) weights. Results indicate that all associations remain consistent after adjustment for a range of potential confounding factors with the exception of the association between pre-pregnancy obesity and hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-pregnancy obesity or excessive GWG are associated with greater risk of pregnancy complications, caesarean delivery and greater birth and placenta weight. Excess GWG is associated with a longer stay in hospital after delivery, independent of pre-pregnancy BMI, pregnancy complications and caesarean delivery. In addition to pre-pregnancy obesity, it is vital that clinical practice considers excess GWG as another indicator of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Authors: Leonie K Callaway; Debbie A Lawlor; Michael O'Callaghan; Gail M Williams; Jake M Najman; H David McIntyre Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Susan Y Chu; Donald J Bachman; William M Callaghan; Evelyn P Whitlock; Patricia M Dietz; Cynthia J Berg; Maureen O'Keeffe-Rosetti; F Carol Bruce; Mark C Hornbrook Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-04-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ellen A Nohr; Michael Vaeth; Jennifer L Baker; Thorkild Ia Sørensen; Jorn Olsen; Kathleen M Rasmussen Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Mary Lou Thompson; Cande V Ananth; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Raymond S Miller; Michelle A Williams Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: M Voigt; R L Schild; M Mewitz; K T M Schneider; D Schnabel; V Hesse; S Straube Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: S P Mourtakos; K D Tambalis; D B Panagiotakos; G Antonogeorgos; C D Alexi; M Georgoulis; G Saade; L S Sidossis Journal: J Hum Nutr Diet Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 3.089
Authors: Kimberly K Vesco; Michael C Leo; Njeri Karanja; Matthew W Gillman; Cindy T McEvoy; Janet C King; Cara L Eckhardt; K Sabina Smith; Nancy Perrin; Victor J Stevens Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 5.002