BACKGROUND: The attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC) on Sept 11, 2001 (9/11) created the potential for occupational exposure to known and suspected carcinogens. We examined cancer incidence and its potential association with exposure in the first 7 years after 9/11 in firefighters with health information before 9/11 and minimal loss to follow-up. METHODS: We assessed 9853 men who were employed as firefighters on Jan 1, 1996. On and after 9/11, person-time for 8927 firefighters was classified as WTC-exposed; all person-time before 9/11, and person-time after 9/11 for 926 non-WTC-exposed firefighters, was classified as non-WTC exposed. Cancer cases were confirmed by matches with state tumour registries or through appropriate documentation. We estimated the ratio of incidence rates in WTC-exposed firefighters to non-exposed firefighters, adjusted for age, race and ethnic origin, and secular trends, with the US National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) reference population. CIs were estimated with overdispersed Poisson models. Additional analyses included corrections for potential surveillance bias and modified cohort inclusion criteria. FINDINGS: Compared with the general male population in the USA with a similar demographic mix, the standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) of the cancer incidence in WTC-exposed firefighters was 1·10 (95% CI 0·98-1·25). When compared with non-exposed firefighters, the SIR of cancer incidence in WTC-exposed firefighters was 1·19 (95% CI 0·96-1·47) corrected for possible surveillance bias and 1·32 (1·07-1·62) without correction for surveillance bias. Secondary analyses showed similar effect sizes. INTERPRETATION: We reported a modest excess of cancer cases in the WTC-exposed cohort. We remain cautious in our interpretation of this finding because the time since 9/11 is short for cancer outcomes, and the reported excess of cancers is not limited to specific organ types. As in any observational study, we cannot rule out the possibility that effects in the exposed group might be due to unidentified confounders. Continued follow-up will be important and should include cancer screening and prevention strategies. FUNDING: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
BACKGROUND: The attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC) on Sept 11, 2001 (9/11) created the potential for occupational exposure to known and suspected carcinogens. We examined cancer incidence and its potential association with exposure in the first 7 years after 9/11 in firefighters with health information before 9/11 and minimal loss to follow-up. METHODS: We assessed 9853 men who were employed as firefighters on Jan 1, 1996. On and after 9/11, person-time for 8927 firefighters was classified as WTC-exposed; all person-time before 9/11, and person-time after 9/11 for 926 non-WTC-exposed firefighters, was classified as non-WTC exposed. Cancer cases were confirmed by matches with state tumour registries or through appropriate documentation. We estimated the ratio of incidence rates in WTC-exposed firefighters to non-exposed firefighters, adjusted for age, race and ethnic origin, and secular trends, with the US National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) reference population. CIs were estimated with overdispersed Poisson models. Additional analyses included corrections for potential surveillance bias and modified cohort inclusion criteria. FINDINGS: Compared with the general male population in the USA with a similar demographic mix, the standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) of the cancer incidence in WTC-exposed firefighters was 1·10 (95% CI 0·98-1·25). When compared with non-exposed firefighters, the SIR of cancer incidence in WTC-exposed firefighters was 1·19 (95% CI 0·96-1·47) corrected for possible surveillance bias and 1·32 (1·07-1·62) without correction for surveillance bias. Secondary analyses showed similar effect sizes. INTERPRETATION: We reported a modest excess of cancer cases in the WTC-exposed cohort. We remain cautious in our interpretation of this finding because the time since 9/11 is short for cancer outcomes, and the reported excess of cancers is not limited to specific organ types. As in any observational study, we cannot rule out the possibility that effects in the exposed group might be due to unidentified confounders. Continued follow-up will be important and should include cancer screening and prevention strategies. FUNDING: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
Authors: Michael D Weiden; Natalia Ferrier; Anna Nolan; William N Rom; Ashley Comfort; Jackson Gustave; Rachel Zeig-Owens; Shugi Zheng; Roberta M Goldring; Kenneth I Berger; Kaitlyn Cosenza; Roy Lee; Mayris P Webber; Kerry J Kelly; Thomas K Aldrich; David J Prezant Journal: Chest Date: 2009-10-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Anil K Chaturvedi; Neil E Caporaso; Hormuzd A Katki; Hui-Lee Wong; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Sharon R Pine; Stephen J Chanock; James J Goedert; Eric A Engels Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mayris P Webber; Jackson Gustave; Roy Lee; Justin K Niles; Kerry Kelly; Hillel W Cohen; David J Prezant Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2009-02-11 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Jacqueline M Moline; Robin Herbert; Laura Crowley; Kevin Troy; Erica Hodgman; Gauri Shukla; Iris Udasin; Benjamin Luft; Sylvan Wallenstein; Philip Landrigan; David A Savitz Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Philip J Landrigan; Paul J Lioy; George Thurston; Gertrud Berkowitz; L C Chen; Steven N Chillrud; Stephen H Gavett; Panos G Georgopoulos; Alison S Geyh; Stephen Levin; Frederica Perera; Stephen M Rappaport; Christopher Small Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Lorna E Thorpe; Shervin Assari; Stephen Deppen; Sherry Glied; Nicole Lurie; Matthew P Mauer; Vickie M Mays; Edward Trapido Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: William Moir; Rachel Zeig-Owens; Robert D Daniels; Charles B Hall; Mayris P Webber; Nadia Jaber; James H Yiin; Theresa Schwartz; Xiaoxue Liu; Madeline Vossbrinck; Kerry Kelly; David J Prezant Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Jonathan E Leeman; Sean M McBride; Daniel Spielsinger; Eric J Sherman; Richard Wong; Nadeem Riaz; Nancy Y Lee; Chiaojung Jillian Tsai Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2018-02-10 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Dana Hashim; Paolo Boffetta; Matthew Galsky; William Oh; Roberto Lucchini; Michael Crane; Benjamin Luft; Jaqueline Moline; Iris Udasin; Denise Harrison; Emanuela Taioli Journal: Eur J Cancer Prev Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Cheryl R Stein; Sylvan Wallenstein; Moshe Shapiro; Dana Hashim; Jacqueline M Moline; Iris Udasin; Michael A Crane; Benjamin J Luft; Roberto G Lucchini; William L Holden Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Michael D Weiden; Sophia Kwon; Erin Caraher; Kenneth I Berger; Joan Reibman; William N Rom; David J Prezant; Anna Nolan Journal: Semin Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 3.119
Authors: Rachel Zeig-Owens; Andrea Kablanian; Mayris P Webber; Yang Liu; Edward Mayerson; Theresa Schwartz; Nadia Jaber; Kerry J Kelly; David J Prezant Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2016 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.792