Literature DB >> 21889595

Conflict caused by visual feedback modulates activation in somatosensory areas during movement execution.

Toshiaki Wasaka1, Ryusuke Kakigi.   

Abstract

The role of sensory information in motor control has been studied, but the cortical processing underlying cross-modal relationship between visual and somatosensory information for movement execution remains a matter of debate. Visual estimates of limb positions are congruent with proprioceptive estimates under normal visual conditions, but a mismatch between the watched and felt movement of the hand disrupts motor execution. We investigated whether activation in somatosensory areas was affected by the discordance between the intended and an executed action. Subjects performed self-paced thumb movement of the left hand under normal visual and mirror conditions. The Mirror condition provided a non-veridical and unexpected visual feedback. The results showed activity in the primary somatosensory area to be inhibited and activity in the secondary somatosensory area (SII) to be enhanced with voluntary movement, and neural responses in the SII and parietal cortex were strongly affected by the unexpected visual feedback. These results provide evidence that the visual information plays a crucial role in activation in somatosensory areas during motor execution. A mechanism that monitors sensory inputs and motor outputs congruent with current intension is necessary to control voluntary movement.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21889595     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  13 in total

1.  Modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials during force generation and relaxation.

Authors:  Toshiaki Wasaka; Tetsuo Kida; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  What you feel is what you see: inverse dynamics estimation underlies the resistive sensation of a delayed cursor.

Authors:  Shinya Takamuku; Hiroaki Gomi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The influence of embodiment on multisensory integration using the mirror box illusion.

Authors:  Jared Medina; Priya Khurana; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2015-08-28

Review 4.  Imaging and clinical evidence of sensorimotor problems in CRPS: utilizing novel treatment approaches.

Authors:  Jacqueline Bailey; Sara Nelson; Jenny Lewis; Candida S McCabe
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Sensorimotor incongruence and body perception: an experimental investigation.

Authors:  Jens Foell; Robin Bekrater-Bodmann; Candida S McCabe; Herta Flor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Delayed mirror visual feedback presented using a novel mirror therapy system enhances cortical activation in healthy adults.

Authors:  Hsin-Min Lee; Ping-Chia Li; Shih-Chen Fan
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability.

Authors:  Mathew Yarossi; Thushini Manuweera; Sergei V Adamovich; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The effect of unpredicted visual feedback on activation in the secondary somatosensory cortex during movement execution.

Authors:  Toshiaki Wasaka; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  MEG reveals a fast pathway from somatosensory cortex to occipital areas via posterior parietal cortex in a blind subject.

Authors:  Andreas A Ioannides; Lichan Liu; Vahe Poghosyan; George A Saridis; Albert Gjedde; Maurice Ptito; Ron Kupers
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Reappraisal of field dynamics of motor cortex during self-paced finger movements.

Authors:  Masataka Suzuki; Toshiaki Wasaka; Koji Inui; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.