Jill Cox1. 1. Jill Cox is an advanced practice nurse and a wound, ostomy, continence nurse at Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, Englewood, New Jersey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers are one of the most underrated conditions in critically ill patients. Despite the introduction of clinical practice guidelines and advances in medical technology, the prevalence of pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients continues to escalate. Currently, consensus is lacking on the most important risk factors for pressure ulcers in critically ill patients, and no risk assessment scale exclusively for pressure ulcers in these patients is available. OBJECTIVE: To determine which risk factors are most predictive of pressure ulcers in adult critical care patients. Risk factors investigated included total score on the Braden Scale, mobility, activity, sensory perception, moisture, friction/shear, nutrition, age, blood pressure, length of stay in the intensive care unit, score on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, vasopressor administration, and comorbid conditions. METHODS: A retrospective, correlational design was used to examine 347 patients admitted to a medical-surgical intensive care unit from October 2008 through May 2009. RESULTS: According to direct logistic regression analyses, age, length of stay, mobility, friction/shear, norepinephrine infusion, and cardiovascular disease explained a major part of the variance in pressure ulcers. CONCLUSION: Current risk assessment scales for development of pressure ulcers may not include risk factors common in critically ill adults. Development of a risk assessment model for pressure ulcers in these patients is warranted and could be the foundation for development of a risk assessment tool.
BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers are one of the most underrated conditions in critically ill patients. Despite the introduction of clinical practice guidelines and advances in medical technology, the prevalence of pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients continues to escalate. Currently, consensus is lacking on the most important risk factors for pressure ulcers in critically ill patients, and no risk assessment scale exclusively for pressure ulcers in these patients is available. OBJECTIVE: To determine which risk factors are most predictive of pressure ulcers in adult critical care patients. Risk factors investigated included total score on the Braden Scale, mobility, activity, sensory perception, moisture, friction/shear, nutrition, age, blood pressure, length of stay in the intensive care unit, score on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, vasopressor administration, and comorbid conditions. METHODS: A retrospective, correlational design was used to examine 347 patients admitted to a medical-surgical intensive care unit from October 2008 through May 2009. RESULTS: According to direct logistic regression analyses, age, length of stay, mobility, friction/shear, norepinephrine infusion, and cardiovascular disease explained a major part of the variance in pressure ulcers. CONCLUSION: Current risk assessment scales for development of pressure ulcers may not include risk factors common in critically ill adults. Development of a risk assessment model for pressure ulcers in these patients is warranted and could be the foundation for development of a risk assessment tool.
Authors: Sookyung Hyun; Xiaobai Li; Brenda Vermillion; Cheryl Newton; Monica Fall; Pacharmon Kaewprag; Susan Moffatt-Bruce; Elizabeth R Lenz Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Marie Boltz; Elizabeth Capezuti; Joseph Shuluk; Julianna Brouwer; Deirdre Carolan; Shirley Conway; Sue DeRosa; Rita LaReau; Denise Lyons; Sue Nickoley; Tyleen Smith; James E Galvin Journal: Nurs Health Sci Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 1.857
Authors: Angela Kane; Robyn Warwaruk-Rogers; Chester Ho; Ming Chan; Richard Stein; Vivian K Mushahwar; Sean P Dukelow Journal: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Raphaele Girard; Loredana Baboi; Louis Ayzac; Jean-Christophe Richard; Claude Guérin Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Mary Jo Grap; Cindy L Munro; Paul A Wetzel; Christine M Schubert; Anathea Pepperl; Ruth S Burk; Valentina Lucas Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 2.228