Literature DB >> 27134239

Backrest Elevation and Tissue Interface Pressure by Anatomical Location During Mechanical Ventilation.

Mary Jo Grap1, Cindy L Munro2, Paul A Wetzel2, Christine M Schubert2, Anathea Pepperl2, Ruth S Burk2, Valentina Lucas2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Backrest elevations less than 30° are recommended to reduce pressure ulcers, but positions greater than 30° are recommended during mechanical ventilation to reduce risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Interface pressure may vary with level of backrest elevation and anatomical location (eg, sacrum, heels).
OBJECTIVE: To describe backrest elevation and anatomical location and intensity of skin pressure across the body in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.
METHODS: In a longitudinal study, patients from 3 adult intensive care units in a single institution receiving mechanical ventilation were enrolled within 24 hours of intubation from February 2010 through May 2012. Backrest elevation (by inclinometer) and pressure (by a pressure-mapping system) were measured continuously for 72 hours. Mean tissue interface pressure was determined for 7 anatomical areas: left and right scapula, left and right trochanter, sacrum, and left and right heel.
RESULTS: Data on 133 patients were analyzed. For each 1° increase in backrest elevation, mean interface pressure decreased 0.09 to 0.42 mm Hg. For each unit increase in body mass index, mean trochanter pressure increased 0.22 to 0.24 mm Hg. Knee angle (lower extremity bent at the knee) and mobility were time-varying covariates in models of the relationship between backrest elevation and tissue interface pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: Individual factors such as patient movement and body mass index may be important elements related to risk for pressure ulcers and ventilator-associated pneumonia, and a more nuanced approach in which positioning decisions are tailored to optimize outcomes for individual patients appears warranted. ©2016 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27134239      PMCID: PMC5539907          DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2016317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  24 in total

1.  Body mass index and pressure ulcers: improved predictability of pressure ulcers in intensive care patients.

Authors:  Sookyung Hyun; Xiaobai Li; Brenda Vermillion; Cheryl Newton; Monica Fall; Pacharmon Kaewprag; Susan Moffatt-Bruce; Elizabeth R Lenz
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Roadmap for safety: National Quality Forum officially releases 30 safe practices for better healthcare.

Authors: 
Journal:  Qual Lett Healthc Lead       Date:  2003-07

3.  Actigraphy: analyzing patient movement.

Authors:  Mary Jo Grap; Virginia A Hamilton; Ann McNallen; Jessica M Ketchum; Al M Best; Nyimas Y Isti Arief; Paul A Wetzel
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 2.210

4.  The association of BMI and Braden total score on the occurrence of pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Daniel J Drake; Melvin Swanson; Gloria Baker; Marie Pokorny; Mary Ann Rose; Laurie Clark-Reed; Wanda Waters; Frank R Watkins; Martha Keehner Engelke
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.741

Review 5.  Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system.

Authors:  Eyal Zimlichman; Daniel Henderson; Orly Tamir; Calvin Franz; Peter Song; Cyrus K Yamin; Carol Keohane; Charles R Denham; David W Bates
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013 Dec 9-23       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Predictors of pressure ulcers in adult critical care patients.

Authors:  Jill Cox
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Predictive power of the Braden scale for pressure sore risk in adult critical care patients: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Jill Cox
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.741

8.  Continuous measurement of backrest elevation in critical care: a research strategy.

Authors:  R Hummel; M J Grap; C N Sessler; C L Munro; M Corley
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; J E Zimmerman; D P Wagner; E A Draper; D E Lawrence
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Guidelines for preventing health-care--associated pneumonia, 2003: recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors:  Ofelia C Tablan; Larry J Anderson; Richard Besser; Carolyn Bridges; Rana Hajjeh
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2004-03-26
View more
  4 in total

1.  High frequency ultrasound sacral images in the critically ill: Tissue characteristics versus visual evaluation.

Authors:  Mary Jo Grap; Christine M Schubert; Ruth S Burk; Valentina Lucas; Paul A Wetzel; Anathea Pepperl; Cindy L Munro
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.072

2.  High-Frequency Ultrasound: Obtaining Optimal Images and the Effect of Image Artifacts on Image Quality.

Authors:  Ruth S Burk; Mary Jo Grap; Valentina Lucas; Cindy L Munro; Paul A Wetzel; Christine M Schubert
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Tissue interface pressure and skin integrity in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Mary Jo Grap; Cindy L Munro; Paul A Wetzel; Christine M Schubert; Anathea Pepperl; Ruth S Burk; Valentina Lucas
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.072

4.  Implementation of Pressure Injury Prevention Strategies in Acute Care: Results From the 2018-2019 International Pressure Injury Prevalence Survey.

Authors:  Laura E Edsberg; Jill Cox; Kimberly Koloms; Catherine A VanGilder-Freese
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2022 May-Jun 01       Impact factor: 1.970

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.