BACKGROUND: Noninvasive imaging of atherosclerosis is being increasingly used in clinical practice, with some experts recommending to screen all healthy adults for atherosclerosis and some jurisdictions mandating insurance coverage for atherosclerosis screening. Data on the impact of such screening have not been systematically synthesized. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess whether atherosclerosis screening improves cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and clinical outcomes. DESIGN: This study is a systematic review. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Clinical Trial Register without language restrictions. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included studies examining the impact of atherosclerosis screening with noninvasive imaging (e.g., carotid ultrasound, coronary calcification) on CVRF, cardiovascular events, or mortality in adults without cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: We identified four randomized controlled trials (RCT, n=709) and eight non-randomized studies comparing participants with evidence of atherosclerosis on screening to those without (n=2,994). In RCTs, atherosclerosis screening did not improve CVRF, but smoking cessation rates increased (18% vs. 6%, p=0.03) in one RCT. Non-randomized studies found improvements in several intermediate outcomes, such as increased motivation to change lifestyle and increased perception of cardiovascular risk. However, such data were conflicting and limited by the lack of a randomized control group. No studies examined the impact of screening on cardiovascular events or mortality. Heterogeneity in screening methods and studied outcomes did not permit pooling of results. CONCLUSION: Available evidence about atherosclerosis screening is limited, with mixed results on CVRF control, increased smoking cessation in one RCT, and no data on cardiovascular events. Such screening should be validated by large clinical trials before widespread use.
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive imaging of atherosclerosis is being increasingly used in clinical practice, with some experts recommending to screen all healthy adults for atherosclerosis and some jurisdictions mandating insurance coverage for atherosclerosis screening. Data on the impact of such screening have not been systematically synthesized. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess whether atherosclerosis screening improves cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and clinical outcomes. DESIGN: This study is a systematic review. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Clinical Trial Register without language restrictions. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included studies examining the impact of atherosclerosis screening with noninvasive imaging (e.g., carotid ultrasound, coronary calcification) on CVRF, cardiovascular events, or mortality in adults without cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: We identified four randomized controlled trials (RCT, n=709) and eight non-randomized studies comparing participants with evidence of atherosclerosis on screening to those without (n=2,994). In RCTs, atherosclerosis screening did not improve CVRF, but smoking cessation rates increased (18% vs. 6%, p=0.03) in one RCT. Non-randomized studies found improvements in several intermediate outcomes, such as increased motivation to change lifestyle and increased perception of cardiovascular risk. However, such data were conflicting and limited by the lack of a randomized control group. No studies examined the impact of screening on cardiovascular events or mortality. Heterogeneity in screening methods and studied outcomes did not permit pooling of results. CONCLUSION: Available evidence about atherosclerosis screening is limited, with mixed results on CVRF control, increased smoking cessation in one RCT, and no data on cardiovascular events. Such screening should be validated by large clinical trials before widespread use.
Authors: Pasquale Perrone-Filardi; Stephan Achenbach; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Zeljko Reiner; Gianmario Sambuceti; Joanne D Schuijf; Ernst Van der Wall; Philip A Kaufmann; Juhani Knuuti; Stephen Schroeder; Michael J Zellweger Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-07-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Pamela S Douglas; Bijoy Khandheria; Raymond F Stainback; Neil J Weissman; Eric D Peterson; Robert C Hendel; Raymond F Stainback; Michael Blaivas; Roger D Des Prez; Linda D Gillam; Terry Golash; Loren F Hiratzka; William G Kussmaul; Arthur J Labovitz; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Frederick A Masoudi; Paul H Mayo; David Porembka; John A Spertus; L Samuel Wann; Susan E Wiegers; Ralph G Brindis; Pamela S Douglas; Robert C Hendel; Manesh R Patel; Eric D Peterson; Michael J Wolk; Joseph M Allen Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-03-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Raza H Orakzai; Khurram Nasir; Sarwar H Orakzai; Nove Kalia; Ambarish Gopal; Kiran Musunuru; Roger S Blumenthal; Mathew J Budoff Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2008-01-28 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Rachael A Wyman; Giorgio Gimelli; Patrick E McBride; Claudia E Korcarz; James H Stein Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2007-10-17 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Robert Detrano; Alan D Guerci; J Jeffrey Carr; Diane E Bild; Gregory Burke; Aaron R Folsom; Kiang Liu; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; David A Bluemke; Daniel H O'Leary; Russell Tracy; Karol Watson; Nathan D Wong; Richard A Kronmal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: F G R Fowkes; G D Murray; I Butcher; C L Heald; R J Lee; L E Chambless; A R Folsom; A T Hirsch; M Dramaix; G deBacker; J-C Wautrecht; M Kornitzer; A B Newman; M Cushman; K Sutton-Tyrrell; F G R Fowkes; A J Lee; J F Price; R B d'Agostino; J M Murabito; P E Norman; K Jamrozik; J D Curb; K H Masaki; B L Rodríguez; J M Dekker; L M Bouter; R J Heine; G Nijpels; C D A Stehouwer; L Ferrucci; M M McDermott; H E Stoffers; J D Hooi; J A Knottnerus; M Ogren; B Hedblad; J C Witteman; M M B Breteler; M G M Hunink; A Hofman; M H Criqui; R D Langer; A Fronek; W R Hiatt; R Hamman; H E Resnick; J Guralnik; M M McDermott Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-07-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Nicolas Rodondi; Reto Auer; Patrick J Devine; Patrick G O'Malley; Daniel Hayoz; Jacques Cornuz Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Nancy A Obuchowski; Darlene Holden; Michael T Modic; Grace Cheah; Alex Zhenghong Fu; Michael Brant-Zawadzki; Raul Seballos; Tan-Lucien Mohammed Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Joshua R Lewis; Mandy Stanley; Reindolf Anokye; Ben Jackson; James Dimmock; Joanne M Dickson; Lauren C Blekkenhorst; Jonathan M Hodgson Journal: F1000Res Date: 2020-11-26