Literature DB >> 17652467

The relationship between study processing and the effects of cue congruency at retrieval: fMRI support for transfer appropriate processing.

Heekyeong Park1, Michael D Rugg.   

Abstract

Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, the present study investigated whether the enhanced memory performance associated with congruent relative to incongruent retrieval cues is modulated by how items are encoded. Subjects studied a list of visually presented words and pictures and attempted to recognize these items in a later memory test. Half of the studied items were tested with a congruent cue (word-word and picture-picture), whereas the remainders were tested with an incongruent cue (word-picture and picture-word). For both words and pictures, regions where study activity was greater for congruently than incongruently cued items overlapped regions where activity differentiated the 2 classes of study material. Thus, word congruency effects overlapped regions where activity elicited by study words exceeded the activity elicited by pictures. Similarly, picture congruency effects overlapped regions demonstrating enhanced activity for pictures relative to words. In addition, several regions, including dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and intraparietal sulcus, demonstrated material-nonspecific congruency effects. The findings suggest that items benefit from a congruent retrieval cue when their study processing resembles the processing later engaged by the retrieval cue. Consistent with the principle of transfer appropriate processing, the benefit of a congruent retrieval cue derives from the interaction between study and retrieval processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17652467     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  10 in total

1.  Effects of study task on the neural correlates of source encoding.

Authors:  Heekyeong Park; Melina R Uncapher; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Dissociable effects of top-down and bottom-up attention during episodic encoding.

Authors:  Melina R Uncapher; J Benjamin Hutchinson; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Brain mechanisms of successful recognition through retrieval of semantic context.

Authors:  Kristin E Flegal; Alejandro Marín-Gutiérrez; J Daniel Ragland; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Neural correlates of successful encoding of semantically and phonologically mediated inter-item associations.

Authors:  Heekyeong Park; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals neuroanatomical dissociations during semantic integration in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; W Caroline West; Balaji M Lakshmanan; Don Goff
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Memory Reactivation Predicts Resistance to Retroactive Interference: Evidence from Multivariate Classification and Pattern Similarity Analyses.

Authors:  Joshua D Koen; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Suppressing unwanted memories reduces their unconscious influence via targeted cortical inhibition.

Authors:  Pierre Gagnepain; Richard N Henson; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Visual and Semantic Representations Predict Subsequent Memory in Perceptual and Conceptual Memory Tests.

Authors:  Simon W Davis; Benjamin R Geib; Erik A Wing; Wei-Chun Wang; Mariam Hovhannisyan; Zachary A Monge; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Neuroelectric evidence for cognitive association formation: an event-related potential investigation.

Authors:  Alice S N Kim; Malcolm A Binns; Claude Alain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The time course of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in memory formation.

Authors:  Maro G Machizawa; Roger Kalla; Vincent Walsh; Leun J Otten
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.