Literature DB >> 21878608

Perception and motivation in face recognition: a critical review of theories of the Cross-Race Effect.

Steven G Young1, Kurt Hugenberg, Michael J Bernstein, Donald F Sacco.   

Abstract

Although humans possess well-developed face processing expertise, face processing is nevertheless subject to a variety of biases. Perhaps the best known of these biases is the Cross-Race Effect--the tendency to have more accurate recognition for same-race than cross-race faces. The current work reviews the evidence for and provides a critical review of theories of the Cross-Race Effect, including perceptual expertise and social cognitive accounts of the bias. The authors conclude that recent hybrid models of the Cross-Race Effect, which combine elements of both perceptual expertise and social cognitive frameworks, provide an opportunity for theoretical synthesis and advancement not afforded by independent expertise or social cognitive models. Finally, the authors suggest future research directions intended to further develop a comprehensive and integrative understanding of biases in face recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21878608     DOI: 10.1177/1088868311418987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev        ISSN: 1532-7957


  31 in total

1.  Why eyewitnesses fail.

Authors:  Thomas D Albright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Putting a face in its place: in- and out-group membership alters the N170 response.

Authors:  Xin Zheng; Sidney J Segalowitz
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Same faces, different labels: generating the cross-race effect in face memory with social category information.

Authors:  Kathleen L Hourihan; Scott H Fraundorf; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-10

4.  Artificial faces are harder to remember.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Jonathan Pacella
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2015-11-01

5.  Not so fast! Response times in the computerized Benton Face Recognition Test may not reflect face recognition ability.

Authors:  Joseph DeGutis; Xian Li; Bar Yosef; Maruti V Mishra
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  Mnemonic discrimination of similar face stimuli and a potential mechanism for the "other race" effect.

Authors:  Allen Chang; Elizabeth Murray; Michael A Yassa
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Rule-based or information-integration category: processing of the self-face.

Authors:  Ronghua Zhang; Xiaofeng Ma; Aibao Zhou
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-09-13

8.  When Do We Confuse Self and Other in Action Memory? Reduced False Memories of Self-Performance after Observing Actions by an Out-Group vs. In-Group Actor.

Authors:  Isabel Lindner; Cécile Schain; René Kopietz; Gerald Echterhoff
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-02

9.  Gendered race: are infants' face preferences guided by intersectionality of sex and race?

Authors:  Hojin I Kim; Kerri L Johnson; Scott P Johnson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-03

Review 10.  A unified coding strategy for processing faces and voices.

Authors:  Galit Yovel; Pascal Belin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.