Literature DB >> 21876156

The motor origins of human and avian song structure.

Adam T Tierney1, Frank A Russo, Aniruddh D Patel.   

Abstract

Human song exhibits great structural diversity, yet certain aspects of melodic shape (how pitch is patterned over time) are widespread. These include a predominance of arch-shaped and descending melodic contours in musical phrases, a tendency for phrase-final notes to be relatively long, and a bias toward small pitch movements between adjacent notes in a melody [Huron D (2006) Sweet Anticipation: Music and the Psychology of Expectation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)]. What is the origin of these features? We hypothesize that they stem from motor constraints on song production (i.e., the energetic efficiency of their underlying motor actions) rather than being innately specified. One prediction of this hypothesis is that any animals subject to similar motor constraints on song will exhibit similar melodic shapes, no matter how distantly related those animals are to humans. Conversely, animals who do not share similar motor constraints on song will not exhibit convergent melodic shapes. Birds provide an ideal case for testing these predictions, because their peripheral mechanisms of song production have both notable similarities and differences from human vocal mechanisms [Riede T, Goller F (2010) Brain Lang 115:69-80]. We use these similarities and differences to make specific predictions about shared and distinct features of human and avian song structure and find that these predictions are confirmed by empirical analysis of diverse human and avian song samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21876156      PMCID: PMC3174665          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1103882108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  12 in total

1.  The neuromuscular control of birdsong.

Authors:  R A Suthers; F Goller; C Pytte
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Emotive transforms.

Authors:  J Sundberg
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2000 Apr-Dec       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  Songbirds tune their vocal tract to the fundamental frequency of their song.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Roderick A Suthers; Neville H Fletcher; William E Blevins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Why birdsong is sometimes like music.

Authors:  Luis F Baptista; Robin A Keister
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.416

5.  Vocal tract resonances in oscine bird sound production: evidence from birdsongs in a helium atmosphere.

Authors:  S Nowicki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Jan 1-7       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The acoustics of the singing voice.

Authors:  J Sundberg
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.142

Review 7.  Peripheral mechanisms for vocal production in birds - differences and similarities to human speech and singing.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Franz Goller
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Individual differences reveal the basis of consonance.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andriana J Lehr; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  A biological rationale for musical scales.

Authors:  Kamraan Z Gill; Dale Purves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  On pressure-frequency relations in the excised larynx.

Authors:  Fariborz Alipour; Ronald C Scherer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  18 in total

1.  Statistical universals reveal the structures and functions of human music.

Authors:  Patrick E Savage; Steven Brown; Emi Sakai; Thomas E Currie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Principles of structure building in music, language and animal song.

Authors:  Martin Rohrmeier; Willem Zuidema; Geraint A Wiggins; Constance Scharff
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Motor constraints influence cultural evolution of rhythm.

Authors:  Helena Miton; Thomas Wolf; Cordula Vesper; Günther Knoblich; Dan Sperber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Investigation of musicality in birdsong.

Authors:  David Rothenberg; Tina C Roeske; Henning U Voss; Marc Naguib; Ofer Tchernichovski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Songbirds use spectral shape, not pitch, for sound pattern recognition.

Authors:  Micah R Bregman; Aniruddh D Patel; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Brain potentials predict learning, transmission and modification of an artificial symbolic system.

Authors:  Massimo Lumaca; Giosuè Baggio
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Overtone-based pitch selection in hermit thrush song: unexpected convergence with scale construction in human music.

Authors:  Emily L Doolittle; Bruno Gingras; Dominik M Endres; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  "Il flauto magico" still works: Mozart's secret of ventilation.

Authors:  Klaus Laczika; Oliver P Graber; Gerhard Tucek; Alfred Lohninger; Nikolaus Fliri; Gertraud Berka-Schmid; Eva K Masel; Christoph C Zielinski
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2013-03-19

9.  The evolutionary biology of musical rhythm: was Darwin wrong?

Authors:  Aniruddh D Patel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Cueing musical emotions: An empirical analysis of 24-piece sets by Bach and Chopin documents parallels with emotional speech.

Authors:  Matthew Poon; Michael Schutz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.