Literature DB >> 21874190

A comprehensive overview of computational protein disorder prediction methods.

Xin Deng1, Jesse Eickholt, Jianlin Cheng.   

Abstract

Over the past decade there has been a growing acknowledgement that a large proportion of proteins within most proteomes contain disordered regions. Disordered regions are segments of the protein chain which do not adopt a stable structure. Recognition of disordered regions in a protein is of great importance for protein structure prediction, protein structure determination and function annotation as these regions have a close relationship with protein expression and functionality. As a result, a great many protein disorder prediction methods have been developed so far. Here, we present an overview of current protein disorder prediction methods including an analysis of their advantages and shortcomings. In order to help users to select alternative tools under different circumstances, we also evaluate 23 disorder predictors on the benchmark data of the most recent round of the Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction (CASP) and assess their accuracy using several complementary measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21874190      PMCID: PMC3633217          DOI: 10.1039/c1mb05207a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biosyst        ISSN: 1742-2051


  47 in total

Review 1.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm.

Authors:  P E Wright; H J Dyson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-10-22       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  NORSp: Predictions of long regions without regular secondary structure.

Authors:  Jinfeng Liu; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Assessment of disorder predictions in CASP6.

Authors:  Yumi Jin; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

4.  Intrinsic disorder prediction from the analysis of multiple protein fold recognition models.

Authors:  Liam J McGuffin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Predicting intrinsic disorder in proteins: an overview.

Authors:  Bo He; Kejun Wang; Yunlong Liu; Bin Xue; Vladimir N Uversky; A Keith Dunker
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 25.617

6.  Protein disorder prediction: implications for structural proteomics.

Authors:  Rune Linding; Lars Juhl Jensen; Francesca Diella; Peer Bork; Toby J Gibson; Robert B Russell
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life.

Authors:  J J Ward; J S Sodhi; L J McGuffin; B F Buxton; D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Improved sequence-based prediction of disordered regions with multilayer fusion of multiple information sources.

Authors:  Marcin J Mizianty; Wojciech Stach; Ke Chen; Kanaka Durga Kedarisetti; Fatemeh Miri Disfani; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  DisProt: the Database of Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Megan Sickmeier; Justin A Hamilton; Tanguy LeGall; Vladimir Vacic; Marc S Cortese; Agnes Tantos; Beata Szabo; Peter Tompa; Jake Chen; Vladimir N Uversky; Zoran Obradovic; A Keith Dunker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  PrDOS: prediction of disordered protein regions from amino acid sequence.

Authors:  Takashi Ishida; Kengo Kinoshita
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  45 in total

1.  Conformational stabilization of the membrane embedded targeting domain of the lysosomal peptide transporter TAPL for solution NMR.

Authors:  Franz Tumulka; Christian Roos; Frank Löhr; Christoph Bock; Frank Bernhard; Volker Dötsch; Rupert Abele
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 2.  Critical evaluation of bioinformatics tools for the prediction of protein crystallization propensity.

Authors:  Huilin Wang; Liubin Feng; Geoffrey I Webb; Lukasz Kurgan; Jiangning Song; Donghai Lin
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Genes encoding intrinsic disorder in Eukaryota have high GC content.

Authors:  Zhenling Peng; Vladimir N Uversky; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Intrinsically Disord Proteins       Date:  2016-12-15

Review 4.  Comprehensive review of methods for prediction of intrinsic disorder and its molecular functions.

Authors:  Fanchi Meng; Vladimir N Uversky; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Detection of disordered regions in globular proteins using ¹³C-detected NMR.

Authors:  Felicia L V Gray; Marcelo J Murai; Jolanta Grembecka; Tomasz Cierpicki
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Inherent relationships among different biophysical prediction methods for intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Fan Jin; Zhirong Liu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Principles and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics.

Authors:  Tatiana Maximova; Ryan Moffatt; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  AUCpreD: proteome-level protein disorder prediction by AUC-maximized deep convolutional neural fields.

Authors:  Sheng Wang; Jianzhu Ma; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  DISOselect: Disorder predictor selection at the protein level.

Authors:  Akila Katuwawala; Christopher J Oldfield; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Assessment of 3D models for allergen research.

Authors:  Trevor D Power; Ovidiu Ivanciuc; Catherine H Schein; Werner Braun
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.