Literature DB >> 16187359

Assessment of disorder predictions in CASP6.

Yumi Jin1, Roland L Dunbrack.   

Abstract

Natively disordered proteins or protein segments are those without stable secondary or tertiary structure in the absence of binding partners. Such disordered regions often are important functional sites in many biological processes, especially those involved in transcription, translation, and cell signaling. The prediction of such regions is therefore of great importance in focusing experimental efforts on regions of proteins that may be critical for function. In CASP6, held in 2004, twenty research groups participated in the prediction of disordered regions. Both binary predictions (ordered or disordered) and assigned scores for disorder were assessed. Several groups performed quite well in predicting regions of disorder in the X-ray and NMR structures available to the assessors. The best of these groups performed better than the best groups in CASP5, held in 2002. 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16187359     DOI: 10.1002/prot.20734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  35 in total

1.  Determination of protein regions responsible for interactions of amelogenin with CD63 and LAMP1.

Authors:  YanMing Zou; HongJun Wang; Jason L Shapiro; Curtis T Okamoto; Steven J Brookes; S Petter Lyngstadaas; Malcolm L Snead; Michael L Paine
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Between order and disorder in protein structures: analysis of "dual personality" fragments in proteins.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Boguslaw Stec; Adam Godzik
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Predicting protein flexibility through the prediction of local structures.

Authors:  Aurélie Bornot; Catherine Etchebest; Alexandre G de Brevern
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-12-06

4.  Evaluation of disorder predictions in CASP9.

Authors:  Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult; Anna Tramontano; Andriy Kryshtafovych
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-09-16

Review 5.  A comprehensive overview of computational protein disorder prediction methods.

Authors:  Xin Deng; Jesse Eickholt; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2011-08-26

6.  Parameterization of disorder predictors for large-scale applications requiring high specificity by using an extended benchmark dataset.

Authors:  Fernanda L Sirota; Hong-Sain Ooi; Tobias Gattermayer; Georg Schneider; Frank Eisenhaber; Sebastian Maurer-Stroh
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Library of disordered patterns in 3D protein structures.

Authors:  Michail Yu Lobanov; Eugeniya I Furletova; Natalya S Bogatyreva; Michail A Roytberg; Oxana V Galzitskaya
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  A critical evaluation of in silico methods for detection of membrane protein intrinsic disorder.

Authors:  Edward E Pryor; Michael C Wiener
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Predicting disordered regions in proteins using the profiles of amino acid indices.

Authors:  Pengfei Han; Xiuzhen Zhang; Zhi-Ping Feng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Protein secondary structure appears to be robust under in silico evolution while protein disorder appears not to be.

Authors:  Christian Schaefer; Avner Schlessinger; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.