OBJECTIVE: While patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices could benefit from magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, the presence of such devices has been designated as an absolute contraindication to MR. Although scanning algorithms are proposed for cardiac implantable electronic devices, their safety remains uncertain. To address this issue, the safety of serial cardiac MR scans was evaluated in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). METHODS: Three serial cardiac MR scans were prospectively performed at 1.5 T on 10 patients (9 men) of median age 56 years (range 51-68) with ICDs. ICD interrogation was performed before and after the MR scan and at a follow-up of median 370 days (range 274-723). Image quality was also assessed. RESULTS: In all patients MR scanning occurred without complications. There were no differences between pre- and post-MR pacing capture threshold, pacing lead or high voltage lead impedance, or battery voltage values. During follow-up there were no occurrences of ICD dysfunction. Although most patients had image artifacts, the studies were generally diagnostic regarding left ventricular function and wall motion. Delayed enhancement imaging was of good quality for inferior wall and inferolateral infarcts, but ICD artifacts often affected the imaging of anterior wall infarcts. CONCLUSION: Serial MR scans at 1.5 T in patients with ICDs, when carefully performed in a monitored setting, have no adverse effects on either patient or device. When required, single or multiple MR scans at 1.5 T may therefore be considered for clinical diagnostic purposes in these patients.
OBJECTIVE: While patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices could benefit from magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, the presence of such devices has been designated as an absolute contraindication to MR. Although scanning algorithms are proposed for cardiac implantable electronic devices, their safety remains uncertain. To address this issue, the safety of serial cardiac MR scans was evaluated in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). METHODS: Three serial cardiac MR scans were prospectively performed at 1.5 T on 10 patients (9 men) of median age 56 years (range 51-68) with ICDs. ICD interrogation was performed before and after the MR scan and at a follow-up of median 370 days (range 274-723). Image quality was also assessed. RESULTS: In all patients MR scanning occurred without complications. There were no differences between pre- and post-MR pacing capture threshold, pacing lead or high voltage lead impedance, or battery voltage values. During follow-up there were no occurrences of ICD dysfunction. Although most patients had image artifacts, the studies were generally diagnostic regarding left ventricular function and wall motion. Delayed enhancement imaging was of good quality for inferior wall and inferolateral infarcts, but ICD artifacts often affected the imaging of anterior wall infarcts. CONCLUSION: Serial MR scans at 1.5 T in patients with ICDs, when carefully performed in a monitored setting, have no adverse effects on either patient or device. When required, single or multiple MR scans at 1.5 T may therefore be considered for clinical diagnostic purposes in these patients.
Authors: Ariel Roguin; Menekhem M Zviman; Glenn R Meininger; E Rene Rodrigues; Timm M Dickfeld; David A Bluemke; Albert Lardo; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Henry R Halperin Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-07-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Andrew E Epstein; John P DiMarco; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Roger A Freedman; Leonard S Gettes; A Marc Gillinov; Gabriel Gregoratos; Stephen C Hammill; David L Hayes; Mark A Hlatky; L Kristin Newby; Richard L Page; Mark H Schoenfeld; Michael J Silka; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Michael O Sweeney; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; Christopher E Buller; Mark A Creager; Steven M Ettinger; David P Faxon; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon A Hunt; Harlan M Krumholz; Frederick G Kushner; Bruce W Lytle; Rick A Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel; Lynn G Tarkington; Clyde W Yancy Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Glenn N Levine; Antoinette S Gomes; Andrew E Arai; David A Bluemke; Scott D Flamm; Emanuel Kanal; Warren J Manning; Edward T Martin; J Michael Smith; Norbert Wilke; Frank S Shellock Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-11-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Claas P Naehle; Katharina Strach; Daniel Thomas; Carsten Meyer; Markus Linhart; Sascha Bitaraf; Harold Litt; Jörg Otto Schwab; Hans Schild; Torsten Sommer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-08-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: C Brockmann; T Sommer; R Pirzer; H U Kerl; I S Nolte; A Förster; M A Brockmann Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2012-10-19 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Saman Nazarian; Rozann Hansford; Amir A Rahsepar; Valeria Weltin; Diana McVeigh; Esra Gucuk Ipek; Alan Kwan; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Albert C Lardo; Michael A Kraut; Ihab R Kamel; Stefan L Zimmerman; Henry R Halperin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Roberto Bolli; Joshua M Hare; Keith L March; Carl J Pepine; James T Willerson; Emerson C Perin; Phillip C Yang; Timothy D Henry; Jay H Traverse; Raul D Mitrani; Aisha Khan; Ivonne Hernandez-Schulman; Doris A Taylor; Darcy L DiFede; João A C Lima; Atul Chugh; John Loughran; Rachel W Vojvodic; Shelly L Sayre; Judy Bettencourt; Michelle Cohen; Lem Moyé; Ray F Ebert; Robert D Simari Journal: Circ Res Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Roberto Bolli; Joshua M Hare; Timothy D Henry; Carrie G Lenneman; Keith L March; Kathy Miller; Carl J Pepine; Emerson C Perin; Jay H Traverse; James T Willerson; Phillip C Yang; Adrian P Gee; João A Lima; Lem Moyé; Rachel W Vojvodic; Shelly L Sayre; Judy Bettencourt; Michelle Cohen; Ray F Ebert; Robert D Simari Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Joshua M Hare; Joel E Fishman; Gary Gerstenblith; Darcy L DiFede Velazquez; Juan P Zambrano; Viky Y Suncion; Melissa Tracy; Eduard Ghersin; Peter V Johnston; Jeffrey A Brinker; Elayne Breton; Janice Davis-Sproul; Ivonne H Schulman; John Byrnes; Adam M Mendizabal; Maureen H Lowery; Didier Rouy; Peter Altman; Cheryl Wong Po Foo; Phillip Ruiz; Alexandra Amador; Jose Da Silva; Ian K McNiece; Alan W Heldman; Richard George; Albert Lardo Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-12-12 Impact factor: 56.272