Literature DB >> 21872424

Prospective results of uncemented tantalum monoblock tibia in total knee arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up in patients younger than 55 years.

Atul F Kamath1, Gwo-Chin Lee, Neil P Sheth, Charles L Nelson, Jonathan P Garino, Craig L Israelite.   

Abstract

A significant increase in younger patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty raises the theoretical concern for revision secondary to micromotion and fixation failure with cemented components. We prospectively studied 100 consecutive tantalum monoblock uncemented tibial components and 312 concurrent cemented controls. Patients younger than 55 years with adequate bone stock were enrolled. This cementless patient group was younger and had higher preoperative functional status. Prostheses were posterior-substituting uncemented femoral and tibial components with a cemented patellar button. Knee Society pain and function scores and radiographs were obtained, and a cost analysis was performed. Knee Society scores were excellent and equivalent beyond 6 months. There was no significant difference in perioperative blood loss, complication rates, or cost. There was a significant decrease in operative time in the uncemented group. Radiographs revealed no failures of ingrowth at last follow-up. There were 3 uncemented group failures, but none were due to failure of fixation. The use of a porous tantalum tibia at minimum 5 years has yielded promising clinical and radiographic results in a younger patient population.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21872424     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  16 in total

1.  The Mark Coventry Award: Trabecular metal tibial components were durable and reliable in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Matthew P Abdel; David G Lewallen; Michael J Stuart; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Arlen D Hanssen; Mark W Pagnano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Cementless total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alessandro Aprato; Salvatore Risitano; Luigi Sabatini; Matteo Giachino; Gabriele Agati; Alessandro Massè
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

4.  Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mariano Fernandez-Fairen; Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Antonio Murcia; Ana Torres; Rafael Llopis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Orthopedic surgery approach with uncemented metallic prosthesis in knee osteoarthritis increases the quality of life of young patients.

Authors:  Bogdan Uivaraseanu; Simona Bungau; Delia Mirela Tit; Tapan Behl; Teodor Andrei Maghiar; Octavian Maghiar; Carmen Pantis; Dana Carmen Zaha; Jenel M Patrascu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Ceramic-on-ceramic THA Implants in Patients Younger Than 20 Years.

Authors:  Didier Hannouche; Flore Devriese; Jérôme Delambre; Frédéric Zadegan; Idriss Tourabaly; Laurent Sedel; Sylvie Chevret; Rémy Nizard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Does a simple syringe applicator enhance bone cement set up time in knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Nipun Sodhi; Sarah E Dalton; Anton Khlopas; Assem A Sultan; Gannon L Curtis; Matthew A Harb; Qais Naziri; Jared M Newman; John W Barrington; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

8.  Outcomes of a newer-generation cementless total knee arthroplasty design in patients less than 50 years of age.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Chukwuweike Gwam; Jared M Newman; Morad Chughtai; Anton Khlopas; Prem N Ramkumar; Steven F Harwin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

9.  Use of porous monoblock patella component should avoid for patient with patella baja.

Authors:  Takao Kaneko; Norihiko Kono; Yuta Mochizuki; Hiroyasu Ikegami; Yoshiro Musha
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-23

Review 10.  The Clinical Application of Porous Tantalum and Its New Development for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Gan Huang; Shu-Ting Pan; Jia-Xuan Qiu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.