Literature DB >> 21872201

Is the treatment of CIN 2 always necessary in women under 25 years old?

Bree McAllum1, Peter H H Sykes, Lynn Sadler, Helene Macnab, Bryony J Simcock, Adel K Mekhail.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review the outcome of conservatively managed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 in women <25 years old. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective review that included women who were <25 years old with biopsy proven CIN2 between 2005 and 2009. Analysis was performed that compared women who had immediate treatment with women whose treatment was deferred >4 months. The primary outcome measure was spontaneous regression of CIN2. Secondary outcomes were treatment rates and loss to follow-up evaluation.
RESULTS: Of the 452 women who were identified, 256 women (57%) received immediate treatment; 157 women (35%) met the definition for conservative management, and 39 women (9%) had unknown subsequent management. Of the 157 women who were managed conservatively, 98 women (62%) showed spontaneous regression, with a median of 8 months observation. No conservatively managed women progressed to cancer.
CONCLUSION: Based on the 62% regression rate in this study, routine treatment may not be necessary for all women with CIN2 who are <25 years old.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21872201     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  15 in total

1.  Adherence to conservative management recommendations for abnormal pap test results in adolescents.

Authors:  Rebecca B Perkins; Jennifer R Jorgensen; Molly E McCoy; Sharon M Bak; Tracy A Battaglia; Karen M Freund
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Usefulness of p16INK4a staining for managing histological high-grade squamous intraepithelial cervical lesions.

Authors:  Ester Miralpeix; Jordi Genovés; Josep Maria Solé-Sedeño; Gemma Mancebo; Belen Lloveras; Beatriz Bellosillo; Francesc Alameda; Ramon Carreras
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Clinical outcomes of abnormal cervical cytology and human papillomavirus-related lesions in patients with organ transplantation: 11-year experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Yusuke Tanaka; Yutaka Ueda; Mamoru Kakuda; Satoshi Kubota; Satoko Matsuzaki; Satoshi Nakagawa; Tomomi Egawa-Takata; Shinya Matsuzaki; Eiji Kobayashi; Kiyoshi Yoshino; Tadashi Kimura
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Does CIN2 Have the Same Aggressive Potential As CIN3? A Secondary Analysis of High-Grade Cytology Recurrence in Women Treated with Cold-Coagulation Cervical Treatment.

Authors:  D Papoutsis; M Underwood; W Parry-Smith; J Panikkar
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 5.  Screening for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Terresa J Eun; Rebecca B Perkins
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.456

6.  Cervical carcinoma rates among young females in the United States.

Authors:  Vicki B Benard; Meg Watson; Philip E Castle; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Updating the natural history of human papillomavirus and anogenital cancers.

Authors:  Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Mark Schiffman; Ann Burchell; Ginesa Albero; Anna R Giuliano; Marc T Goodman; Susanne K Kjaer; Joel Palefsky
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Cervical cancer screening in young and elderly women of the Xingu Indigenous Park: evaluation of the recommended screening age group in Brazil.

Authors:  Neila Maria de Góis Speck; Juliana da Silva Pinheiro; Erica Ribeiro Pereira; Douglas Rodrigues; Gustavo Rubino de Azevedo Focchi; Julisa Chamorro Lascasas Ribalta
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

9.  HPV E6/E7 RNA in situ hybridization signal patterns as biomarkers of three-tier cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade.

Authors:  Mark F Evans; Zhihua Peng; Kelli M Clark; Christine S-C Adamson; Xiao-Jun Ma; Xingyong Wu; Hongwei Wang; Yuling Luo; Kumarasen Cooper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Clinical course of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 under active surveillance: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karoliina Tainio; Antonios Athanasiou; Kari A O Tikkinen; Riikka Aaltonen; Jovita Cárdenas; Sivan Glazer-Livson; Maija Jakobsson; Kirsi Joronen; Mari Kiviharju; Karolina Louvanto; Sanna Oksjoki; Riikka Tähtinen; Seppo Virtanen; Pekka Nieminen; Maria Kyrgiou; Ilkka Kalliala
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.