Literature DB >> 27739439

Usefulness of p16INK4a staining for managing histological high-grade squamous intraepithelial cervical lesions.

Ester Miralpeix1, Jordi Genovés1, Josep Maria Solé-Sedeño1, Gemma Mancebo1, Belen Lloveras2, Beatriz Bellosillo2, Francesc Alameda2, Ramon Carreras1.   

Abstract

p16INK4a (p16) tumor-suppressor protein is a biomarker of human papillomavirus (HPV) oncogenic activity that has revealed a high rate of positivity in histological high-gade squamous intraepithelial lesion/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (HSIL/CIN2) lesions. However, there is a paucity of data regarding p16 status as a surrogate marker of HSIL/CIN2 evolution. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of HSIL/CIN2 patients followed up without treatment for 12 months according to p16 immunohistochemical staining. Patients diagnosed with HSIL/CIN2 colposcopy-directed biopsy, were recruited prospectively between December 2011 and October 2013. p16 staining was performed in all HSIL/CIN2 diagnostic biopsies. Follow-up was conducted every 4 months by cytology, colposcopy and biopsy if suspicion of progression and once the 12 months of follow-up completed. Complete regression, partial regression, persistence, and progression rates of HSIL/CIN2 were defined as a final outcome. A total of 96 patients were included in the analysis. The rate of spontaneous regression was 64%, while 28% had persistent disease, and 8% progressed at 12 months of follow-up. p16 was positive in 81 (84%) initial HSIL/CIN2 biopsies. Regression was observed in all 15 p16 negative cases and in 46 of 81 (57%) p16 positive cases (P=0.001). In conclusion, patients with p16 negative HSIL/CIN2 biopsy had a high rate of regression during first 12 months of follow-up. Status of p16 staining could be considered for HSIL/CIN2 management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27739439     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  26 in total

1.  Rate of and risks for regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Yifei Ma; Charles Wibbelsman; Teresa M Darragh; Adaleen Powers; Sepideh Farhat; Stephen Shiboski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Human papillomavirus detection and p16INK4a expression in cervical lesions: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jordi Genovés; Frances Alameda; Gemma Mancebo; Josep Maria Solé; Beatriz Bellosillo; Belen Lloveras; Silvia Agramunt; Maria Teresa Baró; Mercè Muset; Beatriz Casado; Laia Serrano; Esther Miralpeix; Ramon Carreras
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  Follow-up study of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 overexpressing p16Ink4a.

Authors:  Stefania Cortecchia; Giuseppe Galanti; Cecilia Sgadari; Silvano Costa; Margherita De Lillo; Licia Caprara; Giovanni Barillari; Paolo Monini; Roberto Nannini; Barbara Ensoli; Lauro Bucchi
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Is the treatment of CIN 2 always necessary in women under 25 years old?

Authors:  Bree McAllum; Peter H H Sykes; Lynn Sadler; Helene Macnab; Bryony J Simcock; Adel K Mekhail
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Assessment of correlation between p16INK4a staining, specific subtype of human papillomavirus, and progression of LSIL/CIN1 lesions: first comparative study.

Authors:  Maryam Razmpoosh; Andrée Sansregret; Luc L Oligny; Natalie Patey; Virginie Dormoy-Raclet; Thierry Ducruet; Dorothée Bouron-Dal Soglio
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Outcome of expectant management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women followed for 12 months.

Authors:  Michelle G Discacciati; Carlos André S de Souza; Maria Gabriela d'Otavianno; Liliana A L Ângelo-Andrade; Maria Cristina A Westin; Silvia H Rabelo-Santos; Luiz C Zeferino
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization project for HPV-associated lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology.

Authors:  Teresa M Darragh; Terence J Colgan; J Thomas Cox; Debra S Heller; Michael R Henry; Ronald D Luff; Timothy McCalmont; Ritu Nayar; Joel M Palefsky; Mark H Stoler; Edward J Wilkinson; Richard J Zaino; David C Wilbur
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.762

8.  p16INK4A immunohistochemical staining and predictive value for progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1: a prospective study in China.

Authors:  Guang-Dong Liao; John W Sellors; Hai-Kui Sun; Xun Zhang; Yan-Ping Bao; Jose Jeronimo; Wen Chen; Fang-Hui Zhao; Yan Song; Zhi Cao; Shao-Kai Zhang; Ming-Rong Xi; You-Lin Qiao
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 9.  Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Arbyn; M Kyrgiou; C Simoens; A O Raifu; G Koliopoulos; P Martin-Hirsch; W Prendiville; E Paraskevaidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-09-18

10.  p16(INK4a) immunohistochemistry is a promising biomarker to predict the outcome of low grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: comparison study with HPV genotyping.

Authors:  Sakiko Nishio; Takuma Fujii; Hiroshi Nishio; Kaori Kameyama; Miyuki Saito; Takashi Iwata; Kaneyuki Kubushiro; Daisuke Aoki
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.401

View more
  11 in total

1.  Using p16 immunohistochemistry to classify morphologic cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2: correlation of ambiguous staining patterns with HPV subtypes and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Yuxin Liu; Mahfood Alqatari; Kieran Sultan; Fei Ye; Dana Gao; Keith Sigel; David Zhang; Tamara Kalir
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Possible role of negative human papillomavirus E6/E7 mRNA as a predictor of regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 lesions in hr-HPV positive women.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Bruno; Nazario Cassaro; Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Arianna Guaita; Sara Boemi
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 5.913

3.  Classification of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by p16ink4a , Ki-67, HPV E4 and FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation status demonstrates considerable heterogeneity with potential consequences for management.

Authors:  Frederique J Vink; Stèfanie Dick; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Lise M A De Strooper; Renske D M Steenbergen; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Arno Floore; Jesper H Bonde; Anja Oštrbenk Valenčak; Mario Poljak; Karl U Petry; Peter Hillemanns; Nienke E van Trommel; Johannes Berkhof; Maaike C G Bleeker; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Automatic labeling of molecular biomarkers of immunohistochemistry images using fully convolutional networks.

Authors:  Fahime Sheikhzadeh; Rabab K Ward; Dirk van Niekerk; Martial Guillaud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Randomised study shows that repeated self-sampling and HPV test has more than two-fold higher detection rate of women with CIN2+ histology than Pap smear cytology.

Authors:  Inger Gustavsson; Riina Aarnio; Malin Berggrund; Julia Hedlund-Lindberg; Ann-Sofi Strand; Karin Sanner; Ingrid Wikström; Stefan Enroth; Matts Olovsson; Ulf Gyllensten
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Analysis of factors affecting the prognosis of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2.

Authors:  Xiaobo Zhang; Yougui Xu; Tianyu Meng; Danhua Shen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  The Diagnostic Utility of p16 Immunostaining in Differentiating Cancer and HSIL from LSIL and Benign in Cervical Cells.

Authors:  Ming-Zhe Wu; Shiyu Wang; Min Zheng; Li-Xiang Tian; Xin Wu; Ke-Jun Guo; Y I Zhang; Guang-Ping Wu
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Role of FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation analysis in predicting regression or non-regression of CIN2/3 lesions: a protocol of an observational longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Wieke W Kremer; Johannes Berkhof; Maaike Cg Bleeker; Daniëlle Am Heideman; Nienke E van Trommel; Marchien W van Baal; Harold R Verhoeve; Chris Jlm Meijer; Gemma G Kenter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  HPV viral load in self-collected vaginal fluid samples as predictor for presence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Malin Berggrund; Inger Gustavsson; Riina Aarnio; Julia Hedlund-Lindberg; Karin Sanner; Ingrid Wikström; Stefan Enroth; Matts Olovsson; Ulf Gyllensten
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.099

10.  The role of low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 11 as a tumor promoter in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Sai Han; Xuewu You; Xuejiao Shi; Lu Liu; Yu Sun; Yana Ma; Qiuhong Qian; Hongli Liu; Baoxia Cui; Youzhong Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.