Literature DB >> 21870205

Seeing while acting: hand movements can modulate attentional capture by motion onset.

Davood G Gozli1, Jay Pratt.   

Abstract

The onset of new motion has been shown to be a very robust cause of attentional capture, generating a processing advantage for the location of motion onset regardless of the observer's concurrent goal. The present study, motivated by the common-coding account of action and perception, examined whether the effect of motion onset on visual attention can be modulated by the observer's mode of action. Specifically, the common-coding account predicts that preparing an action can render the features that are used in the action plan less available for visual processes. Consistent with this hypothesis, in Experiment 1 the magnitude of attentional capture caused by a single motion onset was reduced when this motion was similar to the observer's response (i.e., along the same axis). Similarly, in Experiment 2 the onset of a response-different motion gained a processing advantage over the response-similar motion onset when the two were presented simultaneously. Since both types of motion were present in every trial, the results of Experiment 2 suggest that response similarity affected visual-attentional processes rather than motor processes. Together, these results suggest that the processes of attentional prioritization caused by motion onset can be modulated by the observer's concurrent action.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21870205     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0203-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  8 in total

1.  Visuospatial cueing by self-caused features: Orienting of attention and action-outcome associative learning.

Authors:  Davood G Gozli; Hira Aslam; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

2.  Biasing spatial attention with semantic information: an event coding approach.

Authors:  Tarek Amer; Davood G Gozli; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-21

3.  Ideomotor perception modulates visuospatial cueing.

Authors:  Davood G Gozli; Stephanie C Goodhew; Joshua B Moskowitz; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-11-06

4.  The effect of pre-cueing on spatial attention across perception and action.

Authors:  Moran M Israel; Pierre Jolicoeur; Asher Cohen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

5.  Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Davood G Gozli; Jay Pratt; K Zoë Martin; Alison L Chasteen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming: reconciling motorvisual impairment and facilitation effects.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; Brian Hopkins; R Christopher Miall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Visuomotor and motorvisual priming with different types of set-level congruency: evidence in support of ideomotor theory, and the planning and control model (PCM).

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; R Christopher Miall; Miriam Rueß; Puja R Mehta; Brian Hopkins
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-29

8.  Perception during use of force and the likelihood of firing upon an unarmed person.

Authors:  Adam T Biggs; Joseph A Hamilton; Andrew E Jensen; Greg H Huffman; Joel Suss; Timothy L Dunn; Sarah Sherwood; Dale A Hirsch; Jayson Rhoton; Karen R Kelly; Rachel R Markwald
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.996

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.