Literature DB >> 21865540

Ongoing ingestive behavior is rapidly suppressed by a preabsorptive, intestinal "bitter taste" cue.

Lindsey A Schier1, Terry L Davidson, Terry L Powley.   

Abstract

The discovery that cells in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract express the same molecular receptors and intracellular signaling components known to be involved in taste has generated great interest in potential functions of such post-oral "taste" receptors in the control of food intake. To determine whether taste cues in the GI tract are detected and can directly influence behavior, the present study used a microbehavioral analysis of intake, in which rats drank from lickometers that were programmed to simultaneously deliver a brief yoked infusion of a taste stimulus to the intestines. Specifically, in daily 30-min sessions, thirsty rats with indwelling intraduodenal catheters were trained to drink hypotonic (0.12 M) sodium chloride (NaCl) and simultaneously self-infuse a 0.12 M NaCl solution. Once trained, in a subsequent series of intestinal taste probe trials, rats reduced licking during a 6-min infusion period, when a bitter stimulus denatonium benzoate (DB; 10 mM) was added to the NaCl vehicle for infusion, apparently conditioning a mild taste aversion. Presentation of the DB in isomolar lithium chloride (LiCl) for intestinal infusions accelerated the development of the response across trials and strengthened the temporal resolution of the early licking suppression in response to the arrival of the DB in the intestine. In an experiment to evaluate whether CCK is involved as a paracrine signal in transducing the intestinal taste of DB, the CCK-1R antagonist devazepide partially blocked the response to intestinal DB. In contrast to their ability to detect and avoid the bitter taste in the intestine, rats did not modify their licking to saccharin intraduodenal probe infusions. The intestinal taste aversion paradigm developed here provides a sensitive and effective protocol for evaluating which tastants-and concentrations of tastants-in the lumen of the gut can control ingestion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21865540      PMCID: PMC3213931          DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00344.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  53 in total

1.  Bait shyness: avoidance of the taste without escape from the illness in rats.

Authors:  K W Rusiniak; J Gracia; W G Hankins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1976-05

2.  Rats fail to discriminate quinine from denatonium: implications for the neural coding of bitter-tasting compounds.

Authors:  Alan C Spector; Stacy L Kopka
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The contribution of naso-oral and postingestional factors in taste aversion learning in the rat.

Authors:  K Schneider; K Wothe
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1979-01

4.  Effects of glucose on feeding in relation to routes of entry in rats.

Authors:  T H Yin; C T Tsai
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1973-11

5.  Acquisition of learned taste aversion following bilateral subdiaphragmatic vagotomy in rats.

Authors:  J R Martin; F Y Cheng; D Novin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1978-07

6.  Selective effects of vagal deafferentation and celiac-superior mesenteric ganglionectomy on the reinforcing and satiating action of intestinal nutrients.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff; Gary J Schwartz
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2003-02

7.  Flavor-toxicosis associations: tests of three hypotheses of long delay learning.

Authors:  M A Lindberg; A L Beggs; D D Chezik; D Ray
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1982-09

8.  Proteins but not amino acids, carbohydrates, or fats stimulate cholecystokinin secretion in the rat.

Authors:  R A Liddle; G M Green; C K Conrad; J A Williams
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1986-08

9.  Cholecystokinin suppresses food intake by inhibiting gastric emptying.

Authors:  T H Moran; P R McHugh
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1982-05

10.  Small intestinal glucose transport. Proximal-distal kinetic gradients.

Authors:  A K Rider; H P Schedl; G Nokes; S Shining
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  6 in total

1.  Rapid stimulus-bound suppression of intake in response to an intraduodenal nonnutritive sweetener after training with nutritive sugars predicting malaise.

Authors:  Lindsey A Schier; Terry L Davidson; Terry L Powley
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 2.  A view of obesity as a learning and memory disorder.

Authors:  Terry L Davidson; Andrea L Tracy; Lindsey A Schier; Susan E Swithers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.478

3.  Neurons with diverse phenotypes project from the caudal to the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract.

Authors:  Susan Travers; Joseph Breza; Jacob Harley; JiuLin Zhu; Joseph Travers
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Mouse intragastric infusion (iG) model.

Authors:  Akiko Ueno; Raul Lazaro; Ping-Yen Wang; Reiichi Higashiyama; Keigo Machida; Hidekazu Tsukamoto
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Post-oral sugar detection rapidly and chemospecifically modulates taste-guided behavior.

Authors:  Lindsey A Schier; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Responsiveness Expressions of Bitter Taste Receptors Against Denatonium Benzoate and Genistein in the Heart, Spleen, Lung, Kidney, and Bursa Fabricius of Chinese Fast Yellow Chicken.

Authors:  Enayatullah Hamdard; Zengpeng Lv; Jingle Jiang; Quanwei Wei; Zhicheng Shi; Rahmani Mohammad Malyar; Debing Yu; Fangxiong Shi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.