Literature DB >> 12576127

Selective effects of vagal deafferentation and celiac-superior mesenteric ganglionectomy on the reinforcing and satiating action of intestinal nutrients.

Anthony Sclafani1, Karen Ackroff, Gary J Schwartz.   

Abstract

The role of vagal afferents and splanchnic fibers in nutrient-induced flavor conditioning and feeding suppression was determined. Male rats were fitted with intraduodenal (ID) catheters and given subdiaphragmatic vagal deafferentation (SDA), celiac-superior mesenteric ganglionectomy (CGX), combined (COM) treatments, or sham surgery. In separate conditioning trials, they were trained to drink (30 min/day) flavored saccharin solutions paired with concurrent ID infusions of 8% maltodextrin or water and 3.55% corn oil or water. Experiment 1 revealed that SDA and sham rats showed equal preferences for the nutrient-paired flavors over the water-paired flavors. In contrast, SDA rats, unlike sham rats, failed to suppress their intake of a palatable fluid when infused intraduodenally with maltodextrin or corn oil. Experiment 2 revealed that CGX, COM and sham rats all developed preferences for the maltodextrin-paired flavor, although CGX alone or COM attenuated the conditioned preference. CGX and COM treatments also attenuated or blocked the feeding inhibitory actions of ID nutrient infusions. These findings along with prior data indicate that gut vagal afferents and splanchnic nerves are not essential for flavor-nutrient preference conditioning, whereas both vagal afferents and splanchnic nerves are implicated in carbohydrate- and fat-induced satiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12576127     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00968-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  54 in total

Review 1.  Gut-brain nutrient signaling. Appetition vs. satiation.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Damien S Glass; Robert F Margolskee; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 3.  The gut-brain dopamine axis: a regulatory system for caloric intake.

Authors:  Ivan E de Araujo; Jozélia G Ferreira; Luis A Tellez; Xueying Ren; Catherine W Yeckel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-03-03

Review 4.  Homeostatic regulation of protein intake: in search of a mechanism.

Authors:  Christopher D Morrison; Scott D Reed; Tara M Henagan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 5.  Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 6.  Regulation of energy balance by a gut-brain axis and involvement of the gut microbiota.

Authors:  Paige V Bauer; Sophie C Hamr; Frank A Duca
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Thoracic cross-over pathways of the rat vagal trunks.

Authors:  Charles C Horn; Mark I Friedman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 8.  Integrative capacity of the caudal brainstem in the control of food intake.

Authors:  Gary J Schwartz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Post-oral fat stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: A concentration-response study.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-02-28

10.  Intragastric fat self-administration is impaired in GPR40/120 double knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Khalid Touzani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.