OBJECTIVE: To systematically investigate the reproducibility and reliability of a newly developed, less invasive approach of estimating blood volume (BV), using indocyanine green (ICG) measured with pulse-spectrophotometry. DESIGN: Prospective, clinical study. SETTING: Surgical unit at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-two patients undergoing general anesthesia for elective surgery and seven healthy volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Catheters were inserted into the forearm veins of healthy volunteers for the administration of ICG and blood sampling for the measurement of hemoglobin concentration. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The distribution volumes of ICG in seven healthy volunteers were estimated repetitively following three or four consecutive intravenous administrations at 30-min intervals. A low intrasubject coefficient of variation of 3.94 +/- 2.03 (SEM) % and a reasonable intersubject coefficient of variation of 13.3 +/- 5.52% (in mL/kg) for the BV measurements were obtained. In addition, ICG was administered to 22 patients, first under general anesthesia by a bolus, and then by a bolus with a constant-rate infusion. The ICG blood concentration was noninvasively measured with pulse-spectrophotometry. The blood concentration time courses following both bolus and constant-rate infusion were well fitted by the one-compartment model, indicating that the distribution equilibrium of ICG is instantaneous. The distribution volumes estimated following bolus injection correlate closely with the distribution volume estimated based on constant-rate infusion administration (r2 = .90). CONCLUSIONS: The BV estimation with a bolus injection of ICG and pulse-spectrophotometry is reliable, as reflected by the reproducible BVs estimated in the same subject. The integrated pulse-spectrophotometry monitoring system offers a less invasive and useful tool for bedside estimation of BV.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically investigate the reproducibility and reliability of a newly developed, less invasive approach of estimating blood volume (BV), using indocyanine green (ICG) measured with pulse-spectrophotometry. DESIGN: Prospective, clinical study. SETTING: Surgical unit at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-two patients undergoing general anesthesia for elective surgery and seven healthy volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Catheters were inserted into the forearm veins of healthy volunteers for the administration of ICG and blood sampling for the measurement of hemoglobin concentration. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The distribution volumes of ICG in seven healthy volunteers were estimated repetitively following three or four consecutive intravenous administrations at 30-min intervals. A low intrasubject coefficient of variation of 3.94 +/- 2.03 (SEM) % and a reasonable intersubject coefficient of variation of 13.3 +/- 5.52% (in mL/kg) for the BV measurements were obtained. In addition, ICG was administered to 22 patients, first under general anesthesia by a bolus, and then by a bolus with a constant-rate infusion. The ICG blood concentration was noninvasively measured with pulse-spectrophotometry. The blood concentration time courses following both bolus and constant-rate infusion were well fitted by the one-compartment model, indicating that the distribution equilibrium of ICG is instantaneous. The distribution volumes estimated following bolus injection correlate closely with the distribution volume estimated based on constant-rate infusion administration (r2 = .90). CONCLUSIONS: The BV estimation with a bolus injection of ICG and pulse-spectrophotometry is reliable, as reflected by the reproducible BVs estimated in the same subject. The integrated pulse-spectrophotometry monitoring system offers a less invasive and useful tool for bedside estimation of BV.
Authors: Julian M Stewart; Marvin S Medow; June L Glover; Leslie D Montgomery Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2005-09-02 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Julian M Stewart; Leslie D Montgomery; June L Glover; Marvin S Medow Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2006-08-25 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Sanne M Dorhout Mees; Reinier G Hoff; Gabriel J E Rinkel; Ale Algra; Walter M van den Bergh Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Julian M Stewart; Marvin S Medow; Leslie D Montgomery; June L Glover; Mark M Millonas Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2005-06-17 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Menno R Germans; Philip C de Witt Hamer; Leonard J van Boven; Koos A H Zwinderman; Gerrit J Bouma Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2009-09-04 Impact factor: 2.216