Literature DB >> 21862766

MRI after arthroplasty: comparison of MAVRIC and conventional fast spin-echo techniques.

Catherine L Hayter1, Matthew F Koff, Parina Shah, Kevin M Koch, Theodore T Miller, Hollis G Potter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the quality of images obtained with a prototype imaging technique, multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination (MAVRIC), compared with fast spin-echo (FSE) images in the evaluation of patients who have undergone hip, shoulder, or knee arthroplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI with metal-artifact reduction FSE and MAVRIC sequences was performed in the care of 122 patients who had undergone 74 hip, 27 shoulder, and 21 knee arthroplasties. The FSE and MAVRIC images were subjectively graded for visualization of the synovium, prosthesis-bone interface, and hip abductors or supraspinatus tendon. The presence of synovitis, osteolysis, or supraspinatus tendon tear was recorded.
RESULTS: Visualization of the synovium was significantly better on MAVRIC images than on FSE images of the hip (p < 0.0001), shoulder (p < 0.01), and knee (p < 0.01). Synovitis was detected only on the MAVRIC images of nine subjects (12%) who had undergone hip arthroplasty and five subjects (18%) who had undergone shoulder arthroplasty. Visualization of the periprosthetic bone was significantly better on MAVRIC images of the hip (p < 0.0001), shoulder (p < 0.0001), and knee (p < 0.01). Osteolysis was detected only on the MAVRIC images of 12 subjects (16%) who had undergone hip arthroplasty, six (22%) who had undergone shoulder arthroplasty, and five (24%) who had undergone knee arthroplasty. Visualization of the supraspinatus tendon was significantly better on MAVRIC images (p < 0.0001). Supraspinatus tendon tears in 12 subjects (44%) were detected only on MAVRIC images.
CONCLUSION: MAVRIC complements the information on FSE images after arthroplasty and is a useful additional sequence, particularly when there is concern about synovitis, periprosthetic osteolysis, or the presence of a supraspinatus tendon tear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21862766     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.6659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  58 in total

1.  Review. The Agfa Mayneord lecture: MRI of short and ultrashort T₂ and T₂* components of tissues, fluids and materials using clinical systems.

Authors:  G M Bydder
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  An illustrative review to understand and manage metal-induced artifacts in musculoskeletal MRI: a primer and updates.

Authors:  J P Dillenseger; S Molière; P Choquet; C Goetz; M Ehlinger; G Bierry
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Improved field-mapping and artifact correction in multispectral imaging.

Authors:  Brady Quist; Xinwei Shi; Hans Weber; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-03-05       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Reducing metallic artefacts in post-operative spinal imaging: slice encoding for metal artefact correction with dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation MRI at 3.0 T.

Authors:  K D Song; Y C Yoon; J Park
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artefacts in hip prostheses: a comparison of different prosthetic compositions.

Authors:  Elisabetta Panfili; Laura Pierdicca; Luca Salvolini; Luigi Imperiale; Jeffrey Dubbini; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 6.  Imaging near orthopedic hardware.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Alissa J Burge; Kevin M Koch; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  What is the Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Component Loosening in THA?

Authors:  Alissa J Burge; Gabrielle P Konin; Jennifer L Berkowitz; Bin Lin; Matthew F Koff; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Metal artifact reduction MRI of total ankle arthroplasty implants.

Authors:  Cesar de Cesar Netto; Lucas F Fonseca; Benjamin Fritz; Steven E Stern; Esther Raithel; Mathias Nittka; Lew C Schon; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Characterizing the limits of MRI near metallic prostheses.

Authors:  Matthew R Smith; Nathan S Artz; Curtis Wiens; Diego Hernando; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Management of metal-on-metal hip implant patients: Who, when and how to revise?

Authors:  Reshid Berber; John A Skinner; Alister J Hart
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.