BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology responsible for the significant outcome disparities between men and women with cardiac disease is largely unknown. Further investigation into basic cardiac physiological differences between the sexes is needed. This study utilized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based multiparametric strain analysis to search for sex-based differences in regional myocardial contractile function. METHODS: End-systolic strain (circumferential, longitudinal, and radial) was interpolated from MRI-based radiofrequency tissue tagging grid point displacements in each of 60 normal adult volunteers (32 females). RESULTS: The average global left ventricular (LV) strain among normal female volunteers (n = 32) was significantly larger in absolute value (functionally better) than in normal male volunteers (n = 28) in both the circumferential direction (Male/Female = -0.19 ± 0.02 vs. -0.21 ± 0.02; p = 0.025) and longitudinal direction (Male/Female = -0.14 ± 0.03 vs. -0.16 ± 0.02; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The finding of significantly larger circumferential and longitudinal LV strain among normal female volunteers suggests that baseline contractile differences between the sexes may contribute to the well-recognized divergence in cardiovascular disease outcomes. Further work is needed in order to determine the pathologic changes that occur in LV strain between women and men with the onset of cardiovascular disease.
BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology responsible for the significant outcome disparities between men and women with cardiac disease is largely unknown. Further investigation into basic cardiac physiological differences between the sexes is needed. This study utilized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based multiparametric strain analysis to search for sex-based differences in regional myocardial contractile function. METHODS: End-systolic strain (circumferential, longitudinal, and radial) was interpolated from MRI-based radiofrequency tissue tagging grid point displacements in each of 60 normal adult volunteers (32 females). RESULTS: The average global left ventricular (LV) strain among normal female volunteers (n = 32) was significantly larger in absolute value (functionally better) than in normal male volunteers (n = 28) in both the circumferential direction (Male/Female = -0.19 ± 0.02 vs. -0.21 ± 0.02; p = 0.025) and longitudinal direction (Male/Female = -0.14 ± 0.03 vs. -0.16 ± 0.02; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The finding of significantly larger circumferential and longitudinal LV strain among normal female volunteers suggests that baseline contractile differences between the sexes may contribute to the well-recognized divergence in cardiovascular disease outcomes. Further work is needed in order to determine the pathologic changes that occur in LV strain between women and men with the onset of cardiovascular disease.
Authors: Douglas Bree; Jason R Wollmuth; Brian P Cupps; Marc D Krock; Analyn Howells; Joseph Rogers; Nader Moazami; Michael K Pasque Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-07-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lori Mosca; Allison H Linfante; Emelia J Benjamin; Kathy Berra; Sharonne N Hayes; Brian W Walsh; Rosalind P Fabunmi; Johnny Kwan; Thomas Mills; Susan Lee Simpson Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Caroline Daly; Felicity Clemens; Jose L Lopez Sendon; Luigi Tavazzi; Eric Boersma; Nicholas Danchin; Francois Delahaye; Anselm Gitt; Desmond Julian; David Mulcahy; Witold Ruzyllo; Kristian Thygesen; Freek Verheugt; Kim M Fox Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-01-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Boaz D Rosen; Thor Edvardsen; Shenghan Lai; Ernesto Castillo; Li Pan; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Shantanu Sinha; Richard Kronmal; Donna Arnett; John R Crouse; Susan R Heckbert; David A Bluemke; Joao A C Lima Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-08-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Brian P Cupps; Douglas R Bree; Jason R Wollmuth; Analyn C Howells; Rochus K Voeller; Joseph G Rogers; Michael K Pasque Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Pavlos Moustakidis; Brian P Cupps; Benjamin J Pomerantz; Randall P Scheri; Hersh S Maniar; Andrew M Kates; Robert J Gropler; Michael K Pasque; Thoralf M Sundt Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Maria Sanz-de la Garza; Geneviève Giraldeau; Josefa Marin; Gonzalo Grazioli; Montserrat Esteve; Luigi Gabrielli; Carlos Brambila; Laura Sanchis; Bart Bijnens; Marta Sitges Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Jonas M Doerner; Daniel L Kuetting; Julian A Luetkens; Claas P Naehle; Darius Dabir; Rami Homsi; Jennifer Nadal; Hans H Schild; Daniel K Thomas Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Scott J Hetzel; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Gabriella Captur; Christopher J Francois; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Michael Salerno; Shawn D Teague; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Rob J van der Geest; David A Bluemke Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Eylem Levelt; Masliza Mahmod; Stefan K Piechnik; Rina Ariga; Jane M Francis; Christopher T Rodgers; William T Clarke; Nikant Sabharwal; Jurgen E Schneider; Theodoros D Karamitsos; Kieran Clarke; Oliver J Rider; Stefan Neubauer Journal: Diabetes Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: David R Rutkowski; Gregory P Barton; Christopher J François; Niti Aggarwal; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2020-02-27
Authors: MengQi Zhang; Joshua Montroy; Rahul Sharma; Dean A Fergusson; Asher A Mendelson; Kimberly F Macala; Stephane L Bourque; Jared M Schlechte; Mikaela K Eng; Braedon McDonald; Sean E Gill; Kirsten M Fiest; Patricia C Liaw; Alison Fox-Robichaud; Manoj M Lalu Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2021-06-14