David R Rutkowski1, Gregory P Barton1, Christopher J François1, Niti Aggarwal1, Alejandro Roldán-Alzate1. 1. Departments of Mechanical Engineering (D.R.R., A.R.A.), Radiology (D.R.R., G.P.B., C.J.F., A.R.A.), Medical Physics (G.P.B.), Cardiovascular Medicine (N.A.), and Biomedical Engineering (A.R.A.), University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53705.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to further understand the relationship between cardiac function and flow, on the basis of sex, by quantifying cardiac flow characteristics and relating them to cardiac muscle performance in young adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, cardiac four-dimensional flow (4D flow) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and two-dimensional cine MRI were performed on 20 male and 19 female volunteers aged 20-35. Velocity-based metrics of flow, kinetic energy, vorticity, and efficiency indices were quantified, as well as cardiac strain metrics. RESULTS*: Peak systolic blood kinetic energy (male: 4.76 ± 2.66 mJ; female: 3.36 ± 1.43 mJ; p=0.047) was significantly higher in the male left ventricle (LV) than in the female LV. Peak systolic vorticity index (male: 0.008 ± 0.005 rad-m2/ml-s; female: 0.014 ± 0.007 rad-m2/ml-s; p=0.007), peak diastolic vorticity index (male: 0.007 ± 0.006 rad-m2/ml-s; female: 0.014 ± 0.010 rad-m2/ml-s; p=0.015), and cycle-average vorticity (male: 0.006 ± 0.001 rad-m2/ml-s; female: 0.011 ± 0.002 rad/s; p=0.001) were all significantly higher in the LV of women than they were in the LV of men. Radial, circumferential, and long-axis strain metrics were significantly higher in the female LV than in the male LV (p<0.05). Circumferential systolic and diastolic strain rates displayed moderate correlation to peak systolic (r=-0.38, p=0.022) and diastolic vorticity (r=0.40, p=0.015) values, respectively. *Results are reported as mean ± standard deviation. CONCLUSION: Left ventricular vorticity metrics were observed to be higher in women than in men and displayed moderate correlation to cardiac strain metrics. The methods and results of this study may be used to further understand the sex-based cardiac efficiency relationship between cardiac function and flow.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to further understand the relationship between cardiac function and flow, on the basis of sex, by quantifying cardiac flow characteristics and relating them to cardiac muscle performance in young adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, cardiac four-dimensional flow (4D flow) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and two-dimensional cine MRI were performed on 20 male and 19 female volunteers aged 20-35. Velocity-based metrics of flow, kinetic energy, vorticity, and efficiency indices were quantified, as well as cardiac strain metrics. RESULTS*: Peak systolic blood kinetic energy (male: 4.76 ± 2.66 mJ; female: 3.36 ± 1.43 mJ; p=0.047) was significantly higher in the male left ventricle (LV) than in the female LV. Peak systolic vorticity index (male: 0.008 ± 0.005 rad-m2/ml-s; female: 0.014 ± 0.007 rad-m2/ml-s; p=0.007), peak diastolic vorticity index (male: 0.007 ± 0.006 rad-m2/ml-s; female: 0.014 ± 0.010 rad-m2/ml-s; p=0.015), and cycle-average vorticity (male: 0.006 ± 0.001 rad-m2/ml-s; female: 0.011 ± 0.002 rad/s; p=0.001) were all significantly higher in the LV of women than they were in the LV of men. Radial, circumferential, and long-axis strain metrics were significantly higher in the female LV than in the male LV (p<0.05). Circumferential systolic and diastolic strain rates displayed moderate correlation to peak systolic (r=-0.38, p=0.022) and diastolic vorticity (r=0.40, p=0.015) values, respectively. *Results are reported as mean ± standard deviation. CONCLUSION: Left ventricular vorticity metrics were observed to be higher in women than in men and displayed moderate correlation to cardiac strain metrics. The methods and results of this study may be used to further understand the sex-based cardiac efficiency relationship between cardiac function and flow.
Authors: Verônica Rolim S Fernandes; Thor Edvardsen; Boaz D Rosen; Benilton Carvalho; Orlando Campos; Marco A S Cordeiro; Richard Kronmal; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2007 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Niti R Aggarwal; Hena N Patel; Laxmi S Mehta; Rupa M Sanghani; Gina P Lundberg; Sandra J Lewis; Marla A Mendelson; Malissa J Wood; Annabelle S Volgman; Jennifer H Mieres Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2018-02
Authors: Eric J Adkisson; Darren P Casey; Darren T Beck; Alvaro N Gurovich; Jeffery S Martin; Randy W Braith Journal: Exp Biol Med (Maywood) Date: 2010-01
Authors: Shunsuke Natori; Shenghan Lai; J Paul Finn; Antoinette S Gomes; W Gregory Hundley; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Gregory Pearson; Shantanu Sinha; Andrew Arai; Joao A C Lima; David A Bluemke Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Einar Heiberg; Jane Sjögren; Martin Ugander; Marcus Carlsson; Henrik Engblom; Håkan Arheden Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2010-01-11 Impact factor: 1.930
Authors: MengQi Zhang; Joshua Montroy; Rahul Sharma; Dean A Fergusson; Asher A Mendelson; Kimberly F Macala; Stephane L Bourque; Jared M Schlechte; Mikaela K Eng; Braedon McDonald; Sean E Gill; Kirsten M Fiest; Patricia C Liaw; Alison Fox-Robichaud; Manoj M Lalu Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2021-06-14
Authors: Ahmet Demirkiran; Pim van Ooij; Jos J M Westenberg; Mark B M Hofman; Hans C van Assen; Linda J Schoonmade; Usman Asim; Carmen P S Blanken; Aart J Nederveen; Albert C van Rossum; Marco J W Götte Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 6.875