Literature DB >> 21857762

Comparison of Optimal Design Methods in Inverse Problems.

H T Banks1, Kathleen Holm, Franz Kappel.   

Abstract

Typical optimal design methods for inverse or parameter estimation problems are designed to choose optimal sampling distributions through minimization of a specific cost function related to the resulting error in parameter estimates. It is hoped that the inverse problem will produce parameter estimates with increased accuracy using data collected according to the optimal sampling distribution. Here we formulate the classical optimal design problem in the context of general optimization problems over distributions of sampling times. We present a new Prohorov metric based theoretical framework that permits one to treat succinctly and rigorously any optimal design criteria based on the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM). A fundamental approximation theory is also included in this framework. A new optimal design, SE-optimal design (standard error optimal design), is then introduced in the context of this framework. We compare this new design criteria with the more traditional D-optimal and E-optimal designs. The optimal sampling distributions from each design are used to compute and compare standard errors; the standard errors for parameters are computed using asymptotic theory or bootstrapping and the optimal mesh. We use three examples to illustrate ideas: the Verhulst-Pearl logistic population model [13], the standard harmonic oscillator model [13] and a popular glucose regulation model [16, 19, 29].

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21857762      PMCID: PMC3157982          DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/27/7/075002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inverse Probl        ISSN: 0266-5611            Impact factor:   2.407


  7 in total

1.  Standard Error Computations for Uncertainty Quantification in Inverse Problems: Asymptotic Theory vs. Bootstrapping.

Authors:  H T Banks; Kathleen Holm; Danielle Robbins
Journal:  Math Comput Model       Date:  2010-11-01

2.  Mathematical modelling of the intravenous glucose tolerance test.

Authors:  A De Gaetano; O Arino
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Physiologic evaluation of factors controlling glucose tolerance in man: measurement of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell glucose sensitivity from the response to intravenous glucose.

Authors:  R N Bergman; L S Phillips; C Cobelli
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Modelling HIV immune response and validation with clinical data.

Authors:  H T Banks; M Davidian; Shuhua Hu; Grace M Kepler; E S Rosenberg
Journal:  J Biol Dyn       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.179

5.  Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity.

Authors:  R N Bergman; Y Z Ider; C R Bowden; C Cobelli
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1979-06

6.  Quantitative estimation of beta cell sensitivity to glucose in the intact organism: a minimal model of insulin kinetics in the dog.

Authors:  G Toffolo; R N Bergman; D T Finegood; C R Bowden; C Cobelli
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 9.461

7.  MINMOD: a computer program to calculate insulin sensitivity and pancreatic responsivity from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test.

Authors:  G Pacini; R N Bergman
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Modelling and optimal control of immune response of renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  H T Banks; Shuhua Hu; Taesoo Jang; Hee-Dae Kwon
Journal:  J Biol Dyn       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.179

2.  Experimental Design for Vector Output Systems.

Authors:  H T Banks; K L Rehm
Journal:  Inverse Probl Sci Eng       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.950

3.  Inference-based assessment of parameter identifiability in nonlinear biological models.

Authors:  Aidan C Daly; David Gavaghan; Jonathan Cooper; Simon Tavener
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Experimental Design for Distributed Parameter Vector Systems.

Authors:  H T Banks; K L Rehm
Journal:  Appl Math Lett       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 4.055

5.  Modeling Immune Response to BK Virus Infection and Donor Kidney in Renal Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  H T Banks; Shuhua Hu; Kathryn Link; Eric S Rosenberg; Sheila Mitsuma; Lauren Rosario
Journal:  Inverse Probl Sci Eng       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.950

6.  Host immune responses that promote initial HIV spread.

Authors:  K Wendelsdorf; G Dean; Shuhua Hu; S Nordone; H T Banks
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  A novel statistical analysis and interpretation of flow cytometry data.

Authors:  H T Banks; D F Kapraun; W Clayton Thompson; Cristina Peligero; Jordi Argilaguet; Andreas Meyerhans
Journal:  J Biol Dyn       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.179

8.  Optimal Design of Non-equilibrium Experiments for Genetic Network Interrogation.

Authors:  Kaska Adoteye; H T Banks; Kevin B Flores
Journal:  Appl Math Lett       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 4.055

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.