Literature DB >> 12692109

Intention to be screened over time for colorectal cancer in male automotive workers.

Beatty G Watts1, Sally W Vernon, Ronald E Myers, Barbara C Tilley.   

Abstract

Intention is an important construct in health promotion research, yet very little is known about whether cross-sectional correlates of intention to be screened for colorectal cancer (CRC) also predict intention over time or intention change. We used survey data from The Next Step Trial, a worksite health promotion trial, to address the following questions: (1) What is the consistency over time of intention to be screened for CRC? (2) Are the patterns and magnitude of associations between intention to be screened and the Preventive Health Model variables consistent over time? (3) What are the predictors of improving weaker intention to be screened, i.e., changing to strong intention? (4) What are the predictors of no change in strong intention to be screened, i.e., maintaining strong intention? and (5) What is the predictive ability of the models to predict intention to be screened for CRC? The study population consisted of white male automotive employees who responded to baseline (1993) and follow-up (1994 and 1995) surveys and did not have CRC at baseline or develop it during the study period. Of 5042 eligible workers, 2903 (58%) returned a baseline survey, and 2556 (88% of survey responders) met eligibility criteria; 75% (1929 of 2556) returned the year 1 survey, and 74% (1892 of 2556) returned the year 2 survey. We fit logistic regression models separately for the Preventive Health Model variables measured at baseline and each outcome (intention at year 1, intention at year 2, improving weaker intention, and no change in strong intention). The prevalence of strong intention to be screened for CRC was approximately 60% on all three surveys. Overall, 66% maintained their baseline intention over time. The most consistent predictors of strong intention, improving weaker intention, and no change in strong intention were family support, belief in the salience and coherence of screening, prior screening, and lack of concern about screening-related discomfort. Intention measured at baseline predicted intention measured 1 and 2 years later. Perceived susceptibility and lack of fear and worry about a CRC diagnosis predicted improving weaker intention. Having a family history of CRC or polyps predicted maintaining strong intention. Plant factors, self-efficacy, and beliefs about polyp removal were not predictors beyond the baseline year. Basing intervention development on cross-sectional associations may miss important factors or may incorrectly assume that cross-sectional associations are stable over time. A more focused, tailored intervention may be developed using factors that consistently predict intention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12692109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  25 in total

Review 1.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Effects of personalized colorectal cancer risk information on laypersons' interest in colorectal cancer screening: The importance of individual differences.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Christine W Duarte; Susannah Daggett; Andrea Siewers; Bill Killam; Kahsi A Smith; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-07-19

3.  Perceived risk for cancer in an urban sexual minority.

Authors:  Jack E Burkhalter; Jennifer L Hay; Elliot Coups; Barbara Warren; Yuelin Li; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-09-25

4.  The impact of computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and perceived usability and acceptability on the efficacy of a decision support tool for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Katrina Lindblom; Tess Gregory; Carlene Wilson; Ingrid H K Flight; Ian Zajac
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Colorectal cancer risk information presented by a nonphysician assistant does not increase screening rates.

Authors:  Thad Wilkins; Ralph A Gillies; Pina Panchal; Mittal Patel; Peter Warren; Robert R Schade
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Editor's Choice: Deliberative and non-deliberative effects of descriptive and injunctive norms on cancer screening behaviors among African Americans.

Authors:  Mark Manning; Todd Lucas; Stacy N Davis; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Hayley Thompson
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2019-11-20

7.  Willingness to participate in cancer screenings: blacks vs whites vs Puerto Rican Hispanics.

Authors:  Ralph V Katz; Cristina Claudio; Nancy R Kressin; B Lee Green; Min Qi Wang; Stefanie Luise Russell
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.302

8.  Deliberative and intuitive risk perceptions as predictors of colorectal cancer screening over time.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Marcel Ramos; Yuelin Li; Susan Holland; Debra Brennessel; M Margaret Kemeny
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-08-18

9.  Examining intuitive risk perceptions for cancer in diverse populations.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Raymond Baser; Neil D Weinstein; Yuelin Li; Louis Primavera; M Margaret Kemeny
Journal:  Health Risk Soc       Date:  2014-01-01

10.  Construct validity and invariance of four factors associated with colorectal cancer screening across gender, race, and prior screening.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.