Literature DB >> 21855669

Change in porosity is the major determinant of the variation of cortical bone elasticity at the millimeter scale in aged women.

Mathilde Granke1, Quentin Grimal, Amena Saïed, Pierre Nauleau, Françoise Peyrin, Pascal Laugier.   

Abstract

At the mesoscale (i.e. over a few millimeters), cortical bone can be described as two-phase composite material consisting of pores and a dense mineralized matrix. The cortical porosity is known to influence the mesoscopic elasticity. Our objective was to determine whether the variations of porosity are sufficient to predict the variations of bone mesoscopic anisotropic elasticity or if change in bone matrix elasticity is an important factor to consider. We measured 21 cortical bone specimens prepared from the mid-diaphysis of 10 women donors (aged from 66 to 98 years). A 50-MHz scanning acoustic microscope (SAM) was used to evaluate the bone matrix elasticity (reflected in impedance values) and porosity. Porosity evaluation with SAM was validated against Synchrotron Radiation μCT measurements. A standard contact ultrasonic method was applied to determine the mesoscopic elastic coefficients. Only matrix impedance in the direction of the bone axis correlated to mesoscale elasticity (adjusted R(2)=[0.16-0.25], p<0.05). The mesoscopic elasticity was found to be highly correlated to the cortical porosity (adj-R(2)=[0.72-0.84], p<10(-5)). Multivariate analysis including both matrix impedance and porosity did not provide a better statistical model of mesoscopic elasticity variations. Our results indicate that, for the elderly population, the elastic properties of the mineralized matrix do not undergo large variations among different samples, as reflected in the low coefficients of variation of matrix impedance (less than 6%). This work suggests that change in the intracortical porosity accounts for most of the variations of mesoscopic elasticity, at least when the analyzed porosity range is large (3-27% in this study). The trend in the variation of mesoscale elasticity with porosity is consistent with the predictions of a micromechanical model consisting of an anisotropic matrix pervaded by cylindrical pores.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21855669     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  31 in total

1.  Homogenization of cortical bone reveals that the organization and shape of pores marginally affect elasticity.

Authors:  Xiran Cai; Renald Brenner; Laura Peralta; Cécile Olivier; Pierre-Jean Gouttenoire; Christine Chappard; Françoise Peyrin; Didier Cassereau; Pascal Laugier; Quentin Grimal
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Ultrasound to assess bone quality.

Authors:  Kay Raum; Quentin Grimal; Peter Varga; Reinhard Barkmann; Claus C Glüer; Pascal Laugier
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Technologies for assessment of bone reflecting bone strength and bone mineral density in elderly women: an update.

Authors:  Alvilde Dhainaut; Mari Hoff; Unni Syversen; Glenn Haugeberg
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-22

Review 4.  The Role of Water Compartments in the Material Properties of Cortical Bone.

Authors:  Mathilde Granke; Mark D Does; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Insights into reference point indentation involving human cortical bone: sensitivity to tissue anisotropy and mechanical behavior.

Authors:  Mathilde Granke; Aurélie Coulmier; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Jennifer A Gaddy; Mark D Does; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2014-05-27

6.  Ex Vivo characterization of canine liver tissue viscoelasticity after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation.

Authors:  Danial Shahmirzadi; Gary Y Hou; Jiangang Chen; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Discrimination of fractures by low-frequency axial transmission ultrasound in postmenopausal females.

Authors:  P Moilanen; M Määttä; V Kilappa; L Xu; P H F Nicholson; M Alén; J Timonen; T Jämsä; S Cheng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Elastic modulus of the femoral trochanteric region measured by scanning acoustic microscopy in elderly women.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Matsuki; Junichi Shibano; Michiaki Kobayashi; Yukio Nakatsuchi; Tetsuji Moriizumi; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 9.  The Influence of Cortical Porosity on the Strength of Bone During Growth and Advancing Age.

Authors:  Sabashini K Ramchand; Ego Seeman
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Associations between radius low-frequency axial ultrasound velocity and bone fragility in elderly men and women.

Authors:  E Biver; J Pepe; A de Sire; T Chevalley; S Ferrari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.